mirror of
https://github.com/sockspls/badfish
synced 2025-07-11 03:29:14 +00:00
Temporary revert previous patch
Performs well at very short TC of 40/4+0.05 (courtesy of Jean-Francois): Wins: 2503 Losses: 2146 Draws: 5581 Total: 10230 +12 ELO But is poor at longer TC of 20"+0.05 Wins: 321 Losses: 373 Draws: 1141 Total: 1808 -10 ELO The patch was clearly a tradoff between speed and accuracy and the most interesting part of it are test results that can be commented as follows: - A short TC is very sensible to any speed increase - A longer TC is more sensible to accuracy and less to speed So a patch that does not change speed is suitable to be tested at short TC, while a speed/accuracy compromise patch is IMO better to be tested at longer TC to verify loss of accuracy can be tolerated. In this case the revert is only temporary. We will come back again once we will be able to preserve the evaluation margin. bench: 5809010
This commit is contained in:
parent
37e9802411
commit
a5b1f4774f
1 changed files with 0 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -1154,11 +1154,6 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
|
|||
if (ss->staticEval == VALUE_NONE || ss->evalMargin == VALUE_NONE) // Due to a race
|
||||
ss->staticEval = bestValue = evaluate(pos, ss->evalMargin);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if ((ss-1)->currentMove == MOVE_NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ss->staticEval = bestValue = -(ss-1)->staticEval;
|
||||
ss->evalMargin = VALUE_ZERO; // Hack, we really don't know the value
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
ss->staticEval = bestValue = evaluate(pos, ss->evalMargin);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue