mirror of
https://github.com/sockspls/badfish
synced 2025-07-11 19:49:14 +00:00
Search tuning at very long time control
Many search parameter changes, tuned (https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/645e4c67d55cccb2e64220ff) at ~300k games @ VLTC (120+1.2). Failed STC: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6465fcd77968ca827c1410c2 LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00> Total: 33824 W: 8863 L: 9067 D: 15894 Ptnml(0-2): 89, 3833, 9266, 3641, 83 Neutral LTC: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/646385ce87f6567dd4df4e37 Elo: -0.48 +-1.2 (95%) LOS: 22.2% Total: 60000 W: 16235 L: 16318 D: 27447 Ptnml(0-2): 27, 5831, 18366, 5750, 26 nElo: -1.08 +-2.8 (95%) PairsRatio: 0.99 Passed VLTC 180+1.8: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/646385f787f6567dd4df4e3e LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50> Total: 126448 W: 34704 L: 34258 D: 57486 Ptnml(0-2): 9, 10970, 40825, 11406, 14 Passed VLTC SMP 60+0.6 8thread: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/646628de884ce93b65df2ac9 LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50> Total: 59456 W: 16791 L: 16487 D: 26178 Ptnml(0-2): 5, 4473, 20467, 4779, 4 closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4574 Bench: 3347573
This commit is contained in:
parent
5f7b26aaa0
commit
f030a1c592
1 changed files with 47 additions and 47 deletions
|
@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Futility margin
|
// Futility margin
|
||||||
Value futility_margin(Depth d, bool improving) {
|
Value futility_margin(Depth d, bool improving) {
|
||||||
return Value(154 * (d - improving));
|
return Value(148 * (d - improving));
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Reductions lookup table, initialized at startup
|
// Reductions lookup table, initialized at startup
|
||||||
|
@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Depth reduction(bool i, Depth d, int mn, Value delta, Value rootDelta) {
|
Depth reduction(bool i, Depth d, int mn, Value delta, Value rootDelta) {
|
||||||
int r = Reductions[d] * Reductions[mn];
|
int r = Reductions[d] * Reductions[mn];
|
||||||
return (r + 1449 - int(delta) * 937 / int(rootDelta)) / 1024 + (!i && r > 941);
|
return (r + 1356 - int(delta) * 983 / int(rootDelta)) / 1024 + (!i && r > 901);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
constexpr int futility_move_count(bool improving, Depth depth) {
|
constexpr int futility_move_count(bool improving, Depth depth) {
|
||||||
|
@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// History and stats update bonus, based on depth
|
// History and stats update bonus, based on depth
|
||||||
int stat_bonus(Depth d) {
|
int stat_bonus(Depth d) {
|
||||||
return std::min(341 * d - 470, 1710);
|
return std::min(337 * d - 497, 1632);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Add a small random component to draw evaluations to avoid 3-fold blindness
|
// Add a small random component to draw evaluations to avoid 3-fold blindness
|
||||||
|
@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
void Search::init() {
|
void Search::init() {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (int i = 1; i < MAX_MOVES; ++i)
|
for (int i = 1; i < MAX_MOVES; ++i)
|
||||||
Reductions[i] = int((19.47 + std::log(Threads.size()) / 2) * std::log(i));
|
Reductions[i] = int((20.89 + std::log(Threads.size()) / 2) * std::log(i));
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -348,12 +348,12 @@ void Thread::search() {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Reset aspiration window starting size
|
// Reset aspiration window starting size
|
||||||
Value prev = rootMoves[pvIdx].averageScore;
|
Value prev = rootMoves[pvIdx].averageScore;
|
||||||
delta = Value(10) + int(prev) * prev / 16502;
|
delta = Value(11) + int(prev) * prev / 15368;
|
||||||
alpha = std::max(prev - delta,-VALUE_INFINITE);
|
alpha = std::max(prev - delta,-VALUE_INFINITE);
|
||||||
beta = std::min(prev + delta, VALUE_INFINITE);
|
beta = std::min(prev + delta, VALUE_INFINITE);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Adjust optimism based on root move's previousScore
|
// Adjust optimism based on root move's previousScore
|
||||||
int opt = 102 * prev / (std::abs(prev) + 147);
|
int opt = 116 * prev / (std::abs(prev) + 143);
|
||||||
optimism[ us] = Value(opt);
|
optimism[ us] = Value(opt);
|
||||||
optimism[~us] = -optimism[us];
|
optimism[~us] = -optimism[us];
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
// Use static evaluation difference to improve quiet move ordering (~4 Elo)
|
// Use static evaluation difference to improve quiet move ordering (~4 Elo)
|
||||||
if (is_ok((ss-1)->currentMove) && !(ss-1)->inCheck && !priorCapture)
|
if (is_ok((ss-1)->currentMove) && !(ss-1)->inCheck && !priorCapture)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int bonus = std::clamp(-19 * int((ss-1)->staticEval + ss->staticEval), -1920, 1920);
|
int bonus = std::clamp(-19 * int((ss-1)->staticEval + ss->staticEval), -1717, 1717);
|
||||||
thisThread->mainHistory[~us][from_to((ss-1)->currentMove)] << bonus;
|
thisThread->mainHistory[~us][from_to((ss-1)->currentMove)] << bonus;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -752,13 +752,13 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
// margin and the improving flag are used in various pruning heuristics.
|
// margin and the improving flag are used in various pruning heuristics.
|
||||||
improvement = (ss-2)->staticEval != VALUE_NONE ? ss->staticEval - (ss-2)->staticEval
|
improvement = (ss-2)->staticEval != VALUE_NONE ? ss->staticEval - (ss-2)->staticEval
|
||||||
: (ss-4)->staticEval != VALUE_NONE ? ss->staticEval - (ss-4)->staticEval
|
: (ss-4)->staticEval != VALUE_NONE ? ss->staticEval - (ss-4)->staticEval
|
||||||
: 156;
|
: 163;
|
||||||
improving = improvement > 0;
|
improving = improvement > 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Step 7. Razoring (~1 Elo).
|
// Step 7. Razoring (~1 Elo).
|
||||||
// If eval is really low check with qsearch if it can exceed alpha, if it can't,
|
// If eval is really low check with qsearch if it can exceed alpha, if it can't,
|
||||||
// return a fail low.
|
// return a fail low.
|
||||||
if (eval < alpha - 426 - 256 * depth * depth)
|
if (eval < alpha - 467 - 266 * depth * depth)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
value = qsearch<NonPV>(pos, ss, alpha - 1, alpha);
|
value = qsearch<NonPV>(pos, ss, alpha - 1, alpha);
|
||||||
if (value < alpha)
|
if (value < alpha)
|
||||||
|
@ -769,18 +769,18 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
// The depth condition is important for mate finding.
|
// The depth condition is important for mate finding.
|
||||||
if ( !ss->ttPv
|
if ( !ss->ttPv
|
||||||
&& depth < 9
|
&& depth < 9
|
||||||
&& eval - futility_margin(depth, improving) - (ss-1)->statScore / 280 >= beta
|
&& eval - futility_margin(depth, improving) - (ss-1)->statScore / 306 >= beta
|
||||||
&& eval >= beta
|
&& eval >= beta
|
||||||
&& eval < 25128) // larger than VALUE_KNOWN_WIN, but smaller than TB wins
|
&& eval < 22761) // larger than VALUE_KNOWN_WIN, but smaller than TB wins
|
||||||
return eval;
|
return eval;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Step 9. Null move search with verification search (~35 Elo)
|
// Step 9. Null move search with verification search (~35 Elo)
|
||||||
if ( !PvNode
|
if ( !PvNode
|
||||||
&& (ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NULL
|
&& (ss-1)->currentMove != MOVE_NULL
|
||||||
&& (ss-1)->statScore < 18755
|
&& (ss-1)->statScore < 18404
|
||||||
&& eval >= beta
|
&& eval >= beta
|
||||||
&& eval >= ss->staticEval
|
&& eval >= ss->staticEval
|
||||||
&& ss->staticEval >= beta - 20 * depth - improvement / 13 + 253
|
&& ss->staticEval >= beta - 19 * depth - improvement / 13 + 257
|
||||||
&& !excludedMove
|
&& !excludedMove
|
||||||
&& pos.non_pawn_material(us)
|
&& pos.non_pawn_material(us)
|
||||||
&& (ss->ply >= thisThread->nmpMinPly))
|
&& (ss->ply >= thisThread->nmpMinPly))
|
||||||
|
@ -823,13 +823,13 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
probCutBeta = beta + 186 - 54 * improving;
|
probCutBeta = beta + 174 - 60 * improving;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Step 10. ProbCut (~10 Elo)
|
// Step 10. ProbCut (~10 Elo)
|
||||||
// If we have a good enough capture (or queen promotion) and a reduced search returns a value
|
// If we have a good enough capture (or queen promotion) and a reduced search returns a value
|
||||||
// much above beta, we can (almost) safely prune the previous move.
|
// much above beta, we can (almost) safely prune the previous move.
|
||||||
if ( !PvNode
|
if ( !PvNode
|
||||||
&& depth > 4
|
&& depth > 3
|
||||||
&& abs(beta) < VALUE_TB_WIN_IN_MAX_PLY
|
&& abs(beta) < VALUE_TB_WIN_IN_MAX_PLY
|
||||||
// if value from transposition table is lower than probCutBeta, don't attempt probCut
|
// if value from transposition table is lower than probCutBeta, don't attempt probCut
|
||||||
// there and in further interactions with transposition table cutoff depth is set to depth - 3
|
// there and in further interactions with transposition table cutoff depth is set to depth - 3
|
||||||
|
@ -887,20 +887,20 @@ namespace {
|
||||||
return qsearch<PV>(pos, ss, alpha, beta);
|
return qsearch<PV>(pos, ss, alpha, beta);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ( cutNode
|
if ( cutNode
|
||||||
&& depth >= 7
|
&& depth >= 8
|
||||||
&& !ttMove)
|
&& !ttMove)
|
||||||
depth -= 2;
|
depth -= 2;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Step 12. A small Probcut idea, when we are in check (~4 Elo)
|
// Step 12. A small Probcut idea, when we are in check (~4 Elo)
|
||||||
probCutBeta = beta + 391;
|
probCutBeta = beta + 430;
|
||||||
if ( ss->inCheck
|
if ( ss->inCheck
|
||||||
&& !PvNode
|
&& !PvNode
|
||||||
&& depth >= 2
|
&& depth >= 2
|
||||||
&& ttCapture
|
&& ttCapture
|
||||||
&& (tte->bound() & BOUND_LOWER)
|
&& (tte->bound() & BOUND_LOWER)
|
||||||
&& tte->depth() >= depth - 3
|
&& tte->depth() >= depth - 4
|
||||||
&& ttValue >= probCutBeta
|
&& ttValue >= probCutBeta
|
||||||
&& abs(ttValue) <= VALUE_KNOWN_WIN
|
&& abs(ttValue) <= VALUE_KNOWN_WIN
|
||||||
&& abs(beta) <= VALUE_KNOWN_WIN)
|
&& abs(beta) <= VALUE_KNOWN_WIN)
|
||||||
|
@ -986,15 +986,15 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
// Futility pruning for captures (~2 Elo)
|
// Futility pruning for captures (~2 Elo)
|
||||||
if ( !givesCheck
|
if ( !givesCheck
|
||||||
&& lmrDepth < 6
|
&& lmrDepth < 7
|
||||||
&& !ss->inCheck
|
&& !ss->inCheck
|
||||||
&& ss->staticEval + 182 + 230 * lmrDepth + PieceValue[EG][pos.piece_on(to_sq(move))]
|
&& ss->staticEval + 207 + 223 * lmrDepth + PieceValue[EG][pos.piece_on(to_sq(move))]
|
||||||
+ captureHistory[movedPiece][to_sq(move)][type_of(pos.piece_on(to_sq(move)))] / 7 < alpha)
|
+ captureHistory[movedPiece][to_sq(move)][type_of(pos.piece_on(to_sq(move)))] * 1078 / 7000 < alpha)
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Bitboard occupied;
|
Bitboard occupied;
|
||||||
// SEE based pruning (~11 Elo)
|
// SEE based pruning (~11 Elo)
|
||||||
if (!pos.see_ge(move, occupied, Value(-206) * depth))
|
if (!pos.see_ge(move, occupied, Value(-205) * depth))
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
if (depth < 2 - capture)
|
if (depth < 2 - capture)
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
@ -1022,24 +1022,24 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Continuation history based pruning (~2 Elo)
|
// Continuation history based pruning (~2 Elo)
|
||||||
if ( lmrDepth < 5
|
if ( lmrDepth < 5
|
||||||
&& history < -4405 * (depth - 1))
|
&& history < -3792 * (depth - 1))
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
history += 2 * thisThread->mainHistory[us][from_to(move)];
|
history += 2 * thisThread->mainHistory[us][from_to(move)];
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
lmrDepth += history / 7278;
|
lmrDepth += history / 7019;
|
||||||
lmrDepth = std::max(lmrDepth, -2);
|
lmrDepth = std::max(lmrDepth, -2);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Futility pruning: parent node (~13 Elo)
|
// Futility pruning: parent node (~13 Elo)
|
||||||
if ( !ss->inCheck
|
if ( !ss->inCheck
|
||||||
&& lmrDepth < 13
|
&& lmrDepth < 12
|
||||||
&& ss->staticEval + 103 + 138 * lmrDepth <= alpha)
|
&& ss->staticEval + 111 + 136 * lmrDepth <= alpha)
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
lmrDepth = std::max(lmrDepth, 0);
|
lmrDepth = std::max(lmrDepth, 0);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Prune moves with negative SEE (~4 Elo)
|
// Prune moves with negative SEE (~4 Elo)
|
||||||
if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-24 * lmrDepth * lmrDepth - 16 * lmrDepth)))
|
if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-27 * lmrDepth * lmrDepth - 33 * lmrDepth / 2)))
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
// a reduced search on all the other moves but the ttMove and if the
|
// a reduced search on all the other moves but the ttMove and if the
|
||||||
// result is lower than ttValue minus a margin, then we will extend the ttMove.
|
// result is lower than ttValue minus a margin, then we will extend the ttMove.
|
||||||
if ( !rootNode
|
if ( !rootNode
|
||||||
&& depth >= 4 - (thisThread->completedDepth > 21) + 2 * (PvNode && tte->is_pv())
|
&& depth >= 4 - (thisThread->completedDepth > 22) + 2 * (PvNode && tte->is_pv())
|
||||||
&& move == ttMove
|
&& move == ttMove
|
||||||
&& !excludedMove // Avoid recursive singular search
|
&& !excludedMove // Avoid recursive singular search
|
||||||
/* && ttValue != VALUE_NONE Already implicit in the next condition */
|
/* && ttValue != VALUE_NONE Already implicit in the next condition */
|
||||||
|
@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
&& (tte->bound() & BOUND_LOWER)
|
&& (tte->bound() & BOUND_LOWER)
|
||||||
&& tte->depth() >= depth - 3)
|
&& tte->depth() >= depth - 3)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
Value singularBeta = ttValue - (3 + 2 * (ss->ttPv && !PvNode)) * depth / 2;
|
Value singularBeta = ttValue - (99 + 65 * (ss->ttPv && !PvNode)) * depth / 64;
|
||||||
Depth singularDepth = (depth - 1) / 2;
|
Depth singularDepth = (depth - 1) / 2;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ss->excludedMove = move;
|
ss->excludedMove = move;
|
||||||
|
@ -1076,8 +1076,8 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Avoid search explosion by limiting the number of double extensions
|
// Avoid search explosion by limiting the number of double extensions
|
||||||
if ( !PvNode
|
if ( !PvNode
|
||||||
&& value < singularBeta - 25
|
&& value < singularBeta - 22
|
||||||
&& ss->doubleExtensions <= 10)
|
&& ss->doubleExtensions <= 11)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
extension = 2;
|
extension = 2;
|
||||||
depth += depth < 13;
|
depth += depth < 13;
|
||||||
|
@ -1107,15 +1107,15 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Check extensions (~1 Elo)
|
// Check extensions (~1 Elo)
|
||||||
else if ( givesCheck
|
else if ( givesCheck
|
||||||
&& depth > 10
|
&& depth > 9
|
||||||
&& abs(ss->staticEval) > 88)
|
&& abs(ss->staticEval) > 87)
|
||||||
extension = 1;
|
extension = 1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Quiet ttMove extensions (~1 Elo)
|
// Quiet ttMove extensions (~1 Elo)
|
||||||
else if ( PvNode
|
else if ( PvNode
|
||||||
&& move == ttMove
|
&& move == ttMove
|
||||||
&& move == ss->killers[0]
|
&& move == ss->killers[0]
|
||||||
&& (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] >= 5705)
|
&& (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)] >= 5480)
|
||||||
extension = 1;
|
extension = 1;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
r -= cutNode && tte->depth() >= depth + 3 ? 3 : 2;
|
r -= cutNode && tte->depth() >= depth + 3 ? 3 : 2;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Decrease reduction if opponent's move count is high (~1 Elo)
|
// Decrease reduction if opponent's move count is high (~1 Elo)
|
||||||
if ((ss-1)->moveCount > 7)
|
if ((ss-1)->moveCount > 8)
|
||||||
r--;
|
r--;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Increase reduction for cut nodes (~3 Elo)
|
// Increase reduction for cut nodes (~3 Elo)
|
||||||
|
@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Decrease reduction for PvNodes based on depth (~2 Elo)
|
// Decrease reduction for PvNodes based on depth (~2 Elo)
|
||||||
if (PvNode)
|
if (PvNode)
|
||||||
r -= 1 + 12 / (3 + depth);
|
r -= 1 + 11 / (3 + depth);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Decrease reduction if ttMove has been singularly extended (~1 Elo)
|
// Decrease reduction if ttMove has been singularly extended (~1 Elo)
|
||||||
if (singularQuietLMR)
|
if (singularQuietLMR)
|
||||||
|
@ -1174,10 +1174,10 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
+ (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
+ (*contHist[0])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
||||||
+ (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
+ (*contHist[1])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
||||||
+ (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
+ (*contHist[3])[movedPiece][to_sq(move)]
|
||||||
- 4082;
|
- 3755;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Decrease/increase reduction for moves with a good/bad history (~25 Elo)
|
// Decrease/increase reduction for moves with a good/bad history (~25 Elo)
|
||||||
r -= ss->statScore / (11079 + 4626 * (depth > 6 && depth < 19));
|
r -= ss->statScore / (10445 + 4762 * (depth > 6 && depth < 21));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Step 17. Late moves reduction / extension (LMR, ~117 Elo)
|
// Step 17. Late moves reduction / extension (LMR, ~117 Elo)
|
||||||
// We use various heuristics for the sons of a node after the first son has
|
// We use various heuristics for the sons of a node after the first son has
|
||||||
|
@ -1201,8 +1201,8 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
// Adjust full depth search based on LMR results - if result
|
// Adjust full depth search based on LMR results - if result
|
||||||
// was good enough search deeper, if it was bad enough search shallower
|
// was good enough search deeper, if it was bad enough search shallower
|
||||||
const bool doDeeperSearch = value > (bestValue + 68 + 12 * (newDepth - d));
|
const bool doDeeperSearch = value > (bestValue + 63 + 11 * (newDepth - d));
|
||||||
const bool doEvenDeeperSearch = value > alpha + 588 && ss->doubleExtensions <= 5;
|
const bool doEvenDeeperSearch = value > alpha + 662 && ss->doubleExtensions <= 6;
|
||||||
const bool doShallowerSearch = value < bestValue + newDepth;
|
const bool doShallowerSearch = value < bestValue + newDepth;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ss->doubleExtensions = ss->doubleExtensions + doEvenDeeperSearch;
|
ss->doubleExtensions = ss->doubleExtensions + doEvenDeeperSearch;
|
||||||
|
@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
if (!ttMove && cutNode)
|
if (!ttMove && cutNode)
|
||||||
r += 2;
|
r += 2;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
value = -search<NonPV>(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, newDepth - (r > 4), !cutNode);
|
value = -search<NonPV>(pos, ss+1, -(alpha+1), -alpha, newDepth - (r > 3), !cutNode);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// For PV nodes only, do a full PV search on the first move or after a fail
|
// For PV nodes only, do a full PV search on the first move or after a fail
|
||||||
|
@ -1320,8 +1320,8 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
// Reduce other moves if we have found at least one score improvement (~1 Elo)
|
// Reduce other moves if we have found at least one score improvement (~1 Elo)
|
||||||
if ( depth > 1
|
if ( depth > 1
|
||||||
&& beta < 12535
|
&& beta < 14001
|
||||||
&& value > -12535)
|
&& value > -12754)
|
||||||
depth -= 1;
|
depth -= 1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
assert(depth > 0);
|
assert(depth > 0);
|
||||||
|
@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
// Bonus for prior countermove that caused the fail low
|
// Bonus for prior countermove that caused the fail low
|
||||||
else if (!priorCapture && prevSq != SQ_NONE)
|
else if (!priorCapture && prevSq != SQ_NONE)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int bonus = (depth > 5) + (PvNode || cutNode) + (bestValue < alpha - 97 * depth) + ((ss-1)->moveCount > 10);
|
int bonus = (depth > 5) + (PvNode || cutNode) + (bestValue < alpha - 100 * depth) + ((ss-1)->moveCount > 11);
|
||||||
update_continuation_histories(ss-1, pos.piece_on(prevSq), prevSq, stat_bonus(depth) * bonus);
|
update_continuation_histories(ss-1, pos.piece_on(prevSq), prevSq, stat_bonus(depth) * bonus);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -1499,7 +1499,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
if (PvNode && bestValue > alpha)
|
if (PvNode && bestValue > alpha)
|
||||||
alpha = bestValue;
|
alpha = bestValue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
futilityBase = bestValue + 168;
|
futilityBase = bestValue + 190;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
const PieceToHistory* contHist[] = { (ss-1)->continuationHistory, (ss-2)->continuationHistory,
|
const PieceToHistory* contHist[] = { (ss-1)->continuationHistory, (ss-2)->continuationHistory,
|
||||||
|
@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Do not search moves with bad enough SEE values (~5 Elo)
|
// Do not search moves with bad enough SEE values (~5 Elo)
|
||||||
if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-110)))
|
if (!pos.see_ge(move, Value(-94)))
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -1705,7 +1705,7 @@ moves_loop: // When in check, search starts here
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!pos.capture_stage(bestMove))
|
if (!pos.capture_stage(bestMove))
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int bonus2 = bestValue > beta + 153 ? bonus1 // larger bonus
|
int bonus2 = bestValue > beta + 143 ? bonus1 // larger bonus
|
||||||
: stat_bonus(depth); // smaller bonus
|
: stat_bonus(depth); // smaller bonus
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Increase stats for the best move in case it was a quiet move
|
// Increase stats for the best move in case it was a quiet move
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue