This is the world's fussiest compiler with +w1
Warnings reported by Richard Lloyd.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
No change in functionality signature
The only functional change is that when we reach PLY_MAX,
we now return VALUE_DRAW instead of evaluating position.
But we reach PLY_MAX only when position is dead drawn and
transposition table is filled with draw scores, so this
shouldn't matter at all.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Game phase is a strictly function of the material
combination so its natural place is MaterialInfo,
not position.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Move the code to the caller and also move mob_area
computation out of evaluate_pieces(). It is more clear
the code flow and it is also faster.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Increases performance because now we use one integer
for both midgame and endgame scores.
Unfortunatly the latest patches seem to have reduced a bit
the speed so at the end we are more or less at the same
performance level of the beginning. But this patch series
introduced also some code cleanup so it is the main reason
we commit anyway.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Save mid and end game scores in an union so to
operate on both values in one instruction.
This patch just introduces the infrastructure and changes
EvalInfo to use a single Score value instead of mgValue
and egValue.
Speed is more or less the same because we still don't use
unified midgame-endgame tables where the single assignment
optimization can prove effective.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Don't seem to help, perhaps because we
return an approximate SEE score instead of the
real negative score so that we have some bad capture
or evasion sub-optimal ordering that compensates
the speed up.
Anyhow after 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +240 =514 -245 -2 ELO
So almost no harm to remove and make the code simpler.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This patch cuts 30% of SEE calculations, as a drawback
a returned negative value is no more always correct if
a shortcut is found.
This could impact move order when based on negative see
score as example bad captures and evasions.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Verified against tuning branch.
After 100 games at 1+0 on Joona QUAD
Mod - Orig: 527.5 - 471.5 (+20 elo)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Give a bonus for each kind of attacked piece. Bonus
value is based on the type of attacked piece and the
type of attacking one.
Penalize pieces attacked by enemy pawns, also in
this case penality value depends on the type of
attacked piece.
This patch oboletes as redundant the increased mobility
count of the attcked squares that is then removed.
After 956 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +262 =462 -232 51.57% 493.0/956 +11 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Marco's new code for evaluating two unstoppable passed pawns where
one pawn promotes a single ply before the other tried to detect
cases where the pawn that promotes first could immediately capture
the pawn that promotes a ply later, but didn't work in cases where
the two pawns are on the same file. An example of this is the
following position:
8/8/3K4/2P5/2p5/3k4/8/8 w - -
With the new code, such positions are handled correctly.
In this case we call evaluate() being in check and this
is not allowed.
Bug found testing with reduced PLY_MAX value as suggested
by Miguel A. Ballicora on talkchess.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Add a rule about the situation when one side queens exactly
one ply before the other. To avoid difficult (but luckly rare)
cases we only handle the case of free paths to queen for
both sides.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Fix a condition for x-ray attack of a queen or
a rook behind a pawn of us. Previous condition does
not check if the enemy slider behind our pawn is
really attacking the pawn.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
If an enemy piece is defended by a pawn don't give the
extra mobility bonus in case we attack it.
Joona says that "Paralyzing pawn" is usually worth of nothing.
On Joona QUAD after 964 games:
Orig - Patch_2: 191 - 218 - 555 (+ 10 elo)
On my PC after 999 games at 1+0:
Mod vs Orig +227 =550 -222 50.25% 502.0/999 +2 ELO
In both cases we tested against the original version (without
increased mobility), not against the previous patch that instead
seems to fail on Joona QUAD:
Orig vs. Prev.Patch: 237 - 217 - 627 (-6 elo)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Now in mobility we count enemy attacked pieces as
empty squares.
With this patch we try to give an higher score to positions
where the number of attacked pieces is higher.
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +262 =517 -219 52.15% 520.5/998 +15 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
They are pawn structure invariant so has a sense to
store togheter with pawn info instead of recalculating
them each time evaluate() is called.
Speed up is around 1%
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Is used only in weight_option() so inline there.
Unroll color loop also for evaluate_space() and
finally also some assorted code style fixes.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Use templates to manually unroll the loops so that
many values could be calculated at compile time or at
runtime but with a fast direct memory access instead of
an indirect one.
This change gives a speed up of 3.5 % on pgo build !!! :-)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Move to what we already do in generate_piece_moves()
This simple patch gives a spped up of 1.4% !!
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Idea from Joona.
After 999 games at 1+0 on my Intel Core 2 Duo
Orig - Mod: +215 =538 -226 (+11 ELO)
On Joona QUAD after 845 games at 1+0
Orig - Mod: 151 - 181 - 513 (+13 elo)
So it seems a good change !
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is in line with attackers_to() and is shorter and
piece is already redundant because is passed as template
parameter anyway.
Integrate also pawn_attacks_from() in the attacks_from()
family so to have an uniform attack info API.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is a bit longer but much easier to understand especially
for people new to the sources. I remember it was not trivial
for me to understand the returned attack bitboard refers to
attacks launched from the given square and not attacking the
given square.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Instead of pawn_attacks(Color c, Square s) define as
pawn_attacks(Square s, Color c) to be more aligned to
the others attack info functions.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This patch is built on Tord idea to use functions instead of
templates to access position's bitboards. This has the added advantage
that we don't need fallback functions for cases where the piece
type or the color is a variable and not a constant.
Also added Joona suggestion to workaround request for two types
of pieces like bishop_and_queens() and rook_and_queens().
No functionality or performance change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Use a single template to get bitboard representation of
the position given the type of piece as a constant.
This removes almost 80 lines of code and introduces an
uniform notation to be used for querying for piece type.
No functional change and no performance change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
