Clang 3.5 issues warning on constructs like: abs(f1 - f2). The thing is that
f1 and f2 are enum types, and the range given (all positive) allows the
compiler to choose an unsigned type (efficiency being one reason to prefer
unsigned arithmetic). If f1 < f2 are unsigned, then f1 - f2 wraps around zero
and the abs() becomes a no-op. It's the reinterpretation of the unsigned
result (large value) as a signed int that happens to give the correct result,
thanks to 2's complement. This is all tricky and dangerous!
In the spirit of the standard, we assume nothing on the signedness of enums,
and simply calculate the rank and file distances as:
- rank_dist(r1, r2) = r1 < r2 ? r2 - r1 : r1 - r2
- file_dist(f1, f2) = f1 < f2 ? f2 - f1 : f1 - f2
this logic can in fact be applied to any enum we may use, so for better
generality and to avoid code duplication, we use a template function diff()
here.
No functional change.
Resolves#95
Where they better belong.
Also, this removes '#include <string>' from types.h, which reduces the amount of code to compile (every
translation unit includes types.h).
No functional change.
Retire software pext and introduce hardware
call when USE_PEXT is defined during compilation.
This is a full complete implementation of sliding
attacks using PEXT.
No functional change.
We avoid to use an ad-hoc table at the cost of a
relative_rank() call in advanced_pawn_push().
On my 32 bit system it is even slightly faster (on 64bit
may be different). This is the speed in nps alternating
old and new bench runs:
new
368890
368825
369972
old
367798
367635
368026
No functional change.
Instead of a passed pawn now we just require the pawn to
be in the opponent camp to be considered a dangerous
move. Added some renaming to reflect the change.
Passed both short TC test
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-1.50,4.50]
Total: 10358 W: 2033 L: 1900 D: 6425
And long TC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,6.00]
Total: 21459 W: 3486 L: 3286 D: 14687
bench: 8322172
To align to same named Position function and
avoid using std::cout directly.
Also remove some stale <iostream> include while
there.
No functional change.
Previously some squares could be "incorrectly" awarded
to a pinned piece.
e.g. in 3k4/1q6/3b4/3Q4/8/5K2/B7/8 b - - 0 1 the black
bishop get 4 squares too many and the white queen gets 6.
Passed both short TC.
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [-1.50,4.50]
Total: 4871 W: 934 L: 817 D: 3120
And long TC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,6.00]
Total: 38968 W: 6113 L: 5837 D: 27018
bench: 9282549
And #ifdef instead of #if defined
This is more standard form (see for example iostream file).
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Another trick, along the same lines of previous
patch. This time we first check positions with
white side to move that, becuase we start with
pawn on rank 7, are easily classified as wins,
then black ones.
Number of cycles reduced to 15 !
Becuase now it is faster we can remove a lot of
code to detect theoretical draws. We will calculate
them anyhow, although a bit slower, but the speed
up trick more than compensates it.
Verified that generated bitbases match original ones.
No functional change.
On Intel, perhaps due to 'lea' instruction this way of
zeroing the lsb of *b seems faster than a shift+negate.
On perft (where any speed difference is magnified) I
got a 6% speed up on my Intel i5 64bit.
Suggested by Hongzhi Cheng.
No functional change.
Implement lsb/msb using armv7 assembly instructions.
msb is the easiest one, using a gcc intrinsic that generates
code using the ARM's clz instruction. lsb is also using this
clz instruction, but with the help of ARM's 'rbit' (bit
reversing) instruction. This leads to a >2% speed gain.
I also renamed 'arm-32' to the more meaningfull 'armv7' in the Makefile
No functional change.
It seems more accurate: lsb is clear while 'first
bit' depends from where you look at the bitboard.
And fix compile in case of 64 bits platforms that
do not use BSFQ intrinsics.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is more correct given what the function does. In
particular single_bit() returns true also in case of
empty bitboards.
Of course also the usual renaming while there :-)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Renamed stuff and added comments. The aim is to make more
readable, at least by me ;-) , this newly added part of code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
