Gain value is multiplied by 16 to be of comparable magnitudo
of negative history, on average.
This patch shows very good results in tactical tests, but
started very bad in real games, so I have run two test matches.
After 896 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +187 =525 -184 +1 ELO
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +223 =590 -186 +13 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We can do this only when needed, if we get a cut-off
before we skip sorting entirely. This reduces sorting
time of about 20%.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In search routines we use information from previous ply
and init killers two plies ahead.
So for me it seems correct to copy 4 searchstack items
in split:
ply - 1, ply, ply + 1, ply + 2
Because
a) we do not split at root (ply == 0)
b) ply < PLY_MAX and SearchStack size is PLY_MAX_PLUS_2
there should be no risk of underflows or overflows
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
With negative history we don't have anymore a
lot of zeroes to score, so just split moves in
positives and non-positives sets.
Speed up is almost zero, we cannot test speed directly
because node count changed due to reorder, but I have
verified sorting is correct. With a profiler I have
seen we gain a little in sort_moves() and lose a little
in insertion_sort(), so the net effect is almost zero,
but code is simpler.
No real change, just move reordering.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It was only used to control StopOnPonderHit variable.
Now use FailLow variable instead.
Patch has a minor effect on time management when ponder is on.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
noProblemFound condition is never true.
This was verified by running 800 games 1+0 match in 1 CPU computer.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Because H.move_ordering_score() can return negative values
some negative see moves could be searched before non-negative
see moves with negative history.
This patch restores proper ordering.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Now that history can go negative and is almost alwyas
non zero we have no more reasons to use also psqt term.
After 994 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +204 =597 -193 +4 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Instead of piece-from-to, in this way it is similar
to what we already do for history.
Almost no change, but seems a bit simpler in this way.
After 995 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +207 =596 -192 +5 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems more standard conformant. Also added a bit of
description directly from Tord.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We erroneusly added two times the same scaling function
to endgame's map.
Fix detected by valgrind becasue resulted in a memleak
of the first added scaling function.
Bug introduced by 30e8f0c9ad6a473 of 13/02/2009
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We had an overflow due to use an integer for hash size,
now we use a size_t as we should, so we can increase to
an higher limit.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Normally it's up to the GUI to check for option's limits,
but we could receive the new value directly from the user
by teminal window. So let's check the bounds anyway.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
With new target 'make gcc-popcnt' it is now
possible to compile with enabled hardware POPCNT
support also with gcc. Until now was possible only
for Intel and MSVC compilers.
When this instruction is supported by CPU, for instance
on Intel i7 or i5 family, produced binary is a bit faster.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This reverts commit c43c5fe9e0.
Produces following build error after 'make clean', 'make icc' under Mandriva
with icc version 11.0
Makefile:306: .depend: No such file or directory
In file included from tt.cpp:28:
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-manbo-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include/xmmintrin.h:35:3: error: #error "SSE instruction set not enabled"
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Futility captures alone does not seem an improvment.
Perhaps is a combination of stand pat + futility that is winning,
so revert for now and continue testing starting from a standard
base until we find the correct receipe.
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +231 0506 -201 +10 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Under some rare cases we can have a search tree explosion
due to a perpetual check or to a very long non-capture TT
sequence.
This avoids the tree explosion not following TT moves that
are not captures or promotions when we are below the
'generate checks' depth.
Idea suggested by Richard Vida.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Not a biggie but is a reduced pruned patch that doesn't
seems to hurt, so it is welcomed ;-)
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +207 =601 -191 +6 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
At ply == OnePly (common case) we avoid some useless
floating point computation.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Previously input like "setoption name Use Search Log value true "
(note space at the end of the line) didn't work.
Now parse value same way as option name. This way we implicitly
left- and right-trim value.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Initializing high-level object at startup is very dangerous,
because low-level snippets are not yet initialized.
For example Position's constructor calls find_checkers() which
calls attackers_to() which depends on various global bitboard arrays
which are not yet initialized. I think we are lucky not to crash.
RootPosition.from_fen(StartPosition); is called immediately after
all initializations are made at uci_main_loop() which is the
correct behaviour
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Joona new aspiration window. Main idea is to always
research aspiration fail highs/low at the same
ply and use much smaller aspiration window than previously.
Testing result is very positive.
1CPU:
953-1149
4CPU:
545 - 656
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Avoid to take the lock two times in a tight sequence, the first
in get_next_move() and the second to update sp->moves.
Do all with one lock and so retire the now useless locked version
of get_next_move().
Also fix some theorical race due to comparison sp->bestValue < sp->beta
is done out of lock protection. Finally fix another (harmless but time
waster) race that coudl occur because thread_should_stop() is also
called outside of lock protection.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In debug run with 2 threads it happens to be following
assert after some minutes:
assert(value > -VALUE_INFINITE && value < VALUE_INFINITE);
in search(), line 1615.
I am not able to understand why, anyhow reverted for the moment.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This avoid us to forget some very needed tests now that
futility has changed in a whole big chunk we need to fine
tuning every splitted change.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This will be useful to use gains table in move
ordering along with history table.
No functional change and big code remove.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
