Instead of piece-from-to, in this way it is similar
to what we already do for history.
Almost no change, but seems a bit simpler in this way.
After 995 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +207 =596 -192 +5 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems more standard conformant. Also added a bit of
description directly from Tord.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We erroneusly added two times the same scaling function
to endgame's map.
Fix detected by valgrind becasue resulted in a memleak
of the first added scaling function.
Bug introduced by 30e8f0c9ad6a473 of 13/02/2009
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We had an overflow due to use an integer for hash size,
now we use a size_t as we should, so we can increase to
an higher limit.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Normally it's up to the GUI to check for option's limits,
but we could receive the new value directly from the user
by teminal window. So let's check the bounds anyway.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
With new target 'make gcc-popcnt' it is now
possible to compile with enabled hardware POPCNT
support also with gcc. Until now was possible only
for Intel and MSVC compilers.
When this instruction is supported by CPU, for instance
on Intel i7 or i5 family, produced binary is a bit faster.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This reverts commit c43c5fe9e0.
Produces following build error after 'make clean', 'make icc' under Mandriva
with icc version 11.0
Makefile:306: .depend: No such file or directory
In file included from tt.cpp:28:
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-manbo-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include/xmmintrin.h:35:3: error: #error "SSE instruction set not enabled"
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Futility captures alone does not seem an improvment.
Perhaps is a combination of stand pat + futility that is winning,
so revert for now and continue testing starting from a standard
base until we find the correct receipe.
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +231 0506 -201 +10 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Under some rare cases we can have a search tree explosion
due to a perpetual check or to a very long non-capture TT
sequence.
This avoids the tree explosion not following TT moves that
are not captures or promotions when we are below the
'generate checks' depth.
Idea suggested by Richard Vida.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Not a biggie but is a reduced pruned patch that doesn't
seems to hurt, so it is welcomed ;-)
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +207 =601 -191 +6 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
At ply == OnePly (common case) we avoid some useless
floating point computation.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Previously input like "setoption name Use Search Log value true "
(note space at the end of the line) didn't work.
Now parse value same way as option name. This way we implicitly
left- and right-trim value.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Initializing high-level object at startup is very dangerous,
because low-level snippets are not yet initialized.
For example Position's constructor calls find_checkers() which
calls attackers_to() which depends on various global bitboard arrays
which are not yet initialized. I think we are lucky not to crash.
RootPosition.from_fen(StartPosition); is called immediately after
all initializations are made at uci_main_loop() which is the
correct behaviour
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Joona new aspiration window. Main idea is to always
research aspiration fail highs/low at the same
ply and use much smaller aspiration window than previously.
Testing result is very positive.
1CPU:
953-1149
4CPU:
545 - 656
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Avoid to take the lock two times in a tight sequence, the first
in get_next_move() and the second to update sp->moves.
Do all with one lock and so retire the now useless locked version
of get_next_move().
Also fix some theorical race due to comparison sp->bestValue < sp->beta
is done out of lock protection. Finally fix another (harmless but time
waster) race that coudl occur because thread_should_stop() is also
called outside of lock protection.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In debug run with 2 threads it happens to be following
assert after some minutes:
assert(value > -VALUE_INFINITE && value < VALUE_INFINITE);
in search(), line 1615.
I am not able to understand why, anyhow reverted for the moment.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This avoid us to forget some very needed tests now that
futility has changed in a whole big chunk we need to fine
tuning every splitted change.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This will be useful to use gains table in move
ordering along with history table.
No functional change and big code remove.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
With current search control system, I can see absolutely no
reason to classify fixed time search as infinite search.
So remove old dated hack
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Value of uip.eof() should not be trusted.
input like "go infinite searchmoves " (note space in the end of line)
causes problems.
Check the return value of (uip >> token) instead
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In less then 1% of cases value > sp->bestValue, so avoid
an useless lock in the common case. This is the same change
already applied to sp_search().
Also SplitPoint futilityValue is not volatile because
never changes after has been assigned in split()
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
When we have more then 2 threads then we do an array
access with index 'Threads[slave].activeSplitPoints - 1'
This should be >= 0 because we tested the variable just
few statements before, but because is a shared variable
it could be that the 'slave' thread set the value to zero
just after we test it, so that when we use the decremented
variable for array access we crash.
Bug spotted by Bruno Causse.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Unify start loop for master and slave threads. Also guarantee
that all the 'stop' flags are set to false before first slave
is started, should be no harm because only master thread can
reset 'stop' flag of slaves to true, so should be no race but
better safe then sorry.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Only pure blocking evasions are candidate
for pruning.
After 998 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +215 =596 -187 +10 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In move_to_san() we create by copy a new position just
to detect if move gives check. This could be very costly in
line_to_san() that calls move_to_san() for every move, so
create the position only once and pass a reference to move_to_san()
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
When pondering threads are put to sleep, but when thinking
the threads are parked in idle_loop in a tight polling loop
checking for workIsWaiting falg.
So before we set the slave's flag workIsWaiting we have to
guarantee that all the slave data is already setup because
slave can start in any moment from there.
Rearrange the last loop to fix this race.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
