diff --git a/src/evaluate.cpp b/src/evaluate.cpp
index eaad4d55..0657088f 100644
--- a/src/evaluate.cpp
+++ b/src/evaluate.cpp
@@ -1054,12 +1054,10 @@ Value Eval::evaluate(const Position& pos, int* complexity) {
   Color stm = pos.side_to_move();
   Value psq = pos.psq_eg_stm();
 
-  // Deciding between classical and NNUE eval: for high PSQ imbalance we use classical,
-  // but we switch to NNUE during long shuffling or with high material on the board.
-  bool useClassical = !useNNUE ||
-                      ((pos.count<ALL_PIECES>() > 7)
-                       && abs(psq) * 5 > (856 + pos.non_pawn_material() / 64) * (10 + pos.rule50_count()));
-
+  // We use the much less accurate but faster Classical eval when the NNUE 
+  // option is set to false. Otherwise we use the NNUE eval unless the
+  // PSQ advantage is decisive and several pieces remain (~3 Elo)
+  bool useClassical = !useNNUE || (pos.count<ALL_PIECES>() > 7 && abs(psq) > 1760);
   if (useClassical)
       v = Evaluation<NO_TRACE>(pos).value();
   else