Use a better condition to find candidate direct check pawns.
In particular consider only pawns in the front ranks of the
enemy king, this greatly reduces pawns candidates bitboard
that now is empty more then 90% of the time so that we
can early skip further tests.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Be more strict, is not enough dc bitboard is not empty, but
needs to inclde also at least one pawn.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We can parametrize for the capture direction too.
Also use a single template parameter and calculate (at
compile time) remainin parameters directly in the function.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Centralize in a single object all the global resources
management and avoid a bunch of sparse exit() calls.
This is more reliable and clean and more stick to C++ coding
practices.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Move closing of file in Book destructor. This
guarantees us against leaving the file open under
any case and simplifies also Book use.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Let Book be derived directly from std::ifstream
and rewrite the functions accordingly.
Also simplify file reading by use of operator>>()
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In case we have a correct white pawn move but pawn
is black (or the contrary) we fail to detect the
move as illegal.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Use pieces_of_type() instead of pieces_of_color_and_type()
in an hot loop and cut of almost 10% SEE execution time.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Instead of a position because the key is all that we
need.
Interface is more clear and also very very little bit faster.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It breaks also Glaurung 2 book parsing.
We really need to work on book.cpp, but for now just
leave compatibility just for Glaurung 2 books.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We currently fail on an option with a sapece in the name,
as example
setoption name Clear Hash
returns error message "Option Clear not found". This
patch fixes this off-by-one type bug.
Thanks to Joona for spotting this.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Instead of a delayed selection sort so that the highest
score move is picked up from the list when needed, sort all
the moves up front just after score them.
Selection sort is O(n*n) while std::sort is O(n*log n), it
is true that delayed selection allows us to just pick the move
until a cut off occurs or up to a given limit (12), but with
an average of 30 non capture-moves delayed pick become slower
just after 5-6 moves and we now pick up to 12.
Profiling seem to prove this idea and movepick.cpp is now 10%
faster.
Also tests seem to confirm this:
After 700 games at 1+0: Mod vs Orig +178 -160 =362 +9 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We don't want to return unproven null move fails high, so
that if a position is so good that null move fails high we
want to check this with real do_move() / undo_move() test,
not just razoring the position because, from the opponent
point of view, is very bad.
These are tests results at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +252 -264 =483 49.40%
Mod vs Toga II 1.4.1SE +365 -325 =309 52.00%
So it seems a very slightly regression regarding orig version (but
withing error bar) and a nice increase against Toga that is what we
are interested most. Orig version scores 49.75% against Toga, so
we welcome this change ;-)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is bogusly assigned from moves[i].move instead of mlist[i].move
or equivalently to moves[count].move that it seem more clear to me.
Bug is hidden while all the moves are included, in this default case
moves[i].move and mlist[i].move are the same variable.
Also a bit of cleanup while there.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After proof testing on 3 different engines these
are the results:
Stockfish - Toga II 1.4.1SE +130 -132 =132 49.75%
Stockfish - Deep Sieng 3.0 +145 -110 =150 54.45%
Stockfish - HIARCS 12 MP +94 -149 =150 43.00%
So it seems no regressions occurs, although also no
improvment. But anyhow this patch increases Stockfish
strenght against itself, so merge it.
Note that this patch not only adds back razoring at depth
one, but also increases razor depth limit from 3 to 4
because hard coded depth 4 limit is no more overwritten
by UCI parameter that otherwise defaults to 3.
Because futility margins array has a fixed size we cannot
arbitrarly choose or change the SelectiveDepth parameter,
otherwise we have a crash for values bigger then array size.
On the other hand tweaking of this parameter requires some
modification to the hardcoded margins, so makes sense to hard
code also this very bounded one.
Who wants to experiment is of course free to change the sources.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is a very hot path function, profiling on Intel compiler
shows that inlining cuts in half the overhead.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Move the only function gettimeofday in misc.cpp
where is used.
This avoids polluting the global namespace.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Max hash size is 4096 MB, not 1024 MB, see the corresponding
"Hash" UCI parameter in ucioption.cpp
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Currently futility is allowed when depth < SelectiveDepth
and SelectiveDepth is 7*OnePly, so the comprison is
always true.
Patch could introduce a functional change only if
we choose to increase SelectiveDepth.
Currently no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
When testing at 1'+0" time control results are still
reasonably good. We have made two sessions on two
different PC.
After 840 games Mod - Orig: +221 -194 =425 +10 ELO (two CPU)
After 935 games Mod - Orig: +246 -222 =467 +9 ELO (single CPU)
So it seems that with fast CPU and/or longer time controls
benefits of the patch are a bit reduced. This could be due
to the fact that only 3% of nodes are pruned by razoring at
depth one and these nodes are very swallow ones, mostly get
pruned anyway with only a slightly additional cost, even
without performing any do_move() call.
Another reason is that sometime (0,3%% of cases) a possible
good move is missed typically in positions when moving side
gives check, as example in the following one
3r2k1/pbpp1nbp/1p6/3P3q/6RP/1P4P1/P4Pb1/3Q2K1 w - -
The winning move Rxg7+ is missed.
Bottom line is that patch seems good for blitz times, perhaps
also for longer times. We should test against a third engine
(Toga ?) to have a final answer regarding this new setup.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Some time ago it was found by Marco Costalba that it's better
to disable razoring at depth one, because given the very low
evaluation of the node, futility pruning would already do
the job at very low cost and avoiding missing important moves.
Now enable razoring there again, but only when our quickly evaluated
material advantage is more than a rook. The idea is to try razoring
only when it's extremely likely that it will succeed.
Extreme lightning speed test show promising result:
Orig - Mod: +1285 =1495 -1348
This needs to be tested with longer time controls though.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Restructure RazorMargins and FutilityMargins arrays so that their
values can be more easily tuned.
Add RazorApprMargins array which replaces razorAtDepthOne concept,
because setting RazorApprMargin very high value at ply one is
same as not razoring there at all.
Comment out setting razoring and futility margins through uci to
avoid errors while tuning.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
If a variable will be populated reading an UCI option
then do not hard code its default values.
This avoids misleadings when reading the sources.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Instead of loop across all legal moves to find a mate
loop across possible check moves only.
This reduces more then 10 times the number of moves to
check for a possible mate.
Also rename generate_checks() in generate_non_capture_checks()
so to better clarify what the function does.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Avoid calculating piece attacks if there aren't
available check sqaures for the given piece.
About 15% of cases. Not a biggie but still something
especially in the middle game where king is well covered
inside his castle.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
