Remove a lot of complex, obscure and useless code.
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +162 =673 -164 -1 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is what actually is.
A standard naming convention suggests to name a variable
with someting resembling _what_ the variable is and not
_how_ the variable is used. This normally results
in easier to read code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
A bigger "safety" value is actually a bigger
threat for the king, so it is a bigger "danger"
With this renaming "Cowardice" and "Aggressiveness"
UCI parameters become easier to understand.
It is also easier to understand why the once "safety"
value (that is a "danger") is subtracted from evaluation
instead of being added.
No functional change.
Use a Weights[] array instead of named variables to
store evaluation weights.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Because exit_threads() references the global object TM, we
need to call the function when still inside main(), otherwise,
due to undefined global object initialization and destruction
we could end up with referencing an already destroyed object.
Actually this should not happen because Application singleton
is initialized _only_ after all the other globals due to how
Application::initialize() is defined, but this is very tricky
C++ and not easy to follow, even for me ;-)
Also rearranged a bit main() code flow.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Moved evaluation of unstoppable pawns out of
evauation of passed pawns because event frequency is
much lower. Added evaluate_unstoppable_pawns() that
is called very seldom and contains all the unstoppable
pawn logic.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
The idea is to reduce the score if we have many
pawns opposing an enemy pawn so that the draw
possibility increases.
Just introduced the logic, but no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is the world's fussiest compiler with +w1
Warnings reported by Richard Lloyd.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
No change in functionality signature
The only functional change is that when we reach PLY_MAX,
we now return VALUE_DRAW instead of evaluating position.
But we reach PLY_MAX only when position is dead drawn and
transposition table is filled with draw scores, so this
shouldn't matter at all.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Game phase is a strictly function of the material
combination so its natural place is MaterialInfo,
not position.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Move the code to the caller and also move mob_area
computation out of evaluate_pieces(). It is more clear
the code flow and it is also faster.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Increases performance because now we use one integer
for both midgame and endgame scores.
Unfortunatly the latest patches seem to have reduced a bit
the speed so at the end we are more or less at the same
performance level of the beginning. But this patch series
introduced also some code cleanup so it is the main reason
we commit anyway.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Save mid and end game scores in an union so to
operate on both values in one instruction.
This patch just introduces the infrastructure and changes
EvalInfo to use a single Score value instead of mgValue
and egValue.
Speed is more or less the same because we still don't use
unified midgame-endgame tables where the single assignment
optimization can prove effective.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Don't seem to help, perhaps because we
return an approximate SEE score instead of the
real negative score so that we have some bad capture
or evasion sub-optimal ordering that compensates
the speed up.
Anyhow after 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +240 =514 -245 -2 ELO
So almost no harm to remove and make the code simpler.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This patch cuts 30% of SEE calculations, as a drawback
a returned negative value is no more always correct if
a shortcut is found.
This could impact move order when based on negative see
score as example bad captures and evasions.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Verified against tuning branch.
After 100 games at 1+0 on Joona QUAD
Mod - Orig: 527.5 - 471.5 (+20 elo)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Give a bonus for each kind of attacked piece. Bonus
value is based on the type of attacked piece and the
type of attacking one.
Penalize pieces attacked by enemy pawns, also in
this case penality value depends on the type of
attacked piece.
This patch oboletes as redundant the increased mobility
count of the attcked squares that is then removed.
After 956 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +262 =462 -232 51.57% 493.0/956 +11 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Marco's new code for evaluating two unstoppable passed pawns where
one pawn promotes a single ply before the other tried to detect
cases where the pawn that promotes first could immediately capture
the pawn that promotes a ply later, but didn't work in cases where
the two pawns are on the same file. An example of this is the
following position:
8/8/3K4/2P5/2p5/3k4/8/8 w - -
With the new code, such positions are handled correctly.
In this case we call evaluate() being in check and this
is not allowed.
Bug found testing with reduced PLY_MAX value as suggested
by Miguel A. Ballicora on talkchess.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
