mirror of
https://github.com/sockspls/badfish
synced 2025-06-28 00:19:50 +00:00
Tune search at very long time control
This patch is a result of tuning done by user @candirufish after 150k games. Since the tuned values were really interesting and touched heuristics that are known for their non-linear scaling I decided to run limited games LTC match, even if the STC test was really bad (which was expected). After seeing the results of the LTC match, I also run a VLTC (very long time control) SPRTtest, which passed. The main difference is in extensions: this patch allows much more singular/double extensions, both in terms of allowing them at lower depths and with lesser margins. Failed STC: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620d66643ec80158c0cd3b46 LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50> Total: 4968 W: 1194 L: 1398 D: 2376 Ptnml(0-2): 47, 633, 1294, 497, 13 Performed well at LTC in a fixed-length match: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620d66823ec80158c0cd3b4a ELO: 3.36 +-1.8 (95%) LOS: 100.0% Total: 30000 W: 7966 L: 7676 D: 14358 Ptnml(0-2): 36, 2936, 8755, 3248, 25 Passed VLTC SPRT test: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/620da11a26f5b17ec884f939 LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00> Total: 4400 W: 1326 L: 1127 D: 1947 Ptnml(0-2): 13, 309, 1348, 526, 4 closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3937 Bench: 6318903
This commit is contained in:
parent
3ec6e1d245
commit
84b1940fca
1 changed files with 44 additions and 44 deletions
|
@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Futility margin
|
// Futility margin
|
||||||
Value futility_margin(Depth d, bool improving) {
|
Value futility_margin(Depth d, bool improving) {
|
||||||
return Value(147 * (d - improving));
|
return Value(168 * (d - improving));
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Reductions lookup table, initialized at startup
|
// Reductions lookup table, initialized at startup
|
||||||
|
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Depth reduction(bool i, Depth d, int mn, Value delta, Value rootDelta) {
|
Depth reduction(bool i, Depth d, int mn, Value delta, Value rootDelta) {
|
||||||
int r = Reductions[d] * Reductions[mn];
|
int r = Reductions[d] * Reductions[mn];
|
||||||
return (r + 1627 - int(delta) * 1024 / int(rootDelta)) / 1024 + (!i && r > 992);
|
return (r + 1463 - int(delta) * 1024 / int(rootDelta)) / 1024 + (!i && r > 1010);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
constexpr int futility_move_count(bool improving, Depth depth) {
|
constexpr int futility_move_count(bool improving, Depth depth) {
|
||||||
|
@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// History and stats update bonus, based on depth
|
// History and stats update bonus, based on depth
|
||||||
int stat_bonus(Depth d) {
|
int stat_bonus(Depth d) {
|
||||||
return std::min((8 * d + 281) * d - 241 , 1949);
|
return std::min((9 * d + 270) * d - 311 , 2145);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Add a small random component to draw evaluations to avoid 3-fold blindness
|
// Add a small random component to draw evaluations to avoid 3-fold blindness
|
||||||
|
@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
void Search::init() {
|
void Search::init() {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (int i = 1; i < MAX_MOVES; ++i)
|
for (int i = 1; i < MAX_MOVES; ++i)
|
||||||
Reductions[i] = int((21.14 + std::log(Threads.size()) / 2) * std::log(i));
|
Reductions[i] = int((20.81 + std::log(Threads.size()) / 2) * std::log(i));
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -303,10 +303,10 @@ void Thread::search() {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
multiPV = std::min(multiPV, rootMoves.size());
|
multiPV = std::min(multiPV, rootMoves.size());
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
complexityAverage.set(211, 1);
|
complexityAverage.set(202, 1);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
trend = SCORE_ZERO;
|
trend = SCORE_ZERO;
|
||||||
optimism[ us] = Value(33);
|
optimism[ us] = Value(39);
|
||||||
optimism[~us] = -optimism[us];
|
optimism[~us] = -optimism[us];
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int searchAgainCounter = 0;
|
int searchAgainCounter = 0;
|
||||||
|
@ -349,16 +349,16 @@ void Thread::search() {
|
||||||
if (rootDepth >= 4)
|
if (rootDepth >= 4)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
Value prev = rootMoves[pvIdx].averageScore;
|
Value prev = rootMoves[pvIdx].averageScore;
|
||||||
delta = Value(19) + int(prev) * prev / 18321;
|
delta = Value(16) + int(prev) * prev / 19178;
|
||||||
alpha = std::max(prev - delta,-VALUE_INFINITE);
|
alpha = std::max(prev - delta,-VALUE_INFINITE);
|
||||||
beta = std::min(prev + delta, VALUE_INFINITE);
|
beta = std::min(prev + delta, VALUE_INFINITE);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Adjust trend and optimism based on root move's previousScore
|
// Adjust trend and optimism based on root move's previousScore
|
||||||
int tr = sigmoid(prev, 4, 11, 92, 119, 1);
|
int tr = sigmoid(prev, 3, 8, 90, 125, 1);
|
||||||
trend = (us == WHITE ? make_score(tr, tr / 2)
|
trend = (us == WHITE ? make_score(tr, tr / 2)
|
||||||
: -make_score(tr, tr / 2));
|
: -make_score(tr, tr / 2));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int opt = sigmoid(prev, 9, 18, 115, 12250, 187);
|
int opt = sigmoid(prev, 8, 17, 144, 13966, 183);
|
||||||
optimism[ us] = Value(opt);
|
optimism[ us] = Value(opt);
|
||||||
optimism[~us] = -optimism[us];
|
optimism[~us] = -optimism[us];
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -459,17 +459,17 @@ void Thread::search() {
|
||||||
&& !Threads.stop
|
&& !Threads.stop
|
||||||
&& !mainThread->stopOnPonderhit)
|
&& !mainThread->stopOnPonderhit)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
double fallingEval = (66 + 12 * (mainThread->bestPreviousAverageScore - bestValue)
|
double fallingEval = (69 + 12 * (mainThread->bestPreviousAverageScore - bestValue)
|
||||||
+ 6 * (mainThread->iterValue[iterIdx] - bestValue)) / 809.70;
|
+ 6 * (mainThread->iterValue[iterIdx] - bestValue)) / 781.4;
|
||||||
fallingEval = std::clamp(fallingEval, 0.5, 1.5);
|
fallingEval = std::clamp(fallingEval, 0.5, 1.5);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// If the bestMove is stable over several iterations, reduce time accordingly
|
// If the bestMove is stable over several iterations, reduce time accordingly
|
||||||
timeReduction = lastBestMoveDepth + 8 < completedDepth ? 1.73 : 0.94;
|
timeReduction = lastBestMoveDepth + 10 < completedDepth ? 1.63 : 0.73;
|
||||||
double reduction = (1.66 + mainThread->previousTimeReduction) / (2.35 * timeReduction);
|
double reduction = (1.56 + mainThread->previousTimeReduction) / (2.20 * timeReduction);
|
||||||
double bestMoveInstability = 1.073 + std::max(1.0, 2.25 - 9.9 / rootDepth)
|
double bestMoveInstability = 1.073 + std::max(1.0, 2.25 - 9.9 / rootDepth)
|
||||||
* totBestMoveChanges / Threads.size();
|
* totBestMoveChanges / Threads.size();
|
||||||
int complexity = mainThread->complexityAverage.value();
|
int complexity = mainThread->complexityAverage.value();
|
||||||
double complexPosition = std::clamp(1.0 + (complexity - 293) / 1525.0, 0.5, 1.5);
|
double complexPosition = std::clamp(1.0 + (complexity - 326) / 1618.1, 0.5, 1.5);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
double totalTime = Time.optimum() * fallingEval * reduction * bestMoveInstability * complexPosition;
|
double totalTime = Time.optimum() * fallingEval * reduction * bestMoveInstability * complexPosition;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ void Thread::search() {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
else if ( Threads.increaseDepth
|
else if ( Threads.increaseDepth
|
||||||
&& !mainThread->ponder
|
&& !mainThread->ponder
|
||||||
&& Time.elapsed() > totalTime * 0.49)
|
&& Time.elapsed() > totalTime * 0.43)
|
||||||
Threads.increaseDepth = false;
|
Threads.increaseDepth = false;
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
Threads.increaseDepth = true;
|
Threads.increaseDepth = true;
|
||||||
|
@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
// margin and the improving flag are used in various pruning heuristics.
|
// margin and the improving flag are used in various pruning heuristics.
|
||||||
improvement = (ss-2)->staticEval != VALUE_NONE ? ss->staticEval - (ss-2)->staticEval
|
improvement = (ss-2)->staticEval != VALUE_NONE ? ss->staticEval - (ss-2)->staticEval
|
||||||
: (ss-4)->staticEval != VALUE_NONE ? ss->staticEval - (ss-4)->staticEval
|
: (ss-4)->staticEval != VALUE_NONE ? ss->staticEval - (ss-4)->staticEval
|
||||||
: 184;
|
: 175;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
improving = improvement > 0;
|
improving = improvement > 0;
|
||||||
complexity = abs(ss->staticEval - (us == WHITE ? eg_value(pos.psq_score()) : -eg_value(pos.psq_score())));
|
complexity = abs(ss->staticEval - (us == WHITE ? eg_value(pos.psq_score()) : -eg_value(pos.psq_score())));
|
||||||
|
@ -777,8 +777,8 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
// If eval is really low check with qsearch if it can exceed alpha, if it can't,
|
// If eval is really low check with qsearch if it can exceed alpha, if it can't,
|
||||||
// return a fail low.
|
// return a fail low.
|
||||||
if ( !PvNode
|
if ( !PvNode
|
||||||
&& depth <= 6
|
&& depth <= 7
|
||||||
&& eval < alpha - 486 - 314 * depth * depth)
|
&& eval < alpha - 348 - 258 * depth * depth)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
value = qsearch<NonPV>(pos, ss, alpha - 1, alpha);
|
value = qsearch<NonPV>(pos, ss, alpha - 1, alpha);
|
||||||
if (value < alpha)
|
if (value < alpha)
|
||||||
|
@ -791,16 +791,16 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
&& depth < 8
|
&& depth < 8
|
||||||
&& eval - futility_margin(depth, improving) - (ss-1)->statScore / 256 >= beta
|
&& eval - futility_margin(depth, improving) - (ss-1)->statScore / 256 >= beta
|
||||||
&& eval >= beta
|
&& eval >= beta
|
||||||
&& eval < 22266) // larger than VALUE_KNOWN_WIN, but smaller than TB wins.
|
&& eval < 26305) // larger than VALUE_KNOWN_WIN, but smaller than TB wins.
|
||||||
return eval;
|
return eval;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Step 9. Null move search with verification search (~22 Elo)
|
// Step 9. Null move search with verification search (~22 Elo)
|
||||||
if ( !PvNode
|
if ( !PvNode
|
||||||
&& (ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NULL
|
&& (ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NULL
|
||||||
&& (ss-1)->statScore < 15075
|
&& (ss-1)->statScore < 14695
|
||||||
&& eval >= beta
|
&& eval >= beta
|
||||||
&& eval >= ss->staticEval
|
&& eval >= ss->staticEval
|
||||||
&& ss->staticEval >= beta - 18 * depth - improvement / 19 + 215 + complexity / 30
|
&& ss->staticEval >= beta - 15 * depth - improvement / 15 + 198 + complexity / 28
|
||||||
&& !excludedMove
|
&& !excludedMove
|
||||||
&& pos.non_pawn_material(us)
|
&& pos.non_pawn_material(us)
|
||||||
&& (ss->ply >= thisThread->nmpMinPly || us != thisThread->nmpColor))
|
&& (ss->ply >= thisThread->nmpMinPly || us != thisThread->nmpColor))
|
||||||
|
@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
assert(eval - beta >= 0);
|
assert(eval - beta >= 0);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Null move dynamic reduction based on depth, eval and complexity of position
|
// Null move dynamic reduction based on depth, eval and complexity of position
|
||||||
Depth R = std::min(int(eval - beta) / 184, 4) + depth / 3 + 4 - (complexity > 799);
|
Depth R = std::min(int(eval - beta) / 147, 5) + depth / 3 + 4 - (complexity > 753);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ss->currentMove = MOVE_NULL;
|
ss->currentMove = MOVE_NULL;
|
||||||
ss->continuationHistory = &thisThread->continuationHistory[0][0][NO_PIECE][0];
|
ss->continuationHistory = &thisThread->continuationHistory[0][0][NO_PIECE][0];
|
||||||
|
@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
probCutBeta = beta + 204 - 52 * improving;
|
probCutBeta = beta + 179 - 46 * improving;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Step 10. ProbCut (~4 Elo)
|
// Step 10. ProbCut (~4 Elo)
|
||||||
// If we have a good enough capture and a reduced search returns a value
|
// If we have a good enough capture and a reduced search returns a value
|
||||||
|
@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Step 12. A small Probcut idea, when we are in check (~0 Elo)
|
// Step 12. A small Probcut idea, when we are in check (~0 Elo)
|
||||||
probCutBeta = beta + 401;
|
probCutBeta = beta + 481;
|
||||||
if ( ss->inCheck
|
if ( ss->inCheck
|
||||||
&& !PvNode
|
&& !PvNode
|
||||||
&& depth >= 2
|
&& depth >= 2
|
||||||
|
@ -1014,14 +1014,14 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
if ( !pos.empty(to_sq(move))
|
if ( !pos.empty(to_sq(move))
|
||||||
&& !givesCheck
|
&& !givesCheck
|
||||||
&& !PvNode
|
&& !PvNode
|
||||||
&& lmrDepth < 7
|
&& lmrDepth < 6
|
||||||
&& !ss->inCheck
|
&& !ss->inCheck
|
||||||
&& ss->staticEval + 424 + 138 * lmrDepth + PieceValue[EG][pos.piece_on(to_sq(move))]
|
&& ss->staticEval + 281 + 179 * lmrDepth + PieceValue[EG][pos.piece_on(to_sq(move))]
|
||||||
+ captureHistory[movedPiece][to_sq(move)][type_of(pos.piece_on(to_sq(move)))] / 7 < alpha)
|
+ captureHistory[movedPiece][to_sq(move)][type_of(pos.piece_on(to_sq(move)))] / 6 < alpha)
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// SEE based pruning (~9 Elo)
|
// SEE based pruning (~9 Elo)
|
||||||
if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-214) * depth))
|
if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-203) * depth))
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
|
@ -1040,11 +1040,11 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
// Futility pruning: parent node (~9 Elo)
|
// Futility pruning: parent node (~9 Elo)
|
||||||
if ( !ss->inCheck
|
if ( !ss->inCheck
|
||||||
&& lmrDepth < 11
|
&& lmrDepth < 11
|
||||||
&& ss->staticEval + 147 + 125 * lmrDepth + history / 64 <= alpha)
|
&& ss->staticEval + 122 + 138 * lmrDepth + history / 60 <= alpha)
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Prune moves with negative SEE (~3 Elo)
|
// Prune moves with negative SEE (~3 Elo)
|
||||||
if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-23 * lmrDepth * lmrDepth - 31 * lmrDepth)))
|
if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-25 * lmrDepth * lmrDepth - 20 * lmrDepth)))
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
// a reduced search on all the other moves but the ttMove and if the
|
// a reduced search on all the other moves but the ttMove and if the
|
||||||
// result is lower than ttValue minus a margin, then we will extend the ttMove.
|
// result is lower than ttValue minus a margin, then we will extend the ttMove.
|
||||||
if ( !rootNode
|
if ( !rootNode
|
||||||
&& depth >= 6 + 2 * (PvNode && tte->is_pv())
|
&& depth >= 4 + 2 * (PvNode && tte->is_pv())
|
||||||
&& move == ttMove
|
&& move == ttMove
|
||||||
&& !excludedMove // Avoid recursive singular search
|
&& !excludedMove // Avoid recursive singular search
|
||||||
/* && ttValue != VALUE_NONE Already implicit in the next condition */
|
/* && ttValue != VALUE_NONE Already implicit in the next condition */
|
||||||
|
@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
&& (tte->bound() & BOUND_LOWER)
|
&& (tte->bound() & BOUND_LOWER)
|
||||||
&& tte->depth() >= depth - 3)
|
&& tte->depth() >= depth - 3)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
Value singularBeta = ttValue - 4 * depth;
|
Value singularBeta = ttValue - 3 * depth;
|
||||||
Depth singularDepth = (depth - 1) / 2;
|
Depth singularDepth = (depth - 1) / 2;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ss->excludedMove = move;
|
ss->excludedMove = move;
|
||||||
|
@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Avoid search explosion by limiting the number of double extensions
|
// Avoid search explosion by limiting the number of double extensions
|
||||||
if ( !PvNode
|
if ( !PvNode
|
||||||
&& value < singularBeta - 52
|
&& value < singularBeta - 26
|
||||||
&& ss->doubleExtensions <= 8)
|
&& ss->doubleExtensions <= 8)
|
||||||
extension = 2;
|
extension = 2;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -1100,15 +1100,15 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Check extensions (~1 Elo)
|
// Check extensions (~1 Elo)
|
||||||
else if ( givesCheck
|
else if ( givesCheck
|
||||||
&& depth > 8
|
&& depth > 9
|
||||||
&& abs(ss->staticEval) > 81)
|
&& abs(ss->staticEval) > 71)
|
||||||
extension = 1;
|
extension = 1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Quiet ttMove extensions (~0 Elo)
|
// Quiet ttMove extensions (~0 Elo)
|
||||||
else if ( PvNode
|
else if ( PvNode
|
||||||
&& move == ttMove
|
&& move == ttMove
|
||||||
&& move == ss->killers[0]
|
&& move == ss->killers[0]
|
||||||
&& (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] >= 7546)
|
&& (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] >= 5491)
|
||||||
extension = 1;
|
extension = 1;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -1170,18 +1170,18 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
+ (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
+ (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
||||||
+ (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
+ (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
||||||
+ (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
+ (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
||||||
- 4123;
|
- 4334;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Decrease/increase reduction for moves with a good/bad history (~30 Elo)
|
// Decrease/increase reduction for moves with a good/bad history (~30 Elo)
|
||||||
r -= ss->statScore / 17417;
|
r -= ss->statScore / 15914;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// In general we want to cap the LMR depth search at newDepth. But if reductions
|
// In general we want to cap the LMR depth search at newDepth. But if reductions
|
||||||
// are really negative and movecount is low, we allow this move to be searched
|
// are really negative and movecount is low, we allow this move to be searched
|
||||||
// deeper than the first move (this may lead to hidden double extensions).
|
// deeper than the first move (this may lead to hidden double extensions).
|
||||||
int deeper = r >= -1 ? 0
|
int deeper = r >= -1 ? 0
|
||||||
: moveCount <= 5 ? 2
|
: moveCount <= 4 ? 2
|
||||||
: PvNode && depth > 3 ? 1
|
: PvNode && depth > 4 ? 1
|
||||||
: cutNode && moveCount <= 7 ? 1
|
: cutNode && moveCount <= 8 ? 1
|
||||||
: 0;
|
: 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Depth d = std::clamp(newDepth - r, 1, newDepth + deeper);
|
Depth d = std::clamp(newDepth - r, 1, newDepth + deeper);
|
||||||
|
@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// If the son is reduced and fails high it will be re-searched at full depth
|
// If the son is reduced and fails high it will be re-searched at full depth
|
||||||
doFullDepthSearch = value > alpha && d < newDepth;
|
doFullDepthSearch = value > alpha && d < newDepth;
|
||||||
doDeeperSearch = value > (alpha + 76 + 11 * (newDepth - d));
|
doDeeperSearch = value > (alpha + 78 + 11 * (newDepth - d));
|
||||||
didLMR = true;
|
didLMR = true;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
|
@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
//or fail low was really bad
|
//or fail low was really bad
|
||||||
bool extraBonus = PvNode
|
bool extraBonus = PvNode
|
||||||
|| cutNode
|
|| cutNode
|
||||||
|| bestValue < alpha - 71 * depth;
|
|| bestValue < alpha - 70 * depth;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
update_continuation_histories(ss-1, pos.piece_on(prevSq), prevSq, stat_bonus(depth) * (1 + extraBonus));
|
update_continuation_histories(ss-1, pos.piece_on(prevSq), prevSq, stat_bonus(depth) * (1 + extraBonus));
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -1473,7 +1473,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
if (PvNode && bestValue > alpha)
|
if (PvNode && bestValue > alpha)
|
||||||
alpha = bestValue;
|
alpha = bestValue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
futilityBase = bestValue + 139;
|
futilityBase = bestValue + 118;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
const PieceToHistory* contHist[] = { (ss-1)->continuationHistory, (ss-2)->continuationHistory,
|
const PieceToHistory* contHist[] = { (ss-1)->continuationHistory, (ss-2)->continuationHistory,
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue