I've gone through the RENAME/REFORMATTING thread and changed everything I could find, plus a few more. With this, let's close the previous issue and open another.
No functional change.
Preparation commit for the upcoming Stockfish 10 version, giving a chance to catch last minute feature bugs and evaluation regression during the one-week code freeze period. Also changing the copyright dates to include 2019.
No functional change
This eliminates alignment padding and reduces size from 48 to 40 bytes.
This makes the material HashTable smaller and more cache friendly.
No functional change
Closes#1013
Import C++11 branch from:
https://github.com/mcostalba/Stockfish/tree/c++11
The version imported is teh last one as of today:
6670e93e50
Branch is fully equivalent with master but syzygy
tablebases that are missing (but will be added with
next commit).
bench: 8080602
It is up to material (and pawn) table look up
code to know where the per-thread tables are,
so change API to reflect this.
Also some comment fixing while there
No functional change.
Move all in evaluation.
Simplify the code and concentrate in a single place
all the logic behind space evaluation, making it much
more clear.
Verified also at STC it does not regress due to a possible
slow down:
LLR: 3.91 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 65744 W: 13285 L: 13194 D: 39265
No functional change.
And #ifdef instead of #if defined
This is more standard form (see for example iostream file).
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Allows some code semplification and avoids directly
allocation and managing heap memory.
Also the usual renaming while there.
No functional change and no speed regression.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Associate platform OS thread to the Thread class instead of
creating it from ThreadsManager.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Follow the suggested Qt style:
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/qq/qq13-apis.html
It seems to me simpler and easier to read.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is more idiomatic for a functor (a function object) as are
the endgames.
Suggested by Rein Halbersma.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This change allows to remove some quite a bit of code
and seems the natural thing to do.
Introduced file thread.cpp to move away from search.cpp a lot
of threads related stuff.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Now that we prefetch in material hash table we
can increase its size and gain something.
Hit rate is now of 98% from 92%
Speedup of 0.8%
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Plus some other icc warnings popped up with new and strictier
compile options.
No functional and speed change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Plus a bunch of other minor optimizations.
With this power pack we have an increase
of a whopping 1.4% :-)
...and it took 3 good hours of profiling + hacking to get it out !
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Game phase is a strictly function of the material
combination so its natural place is MaterialInfo,
not position.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Increases performance because now we use one integer
for both midgame and endgame scores.
Unfortunatly the latest patches seem to have reduced a bit
the speed so at the end we are more or less at the same
performance level of the beginning. But this patch series
introduced also some code cleanup so it is the main reason
we commit anyway.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Use a polynomial weighted evaluation to calculate
material value.
This is far more flexible and elegant then applying
a series of single euristic rules as before.
Also correct a design issue in which we returned two
values, one for middle game and one for endgame, while
instead, because game phase is a function of board
material itself, only one value should be calculated and
used both for mid and end game.
Verified it is equivalent to the tuning branch results with
parameter values sampled after 40.000 games.
After 999 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +277 =482 -240 51.85% 518.0/999 +13 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
