mirror of
https://github.com/sockspls/badfish
synced 2025-04-29 16:23:09 +00:00
No need to test for MOVE_NONE before move_is_ok()
Function move_is_ok() already catches the move == MOVE_NONE case. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6bc16f3ff1
commit
63a04134d0
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -1549,8 +1549,8 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
|
|||
Piece p1, p2;
|
||||
Square ksq;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(m1 && move_is_ok(m1));
|
||||
assert(m2 && move_is_ok(m2));
|
||||
assert(move_is_ok(m1));
|
||||
assert(move_is_ok(m2));
|
||||
|
||||
// Case 1: The moving piece is the same in both moves
|
||||
f2 = move_from(m2);
|
||||
|
@ -1626,7 +1626,7 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
|
|||
bool connected_threat(const Position& pos, Move m, Move threat) {
|
||||
|
||||
assert(move_is_ok(m));
|
||||
assert(threat && move_is_ok(threat));
|
||||
assert(move_is_ok(threat));
|
||||
assert(!pos.move_is_capture_or_promotion(m));
|
||||
assert(!pos.move_is_passed_pawn_push(m));
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue