There were two asserts.
The first was raised because is_ok() was called at the
beginning of do_castle_move() and this is wrong after
the last code reformatting because at that point the state
is already modified by the caller do_move().
The second, raised by debugIncrementalEval, was due to a
rounding error in compute_value() that occurs because
TempoValueEndgame was updated in an odd number by patch
"Merge Joona Kiiski evaluation tweaks" (3ed603cd) of 13/3/2009
This line in compute_value() is the guilty one:
result += (side_to_move() == WHITE)? TempoValue / 2 : -TempoValue / 2;
The fix is to increment TempoValueEndgame so to be even.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This patch seems bigger then what actually is.
It just moves some code around and adds a bit of coding style fixes
to do_move() and undo_move() so to have uniformity of naming in both
functions.
The diffstat for the whole patch series is
239 insertions(+), 426 deletions(-)
And final MSVC pgo build is even a bit faster:
Before 448.051 nodes/sec
After 453.810 nodes/sec (+1.3%)
No functional change (tested on more then 100M of nodes)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Integrate undo_ep_move in undo_move() this reduces line count
and code readibility.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Integrate do_ep_move in undo_move() this reduces line count
and code readibility.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Integrate do_promotion_move() in do_move() this reduces line count
and code readibility.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Integrate do_ep_move in do_move() this reduces line count
and code readibility.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In Movepicker c'tor we access during initialization one of
MainSearchPhaseIndex..QsearchWithoutChecksPhaseIndex globals.
Postpone definition of PhaseTable[] just after them so that
when PhaseTable[] will be accessed later in get_next_move()
it will be already present in L1/L2.
It works like an implicit prefetching of PhaseTable[].
Also shrink PhaseTable[] to fit an L1 cache line of 16 bytes
using uint8_t instead of int.
This apparentely innocuous patch gives an astonish speed
up of 1.6% under MSVC 2010 beta, pgo optimized !
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It was due to a missing -msse compiler option !
Without this option the CPU silently discards
prefetcht2 instructions during execution.
Also added a (gcc documented) hack to prevent Intel
compiler to optimize away the prefetches.
Special thanks to Heinz for testing and suggesting
improvments. And for Jim for testing icc on Windows.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
But this time with the guarantee of an always aligned
access so that prefetching is not adversely impacted.
On Joona PC
1+0, 64Mb hash:
Orig - Mod: 174 - 237 - 359
Instead after 1000 games at 1+0 with 128MB hash size
we are at + 1 ELO (just 4 games of difference).
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After fixing the cpu frequency with RightMark tool I was
able to test speed all the different prefetch combinations.
Here the results:
OS Windows Vista 32bit, MSVC compile
CPU Intecl Core 2 Duo T5220 1.55 GHz
bench on depth 12, 1 thread, 26552844 nodes searched
results in nodes/sec
no-prefetch
402486, 402005, 402767, 401439, 403060
single prefetch (aligned 64)
410145, 409159, 408078, 410443, 409652
double prefetch (aligned 64) 0+32
414739, 411238, 413937, 414641, 413834
double prefetch (aligned 64) 0+64
413537, 414337, 413537, 414842, 414240
And now also some crazy stuff:
single prefetch (aligned 128)
410145, 407395, 406230, 410050, 409949
double prefetch (aligned 64) 0+0
409753, 410044, 409456
single prefetch (aligned 64) +32
408379, 408272, 406809
single prefetch (aligned 64) +64
408279, 409059, 407395
So it seems the best is a double prefetch at the addres + 32 or +64,
I will choose the second one because it seems more natural to me.
It is still a mystery why it doesn't work under Linux :-(
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Prefetch always form a chache line boundary. It seems
that if prefetch address is not cache line aligned then
performance is adversely impacted.
Hopefully we will resuse that 32 bits of padding for something
useful in the future.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This fix a compile error under Linux with gcc when
there aren't the intel dev libraries.
Also simplify the previous patch moving TT definition
from search.cpp to tt.cpp so to avoid using passing a
pointer to TT to the current position.
Finally simplify do_move(), now we miss a prefetch in the
rare case of setting an en-passant square but code is
much cleaner and performance penalty is almost zero.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Move prefetching code inside do_move() so to allow a
very early prefetching and to put as many instructions
as possible between prefetching and following retrieve().
With this patch retrieve() times are cutted of another 25%
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
TT.retrieve() is the most time consuming function
because almost always involves a very slow RAM access.
TT table is so big that is never cached. This patch
prefetches TT data just after a move is done, so that
subsequent TT.retrieve will be very fast.
Profiling with VTune shows that TT:retrieve() times are
almost cutted in half !
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Shrink key to 32 bits instead of 64. To still avoid
collisions use the high 32 bits of position key as the
TT key and the low 32 bits to retrieve the correct
cluster index in the table.
With this patch size og TTentry shrinks to 96 bits instead
of 128 and the cluster of 4 TTEntry sums to 48 bytes instead
of 64.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Binaries are always built with symbol table in to easy
debugging and profiling.
It is now possible to run:
make strip
To remove symbol table from the compiled binary. This
could be useful to prepare the release version.
Patch by Heinz van Saanen.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Current formula enable LMR when
i + MultiPV >= LMRPVMoves
It means that, for instance, if MultiPV == 1 then LMR
will be started to be considered at move i = LMRPVMoves - 1,
while if MultiPV == 3 then it will start before,
at move i = LMRPVMoves - 3.
With this patch the formula becomes
i >= MultiPV + LMRPVMoves - 2
So that LMR will always start after LMRPVMoves - 1 moves
from the last PV move.
No functional change when MultiPV == 1
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Access pos.piece_count() only once and avoid some
branches in the inner loop.
Profiling with VTune shows a 20% speed improvement in
get_material_info(), and it is also a bit more cleaned
up this way ;-)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
And put it in an already existing one so to
optimze a bit.
Also additional cleanups and code shuffles
all around the place.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
And build also symbol table. It can easily stripped
after .exe is done and it is necessary for profiling.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After Joona's direct testing with ~2000 games it seems
values after 100.000 games does not give any advantage,
so revert for now.
Score of Stockfish_0 vs Stockfish_15: 491 - 392 - 1102
Score of Stockfish_0 vs Stockfish_40: 461 - 439 - 1076
Score of Stockfish_0 vs Stockfish_65: 442 - 518 - 1018 (13 elo)
Score of Stockfish_0 vs Stockfish_100: 504 - 502 - 984
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Currently minimum split depth is set automatically to 6
when number of CPUs is more than 4. I believe this is a bad
idea since for example my quad (4CPU with hyperthreading) is
detected as 8CPU computer. I've manually lowered down the number
of Threads, but so far I have played all games with Minimum
Split Depth set to 6!
Since 4CPU computers with hyperthreading are quite common and
8 CPU computers extremely rear (I expect we can get a direct
jump to 16 or 32 cores), this automatic adjusting is likely
to do more harm than good. Add a note in Readme.txt, so that
those rear 8CPU owners can manually tweak the "Minimum Split
Depth" parameter
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
previous used move_is_legal to verify that the move from the TT
was legal, and the old version of move_is_legal only works when
the side to move is not in check. Fixed this by adding a separate,
slower version of move_is_legal which works even when the side to
move is in check.
down the transposition table.
When the search was stopped before a fail high at the root was
resolved, Stockfish would often print a very short PV, sometimes
consisting of just a single move. This was not only a little
user-unfriendly, but also harmed the strength a little in
ponder-on games: Single-move PVs mean that there is no ponder
move to search.
It is perhaps worth considering to remove the pv[][] array
entirely, and always build the entire PV from the transposition
table. This would simplify the source code somewhat and probably
make the program infinitesimally faster, at the expense of
sometimes getting shorter PVs or PVs with rubbish moves near
the end.
Added the UCI_LimitStrength and the UCI_Elo options, with an Elo
range of 2100-2900. When UCI_LimitStrength is enabled, the number
of threads is set to 1, and the search speed is slowed down according
to the chosen Elo level.
Todo:
1. Implement Elo levels below 2100 by blundering on purpose and/or
crippling the evaluation.
2. Automatically calibrate the maximum Elo by measuring the CPU speed
during program initialization, perhaps by doing some bitboard
computations and measuring the time taken.
No functional change when UCI_LimitStrength is false (the default).
It is like a never finished painting. Everyday a little touch
more.
But this time it is very little ;-)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Small micro-optimization in this very
time critical function.
Use bitwise 'or' instead of logic 'or' to avoid branches
in the assembly and use the result to skip an handful of checks.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Verified it is equivalent to the tuning branch results
with parameter values sampled after 100.000 games.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Some unwanted changes to Makefile slept in in patch
"Introduced the UCI_AnalyseMode option".
Revert them. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is more similar to how get_material_info() and
get_pawn_info() work and also removes some clutter from
evaluate_king().
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
When ordering moves we push all captures with negative SEE values
to badCaptures[] array during the scoring phase.
This patch delays the costly SEE call up to when the move has been
picked up in pick_move_from_list(), this way we save some SEE calls
in case we get a cutoff.
It seems we have a speed gain of about 1-1.5 % in terms of nodes/sec
and profiling seems to confirm the small but real speed increase.
Idea from Pablo Vazquez on talkchess.com
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=29018&start=20
It would be a no functional change but actually it is not because
now sorting set is different and so std::sort(), that is not a
stable sort, does not guarantees the order of same scored moves to
remain the same as before.
After 952 games at 1+0 we are below error bar, almost equal just
6 games of difference (+2 ELO)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Do not call count_1s_max_15() if not necessary, as is
not in the common case (>95%).
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
