kate/BadFish
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sockspls/badfish synced 2025-04-30 08:43:09 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Use predicted depth for history pruning

Browse source 
STC: (Yellow)
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 69115 W: 12880 L: 12797 D: 43438

LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 124163 W: 16923 L: 16442 D: 90798

Note: Note based off past experiments / patches... history pruning
is quite TC sensitive. I believe the reason for this TC dependency
is that the CMH/FMH is a very large table that takes time to fill
up with. In addition having more time for will increase the accuracy
of the stats' value.

Bench: 7351698
This commit is contained in:
VoyagerOne 2016-08-12 13:55:12 -04:00 • committed by Marco Costalba
parent 3d10cfcdd2
commit 7396c08b79
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
src/search.cpp
View file

@ -915,16 +915,16 @@ moves_loop: // When in check search starts from here
if (moveCountPruning) if (moveCountPruning)
continue; continue;
predictedDepth = std::max(newDepth - reduction<PvNode>(improving, depth, moveCount), DEPTH_ZERO);
// Countermoves based pruning // Countermoves based pruning
if ( depth <= 4 * ONE_PLY if ( predictedDepth < 3 * ONE_PLY
&& move != ss->killers[0] && move != ss->killers[0]
&& (!cmh || (*cmh )[moved_piece][to_sq(move)] < VALUE_ZERO) && (!cmh || (*cmh )[moved_piece][to_sq(move)] < VALUE_ZERO)
&& (!fmh || (*fmh )[moved_piece][to_sq(move)] < VALUE_ZERO) && (!fmh || (*fmh )[moved_piece][to_sq(move)] < VALUE_ZERO)
&& (!fmh2 || (*fmh2)[moved_piece][to_sq(move)] < VALUE_ZERO || (cmh && fmh))) && (!fmh2 || (*fmh2)[moved_piece][to_sq(move)] < VALUE_ZERO || (cmh && fmh)))
continue; continue;
predictedDepth = std::max(newDepth - reduction<PvNode>(improving, depth, moveCount), DEPTH_ZERO);
// Futility pruning: parent node // Futility pruning: parent node
if ( predictedDepth < 7 * ONE_PLY if ( predictedDepth < 7 * ONE_PLY
&& ss->staticEval + 256 + 200 * predictedDepth / ONE_PLY <= alpha) && ss->staticEval + 256 + 200 * predictedDepth / ONE_PLY <= alpha)