This reverts commit a24da071f0
Seems a regression when tested against 2.3.1
With this patch, have after 20000 games at 60+0.05, we have
ELO: 13.42 +-4.8 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 20000 W: 3746 L: 2974 D: 13280
Instead with the patch reverted:
ELO: 16.62 +-4.8 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 20000 W: 3816 L: 2860 D: 13324
Although we are within error bounds here we take the conservative
approach of not introducing changes that are not proved stronger
It doesn't mean that the change shall be weaker, simply that we
don't want to take any risk.
No functional change.
Here the rational seems to be that if after one try easy
move detection fails then the easy move is not so easy :-)
After 15563 games at 60+0.05
ELO: 3.04 +-5.5 (95%) LOS: 97.0%
Total: 15563 W: 2664 L: 2528 D: 10371
No functional change.
Increase MaxRatio to use more time when in trouble.
After 16000 games at 60+0.05
ELO: 4.89 +-5.4 (95%) LOS: 99.9%
Total: 16000 W: 2700 L: 2475 D: 10825
No functional change.
This seems good at short TC controls.
After 10000 games at 20+0.05
ELO: 9.56 +-6.8 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 10000 W: 1949 L: 1674 D: 6377
Testing at long TC and regression testing is still
ongoing. So this is a bit speculative commit and
could be reverted in the future.
Also re-testing at long TC the SEE pruning in PV nodes
seems less effective (perhaps even a regression, but
still ongoing) so disabled for now.
bench: 4968764
This reverts commit 0d68b523a3.
After easy move semplification this machinery is not
needed anymore (because of we don't need to know if a
root move is a recapture)
No functional change.
Detect a move as easy only if it is the only one ;-)
or if is much better than remaining ones after we
have spent 20% of search time.
Tests are ongoing, but it seems this semplification
stands. Anyhow it is experimental for now and could
be reverted/improved with further work Gary is
testing right now.
No functional change.
After previous patch if split point master is
waiting for job and "Use Sleeping Threads" is
false (our condition for official releases) then
it will lock/unlock splitPoint mutex in a super
tight loop badly affecting performance.
Rewrite the code to lock only when we are about
to finish. Note that race condition on slavesMask
is anyhow fixed.
No functional change.
There is no point searching a move that is forced.
It wastes time while allowing computer opponents to
fill hash with 100% accuracy.
[edit: Condition moved together with "easy move" ones]
Bench identical: 4922272
We detect an easy move as a recapture with an
high margin on the second best move.
Unfortunatly the recapture detection is broken
becuase we identify as a recapture any move that
follows an opponent's previous capture !
This patch fix the logic to correctly detect a
real re-capture.
No functional change.
Note that we read shared data without lock
protection, so code is theoretically prone to
torn reads. But, first splitPoint pointer
never changes, and alpha is of integer type so
it is read in a single DWORD access.
No functional change.
This patch is actually the sum of two contributions that
have been tested independently:
1) Pruning of negative SEE moves in PV
After 10000 games at 20+0.05
ELO: 5.18 +-7 (95%) LOS: 99.2%
Total: 10000 W: 1952 L: 1803 D: 6245
2) Remove of bestValue > VALUE_MATED_IN_MAX_PLY condition
After 23000 games at 20+0.05
ELO: 1.63 +-4 (95%) LOS: 88.1%
Total: 23000 W: 4232 L: 4124 D: 14644
The whole patch as been re-tested at long TC with positive results:
After 10000 games at 60+0.05
ELO: 4.31 +-7 (95%) LOS: 98.3%
Total: 10000 W: 1765 L: 1641 D: 6594
kf = (kf == FILE_A) ? kf++ : ....
is tricky becuase kf is updated twice and it happens
to do the right thing just by accident.
Rewrite in a better way.
Spotted by pdimov
No functional change.
Give a bonus if a bishop can pin a piece or can
give a discovered check through an x-ray attack.
Seems good after 24000 games at 15"+0.05 (single thread):
ELO: 12.30 +- 99%: 5.79 95%: 4.40 LOS: 100.00%
Total: 24000 W: 4931 L: 4082 D: 14987
bench: 4917064
Rename startPosPly to gamePly and increment/decrement
the variable after each do/undo move. This adds a little
overhead in do_move() but we will need to have the
game ply during the search for the next patches now
under test.
Currently we don't increment gamePly in do_null_move()
becuase it is not needed at the moment. Could change
in the future.
As a nice side effect we can now remove an hack in
startpos_ply_counter().
No functional change.
Another trick, along the same lines of previous
patch. This time we first check positions with
white side to move that, becuase we start with
pawn on rank 7, are easily classified as wins,
then black ones.
Number of cycles reduced to 15 !
Becuase now it is faster we can remove a lot of
code to detect theoretical draws. We will calculate
them anyhow, although a bit slower, but the speed
up trick more than compensates it.
Verified that generated bitbases match original ones.
No functional change.
Change the way the index is coded so that
now looping from 0 to IndexMax generates
the pawns from RANK_7 down to RANK2.
Becuase positions with pawns at RANK_7
are easily classified as wins/draws, this
small trick allows to reduce the number
of needed iterations from 30 down to 26!
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Rename to insertion_sort so to avoid confusion
with std::sort, also move it to movepicker.cpp
and use the bit slower std::stable_sort in
search.cpp where it is used in not performance
critical paths.
No functional change.
We can encode the ClusterSize directly in the
hashMask, this allows to skip the left shift.
There is no real change, but bench number is now
different because instead of using the lowest order
bits of the key to index the start of the cluster,
now we don't use the last two lsb bits that are
always set to zero (cluster size is 4). So for
instance, if 10 bits are used to index the cluster,
instead of bits [9..0] now we use bits [11..2].
This changes the positions that end up in the same
cluster affecting TT hits and so bench is different.
Also some renaming while there.
bench: 5383795
Do a 32bit bitwise 'and' instead of a 64bit
subtract and bitwise 'and'.
This is possible because even in the biggest
hash table case (8GB) the number of entries
is 2^29 so storable in an unsigned int.
No functional change.
