Currently, in case of fail high/low we research with
a window increased by 2*AspirationDelta at first
attempt, this patch instead makes the research be
done with an increase of just AspirationDelta size,
in case of a consecutive fail we will widen to
2*AspirationDelta and so on.
After Joona's test:
Orig - Mod: 850 - 890
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
One for failing highs and one for failing lows, this
should reduce average window size in case of positions
that fail first high and then low (or the contrary).
After ~2000 games on Joona's quad we have:
Mod - Orig: 1012- 975 (+6 elo)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Instead to leave uninitialized or scattered in the code
as is the case for ExtraSearchTime.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Currently we use original sorting after a fail low to
research at wider window. This patch instead sorts the
moves according to the last available move's scores.
Strangely no functional change, but should be.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Changed FutilityMarginsMatrix dimensions to be a power of two
so that compiler can produce a faster accessing code.
Introduced print_pv_info() to remove some redundant code in
root_search()
Remaining stuff is triviality and documentation tweaks.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Under Windows we use CreateThread() to setup threads and
we pass a pointer to a variable that receives the thread
identifier, but this parameter is optional and we don't
use it, so remove it.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It happens that NULL is 0, but the conventional meaning is of
a zero pointer, so repleace with an explicit 0 integer value.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Consider sligtly negative captures as good if at low
depth and far from beta.
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +169 =694 -136 +11 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It raises an assert under Windows, it is not clear why but it
happens that idle_loop() is called with incorrect threadID and
the assert triggered is:
assert(threadID >= 0 && threadID < MAX_THREADS);
So revert the patch for now, but we should understand why it
fails.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We can't do it with full guarantee anyway because
there is always a possible race between the setting of
state to THREAD_SLEEPING and actual sleeping.
So just remove the not perfect code to avoid misunderstandings.
This reflects what we have done in wake_sleeping_threads() in
the previous patch.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Currently there is no guarantee that threads are sleeping
when calling wake_sleeping_threads() because put_threads_to_sleep()
returns without waiting for threads to actually sleep.
Assert can be easily triggered calling put_threads_to_sleep() and
wake_sleeping_threads() in a tight loop.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This option likely has very low meaning for playing strength and style,
so I see no need to keep this configurable
No functional change
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
search() is used as a "leading star" and other routines
are modified according to it.
No functional change
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Was broken and fixing would be too messy.
Now this option is only activated in single thread mode
No functional change
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Just to avoid misunderstandings.
True staticValue is available through search stack
No functional change
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Bug spotted by Jouni Uski and fix suggested by Pablo Vazquez
Also add note that we are not always handling fifty move rule correctly
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
I cannot see connection between the two.
Also add one FIXME for illogical behaviour
No functional change
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
I don't know if enumerating sections is a good idea,
but for me code is more readable this way
No functional change
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
I cannot see any reason to do this. Even this is not enough to fix
theoretical race case on Windows which doesn't seem to cause any
problems in practice anyhow
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Resurrect extra check for sleeping in POSIX code.
This necessary to prevent ugly races between
thread_broadcast and thread_cond_wait.
After thread has woken up, it marks itself as available.
Another thread must not do this, because of possible race.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
So we can use a const value instead of a pointer in
split().
Also pass NULL instead of a faked address of alpha in
case split is called from a non-PV node.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
