mirror of
https://github.com/sockspls/badfish
synced 2025-04-30 08:43:09 +00:00
Simplify a depth condition
As the negative extension term has sensitive scaling, it would make more sense to allow more negative extension also at lower depth, and not just a region between low and high depth. Passed STC: LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25> Total: 124096 W: 31611 L: 31485 D: 61000 Ptnml(0-2): 422, 14437, 32205, 14561, 423 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/64d205d75b17f7c21c0dea82 Passed LTC: LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25> Total: 387882 W: 97840 L: 97993 D: 192049 Ptnml(0-2): 198, 42004, 109668, 41895, 176 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/64d333f85b17f7c21c0e06c6 closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4743 Bench: 1542357
This commit is contained in:
parent
d97a02ea2b
commit
222f3ea55b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
|||
|
||||
// If we are on a cutNode, reduce it based on depth (negative extension) (~1 Elo)
|
||||
else if (cutNode)
|
||||
extension = depth > 8 && depth < 17 ? -3 : -1;
|
||||
extension = depth < 17 ? -3 : -1;
|
||||
|
||||
// If the eval of ttMove is less than value, we reduce it (negative extension) (~1 Elo)
|
||||
else if (ttValue <= value)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue