MSVC gives:
warning C4146: unary minus operator applied to unsigned type,
result still unsigned
When finds -b where b is an unsigned integer. So rewrite the two's
complement in a way to avoid the warning. Theoretically the new
version is slower, but in practice changes nothing.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Strangely enough it seems that optimization doesn't work.
After 760 games at 1+0: +155 -184 =421 -13 ELO
Probably the overhead, although small, for setting the flag
is not compensated by the saved evaluation call.
This could be due to the fact that after a TT value is stored,
if and when we hit the position again the stored TT value is
actually used as a cut-off so that we don't need to go on
with another search and evaluation is avoided in any case.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
If we want to store a value of type VALUE_TYPE_EVAL for
a given position and we found an already exsisting entry
for the same position then we skip.
We don't want to overwrite a more valuable score with a
lesser one. Note that also in case the exsisting entry is
of VALUE_TYPE_EVAL type the overwrite is unuseful because
we would store the same score again.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
When the stored TT value equals the static value set a
proper flag so to not call evaluation() if we hit the
same position again but use the stored TT value instead.
This is another trick to avoid calling costly evaluation()
in qsearch.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Fix a bug in the way a move is stored and read in a TT entry.
We use a mask of 19 bits insteaad of 17 so that the last
two bits in the TT entry end up to be random data.
This bug will bite us when we will use these two until now
unused bits.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After testing it seems patch is bad:
After 999 games 1+0: +242 -271 =486 -10 ELO
So restore saving of TT at the end but using new Joona
idea of storing as VALUE_TYPE_UPPER/VALUE_TYPE_LOWER instead
of VALUE_TYPE_EXACT.
Some optimization is still possible but better test new ideas
one by one.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Instead of just drop evaluation score after stand pat
logic save it in TT so to be reused if the same position
occurs again.
Note that we NEVER use the cached value apart to avoid an
evaluation call, in particulary we never return to caller
after a succesful tt hit.
To accomodate this a new value type VALUE_TYPE_EVAL has been
introduced so that ok_to_use_TT() always returns false.
With this patch we cut about 15% of total evaluation calls.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is now disabled by default due to bad results
against a pool of engines...more testing is needed tough.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is the only "correct" exact value we can store.
Otherwise there could be spurious failed high/low nodes.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Some changes to the zobrist keys, to make them identical
to those used by Glaurung 1.
The only purpose is to make it possible for both programs
to use the same opening book.
Merged from Glaurung current development snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is what prevented USE_32BIT_ATTACKS from working
on some architectures (like PowerPC).
Merged from Glaurung current development snapshot.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We implicitly considered the minimum depth stored in TT
to be Depth(0), but because we store values in TT also in
qsearch() where depth is < 0, we need to use a negative
number as minimum depth.
Bug spotted by Joona Kiiski.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
I have just made a new rule that no modification
that increases pruning is allowed if after 1000 games
ELO is not increased by at least 10 point (was +5 in this case)
Yes, I like this kind of nosense rules :-)
Previous setup didn't change anything
After 996 games 1+0: +267 -261 =468 +2 ELO
Now with this new setup we have
After 999 games 1+0: +277 -245 =477 +11 ELO
Seems reasonable...
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Reduce of two plies near the leafs and when we still
have enough depth to go so to limit horizon effects.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Try to save space and use the minimum size
possible.
In particular restore int16_t for values and int8_t
for halfOpenFiles.
Use int16_t for storm values insted of int and also
instead of original buggy and too small int8_t.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Note that some pawns and material info has been switched
to int from int8_t.
This is a waste of space but it is not clear if we have a
faster or slower code (or nothing changed), some test should be
needed.
Few warnings still are alive.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
These fields are defined as int8_t but values bigger
then 127 are stored there so that we silently overflow.
Fix bringing up all the fields to a sane int type. This
will increase memory usage, but apart from being safe, it is
not clear if code is slower or faster. Test is needed.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It does not seem to clearly improve things and
in any case is disabled by default, so retire for now.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Prune more moves after a null search because of
a lower beta limit then in main search.
In test positions reduces the searched nodes of 30% !!!!
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems that these compilers do not like inline functions
that call a template when template definition is not in scope.
So move functions from header to in *.cpp file
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Quickly filter out some calls to sliders attacks
when we already know that will fail for sure.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Rewritten hidden_checkers() to avoid calling
sliders attacks functions but just a much
faster squares_between()
Also a good code semplification.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Instead of copying all, copy only the fields that
are updated incrementally, not the ones that are
recalcuated form scratch anyway.
This reduces copy overhead of 30%.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is slower the previous uglier but faster code.
So completely restore old one for now :-(
Just leave in the rework of status backup/restore in do_move().
We will cherry pick bits of previous work once we are sure
we have fixed the performance regression.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
