mirror of
https://github.com/sockspls/badfish
synced 2025-04-29 16:23:09 +00:00
Delay SEE for scoring captures
Do not calculate SEE on all the moves in MovePicker::score_captures() but delay until pick_move_from_list() when only the best ones are double checked against their see value. If a beta cut-off occurs then we avoid calculating SEE on all the moves, but just the picked ones. Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
55b6464d40
commit
d087b0a34a
1 changed files with 18 additions and 28 deletions
|
@ -206,27 +206,22 @@ void MovePicker::score_captures() {
|
|||
// Suprisingly, this appears to perform slightly better than SEE based
|
||||
// move ordering. The reason is probably that in a position with a winning
|
||||
// capture, capturing a more valuable (but sufficiently defended) piece
|
||||
// first usually doesn't hurt. The opponent will have to recapture, and
|
||||
// first usually doesn't hurt. The opponent will have to recapture, and
|
||||
// the hanging piece will still be hanging (except in the unusual cases
|
||||
// where it is possible to recapture with the hanging piece). Exchanging
|
||||
// big pieces before capturing a hanging piece probably helps to reduce
|
||||
// the subtree size.
|
||||
// the subtree size. Instead of calculating SEE here to filter out
|
||||
// loosing captures, we delay the filtering in pick_move_from_list()
|
||||
Move m;
|
||||
int seeValue;
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < numOfMoves; i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
m = moves[i].move;
|
||||
seeValue = pos.see(m);
|
||||
if (seeValue >= 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (move_promotion(m))
|
||||
moves[i].score = QueenValueMidgame;
|
||||
else
|
||||
moves[i].score = int(pos.midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(m)))
|
||||
-int(pos.type_of_piece_on(move_from(m)));
|
||||
} else
|
||||
moves[i].score = seeValue;
|
||||
if (move_promotion(m))
|
||||
moves[i].score = QueenValueMidgame;
|
||||
else
|
||||
moves[i].score = int(pos.midgame_value_of_piece_on(move_to(m)))
|
||||
-int(pos.type_of_piece_on(move_from(m)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -325,26 +320,21 @@ Move MovePicker::pick_move_from_list() {
|
|||
|
||||
while (movesPicked < numOfMoves)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int bestScore = -10000000;
|
||||
bestIndex = -1;
|
||||
for (int i = movesPicked; i < numOfMoves; i++)
|
||||
bestIndex = find_best_index();
|
||||
|
||||
if (bestIndex != -1) // Found a possibly good capture
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (moves[i].score < 0)
|
||||
move = moves[bestIndex].move;
|
||||
int seeValue = pos.see(move);
|
||||
if (seeValue < 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Losing capture, move it to the badCaptures[] array
|
||||
assert(numOfBadCaptures < 63);
|
||||
badCaptures[numOfBadCaptures++] = moves[i];
|
||||
moves[i--] = moves[--numOfMoves];
|
||||
moves[bestIndex].score = seeValue;
|
||||
badCaptures[numOfBadCaptures++] = moves[bestIndex];
|
||||
moves[bestIndex] = moves[--numOfMoves];
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (moves[i].score > bestScore)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bestIndex = i;
|
||||
bestScore = moves[i].score;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (bestIndex != -1) // Found a good capture
|
||||
{
|
||||
move = moves[bestIndex].move;
|
||||
moves[bestIndex] = moves[movesPicked++];
|
||||
if ( move != ttMove
|
||||
&& move != mateKiller
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue