kate/BadFish
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sockspls/badfish synced 2025-04-30 00:33:09 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Update comment on why we call root search with ss+1

Browse source 
No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Marco Costalba 2011-08-06 11:19:13 +01:00
parent b9f8cb7837
commit cd27ed9a74
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
src/search.cpp
View file

@ -560,7 +560,8 @@ namespace {
// Start with a small aspiration window and, in case of fail high/low,
// research with bigger window until not failing high/low anymore.
do {
// Search starting from ss+1 to allow calling update_gains()
// Search starting from ss+1 to allow referencing (ss-1). This is
// needed by update_gains() and ss copy when splitting at Root.
value = search<Root>(pos, ss+1, alpha, beta, depth * ONE_PLY);
// It is critical that sorting is done with a stable algorithm
@ -1170,7 +1171,6 @@ split_point_start: // At split points actual search starts from here
alpha = sp->alpha;
}
// Finished searching the move. If StopRequest is true, the search
// was aborted because the user interrupted the search or because we
// ran out of time. In this case, the return value of the search cannot
@ -2211,6 +2211,8 @@ void ThreadsManager::idle_loop(int threadID, SplitPoint* sp) {
search<SplitPointPV>(pos, ss+1, tsp->alpha, tsp->beta, tsp->depth);
else if (tsp->nodeType == NonPV)
search<SplitPointNonPV>(pos, ss+1, tsp->alpha, tsp->beta, tsp->depth);
else
assert(false);
assert(threads[threadID].state == Thread::SEARCHING);