1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sockspls/badfish synced 2025-05-02 09:39:36 +00:00

Tune search parameters (with Unai Corzo)

The values used in this patch are taken from a SPSA parameter tuning session
originated by Unai Corzo (@unaiic), but the final difference of his tune was
multiplied x2 by hand. Most of the credits should go to him :-)

STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/602f03d07f517a561bc49d40
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 67664 W: 6252 L: 6035 D: 55377
Ptnml(0-2): 256, 4799, 23527, 4972, 278

LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/602f41697f517a561bc49d5a
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 26256 W: 1034 L: 906 D: 24316
Ptnml(0-2): 10, 804, 11377, 922, 15

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3363

Bench: 3957653
This commit is contained in:
Vizvezdenec 2021-02-19 10:32:12 +03:00 committed by Stéphane Nicolet
parent a31007c9e7
commit 6294db7514

View file

@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ namespace {
// Step 8. Null move search with verification search (~40 Elo) // Step 8. Null move search with verification search (~40 Elo)
if ( !PvNode if ( !PvNode
&& (ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NULL && (ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NULL
&& (ss-1)->statScore < 22661 && (ss-1)->statScore < 24185
&& eval >= beta && eval >= beta
&& eval >= ss->staticEval && eval >= ss->staticEval
&& ss->staticEval >= beta - 24 * depth - 34 * improving + 162 * ss->ttPv + 159 && ss->staticEval >= beta - 24 * depth - 34 * improving + 162 * ss->ttPv + 159
@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
&& (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] && (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
+ (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
+ (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
+ (*contHist[5])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] / 3 < 26237) + (*contHist[5])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] / 3 < 28255)
continue; continue;
// Prune moves with negative SEE (~20 Elo) // Prune moves with negative SEE (~20 Elo)
@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
|| moveCountPruning || moveCountPruning
|| ss->staticEval + PieceValue[EG][pos.captured_piece()] <= alpha || ss->staticEval + PieceValue[EG][pos.captured_piece()] <= alpha
|| cutNode || cutNode
|| (!PvNode && !formerPv && captureHistory[movedPiece][to_sq(move)][type_of(pos.captured_piece())] < 4506) || (!PvNode && !formerPv && captureHistory[movedPiece][to_sq(move)][type_of(pos.captured_piece())] < 3678)
|| thisThread->ttHitAverage < 432 * TtHitAverageResolution * TtHitAverageWindow / 1024)) || thisThread->ttHitAverage < 432 * TtHitAverageResolution * TtHitAverageWindow / 1024))
{ {
Depth r = reduction(improving, depth, moveCount); Depth r = reduction(improving, depth, moveCount);
@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
+ (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
+ (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
+ (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] + (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
- 5337; - 4741;
// Decrease/increase reduction by comparing opponent's stat score (~10 Elo) // Decrease/increase reduction by comparing opponent's stat score (~10 Elo)
if (ss->statScore >= -89 && (ss-1)->statScore < -116) if (ss->statScore >= -89 && (ss-1)->statScore < -116)
@ -1246,9 +1246,9 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts from here
// use sum of main history and first continuation history with an offset // use sum of main history and first continuation history with an offset
if (ss->inCheck) if (ss->inCheck)
r -= (thisThread->mainHistory[us][from_to(move)] r -= (thisThread->mainHistory[us][from_to(move)]
+ (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] - 4341) / 16384; + (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] - 3833) / 16384;
else else
r -= ss->statScore / 14382; r -= ss->statScore / 14790;
} }
Depth d = std::clamp(newDepth - r, 1, newDepth); Depth d = std::clamp(newDepth - r, 1, newDepth);