Here we skip the call to pos.attacks_from<ROOK>(s) in the 98%
of cases, testing the first 2 members first. Unfortunatly
code is a bit triky and not clear. So we give up to the
speed optimization in exchange of more code clarity.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
So when we are doing a LMR search at the parent ALL node.
This patch didn't prove stronger at 60" TC
LLR: -2.97 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 22398 W: 4070 L: 4060 D: 14268
But, first, it scores at 50%, second (and most important for me) the opposite,
i.e. normal reduction when parent node is not reduced, seems very bad:
LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 7036 W: 1446 L: 1534 D: 4056
According to Don, this idea of increased reduction of CUT nodes
works because if parent node is reduced, missing a cut-off due to
reduced depth search (meaning position is somehow tricky) forces
a full depth research at parent node, giving due insight in this
set of sensible positions.
IOW if we expect a node to fail-high at depth n, then we assume it
should fail-high also at depth n-1, if this doesn't happen it means
position is tricky enough to deserve a research at depth n+1.
bench: 4687419
We got a good result from this tweak, in line with
what was already found by Don Dailey.
At short TC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 13097 W: 2742 L: 2598 D: 7757
At long TC:
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 7281 W: 1408 L: 1265 D: 4608
bench: 5108393
Follow Don Dailey definition of cut/all node:
"If the previous node was a cut node, we consider this an ALL node.
The only exception is for PV nodes which are a special case of ALL nodes.
In the PVS framework, the first zero width window searched from a PV
node is by our definition a CUT node and if you have to do a re-search
then it is suddenly promoted to a PV nodes (as per PVS search) and only
then can the cut and all nodes swap positions. In other words, these
internal search failures can force the status of every node in the subtree
to swap if it propagates back to the last PV nodes."
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?topic_view=threads&p=519741&t=47577
With this definition we have an hit rate higher than 90% on:
if (!PvNode && depth > 4 * ONE_PLY)
dbg_hit_on_c(cutNode, (bestValue >= beta));
And an hit rate of just 28% on:
if (!PvNode && depth > 4 * ONE_PLY)
dbg_hit_on_c(!cutNode, (bestValue >= beta));
No functional change.
Fix was wrong becuase search starts from ss+1,
code is a bit tricky here, so rewrite in a way
to be more easy to read and understand.
Spotted by Eelco.
No functional change.
In case of we pick a sub-optimal move be
sure to print this, and not the best one
on seach log file.
Bug spotted by Guenther Demetz.
No functional change.
Search is started after setting a position and
issuing UCI 'go' command. Then if we stop the search
and call 'go' again without setting a new position it
is assumed that the previous setup is preserved, but
this is not the case because what happens is that
SetupStates is reset to NULL, leading to a crash as
soon as RootPos.is_draw() is called because st->previous
is now stale.
UCI protocol is not very clear about requiring that a
position is setup always before launching a search,
so here we easy the life of GUI developers assuming
that the current state is preserved after returning
from a 'stop' command.
Bug reported by Gregor Cramer.
No functional change.
A small number of tests with simulated
annealing at 15s indicated these values
may be better
And this is verified at long 60+0.05 TC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 40658 W: 7821 L: 7501 D: 25336
bench: 4931544
This patch is the sum of:
- Grainsize of 4 instead of 8
- Removing "depth < DEPTH_ZERO"
- Change DEPTH_QS_RECAPTURES = -5 to -7
All the patches individually failed to pass SPRT but scored
around 50%.
Together they pass easily short TC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 4429 W: 964 L: 844 D: 2621
And with some difficult long TC of 60+0.05:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 64133 W: 11968 L: 11532 D: 40633
bench: 4821467
Add MOVE_NONE at the tail, this allows to loop
across MoveList checking for *it != MOVE_NONE,
and because *it is used imediately after compiler
is able to reuse it.
With this small patch perft speed increased of 3%
And it is also a semplification !
No functional change.
Most of the time we cut-off earlier, at captures, so this
results in useless work.
There is a small functionality change becuase 'ss' can change
from MovePicker c'tor to when killers are tried due, for
instance, to singular search.
bench: 4603795
Very good at long 60"+0.05 TC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 5954 W: 1151 L: 1016 D: 3787
[edit: slightly changed form original patch to avoid useless loop
across killers when killer is MOVE_NONE]
bench: 4327405
Performed more or less well at short TC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 50517 W: 9815 L: 9574 D: 31128
And a bit better at long TC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 15564 W: 2805 L: 2624 D: 10135
bench: 4375253
It seems that do not limiting checking the
trapped rook only on rank 1 improves the
score.
At long TC
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 6581 W: 1346 L: 1204 D: 4031
bench: 4985012
Don't update refutation table in case of
previous move is MOVE_NULL or MOVE_NONE
and don't try refutation if is already
a killer move.
Pass both short TC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 4310 W: 953 L: 869 D: 2488
And long one
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 6707 W: 1254 L: 1184 D: 4269
bench: 4785954
Very good result both at short TC 15+0.05
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 2803 W: 596 L: 483 D: 1724
And at long TC 60+0.05
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94)
Total: 2862 W: 548 L: 431 D: 1883
bench: 4329221
Unortunatly we have no guarantee that the call to
operator~(Color c) is resolved at compile time.
Perhaps the solution would be to use C++11 const_expr,
but for now simply use the good old-style ternary operator
that works as expected.
No functional change.
