Node count is different just becuase now we don't log on
"bench.txt" file anymore so that we avoid some calls to
pretty_pv() that calls Position::do_move().
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This prevent crashing on mobile devices with limited RAM,
currently with MAX_THREADS = 32 we would need 44MB that
could be too much for a poor cellphone.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This change allows to remove some quite a bit of code
and seems the natural thing to do.
Introduced file thread.cpp to move away from search.cpp a lot
of threads related stuff.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
According to Heinz's tests current setup is in fact too
strong for weak players. This seems the best according
to his tests.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Shrink search() signature for better readibility.
We get also a nice 1.3% speed increase.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems we have a lot of totally useless code !
After 8577 games 1504 - 1451 - 5622 ELO +2 (+- 4.4)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Add blunder cabability to skill level feature.
The idea is that instead of choosing the best move at the end
of the ID loop, we now do this at a randomly chosen sampling depth
dependent on SkillLevel, so that at low skill levels we sample when
ID loop has reached only a small depth and so we have an higher
probability to pick up a blunder.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
The idea is to try a shallow search with reduced beta
on bad captures so to quickly prune them out in case
are really bad.
After 5529 games 966 - 868 - 3695 ELO +6 (+- 5.4) LOS 91%
Tested also version without upper limitation to 8 plies:
After 8780 games 1537 - 1398 - 5850 ELO +5 (+- 4.3) LOS 93%
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Rescaled Skill level from 0 to 20. At level 19 is still
comparable with Crafty 20.14, while at low levels strength
increase is now less steep.
Thanks to Joona and Heinz for testing and valuable
comments.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is now possible to adjust skill level of Stockfish
from 10 (full strength) to 0.
Skill adjustment is done in such a way that is CPU speed and
time control largely independent, at least at low skills. It
means that given a skill we have same play level on a mobile
phone and on a super OCTAL CPU, at 1' per game or at 180'.
At skill 9 strength is that of an average engine, I have used
Crafty 20.14 to tune and we are more or less there. At skill 0
engine is pretty weak but still shows a realistic play.
When skill is not used we don't have any impact on the regular
code.
Idea to use MultiPV is from Heinz van Saanen, implementation and
formulas by me.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is how Shredder, Rybka and others do and
avoids user is confused by a fail high (sent to GUI)
followed by a fail low (not sent).
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Has been reported by Justin Blanchard that
this creates problems on some buggy GUI.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Fix a corner case where we start aspiration window and
suddendly we get a VALUE_KNOWN_WIN / MATE score, this makes
aspiration to blow up in a series of researches loops.
Exit aspiration loop in that case.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Use first iteration to get a proper startup score
and possibly detect an easy move.
After 5180 games:
Mod vs Orig 847 - 823 - 3510 ELO +1 (+- 5.5)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Because we are never in check there and evaluation cannot
return a mated value the condition is useless.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Now that we don't have anymore a search stack array in
SplitPoint we can rename this data member to somthing more
usual.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Use a local variable instead. To make it work we need to
correctly init next ply search stack at the beginning of the
search because now that ss is allocated on the stack instead
of on the global storage it contains garbage.
As a side effect we can peform a fast search stack
init in id_loop().
With this patch size of SplitPoint goes from 71944 to 136 bytes,
and consequently size of Thread goes from 575568 to 1104 bytes.
Finally the size of ThreadsManager that contains all the thread
info goes from 9209248 to just 17824 bytes !!
No functional change also in faked split.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
