1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sockspls/badfish synced 2025-04-30 08:43:09 +00:00
Commit graph

253 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joost VandeVondele
c6839a2615 Small cleanups
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2546

No functional change.
2020-03-01 09:31:58 +01:00
Joost VandeVondele
be5a2f015e Fix for incorrect VALUE_MATE_IN_MAX_PLY usage.
Fixes #2533, fixes #2543, fixes #2423.

the code that prevents false mate announcements depending on the TT
state (GHI), incorrectly used VALUE_MATE_IN_MAX_PLY. The latter
constant, however, also includes, counterintuitively, the TB win range.

This patch fixes that, by restoring the behavior for TB win scores,
while retaining the false mate correctness, and improving the mate
finding ability. In particular

no alse mates are announced with the poisened hash testcase
```
position fen 8/8/8/3k4/8/8/6K1/7R w - - 0 1
go depth 40
position fen 8/8/8/3k4/8/8/6K1/7R w - - 76 1
go depth 20
ucinewgame
```

mates are found with the testcases reported in #2543
```
position fen 4k3/3pp3/8/8/8/8/2PPP3/4K3 w - - 0 1
setoption name Hash value 1024
go depth 55
ucinewgame
```
and
```
position fen 4k3/4p3/8/8/8/8/3PP3/4K3 w - - 0 1
setoption name Hash value 1024
go depth 45
ucinewgame
```

furthermore, on the mate finding benchmark (ChestUCI_23102018.epd),
performance improves over master, roughly reaching performance with the
false mate protection reverted
```
Analyzing 6566 mate positions for best and found mates:

                 ----------------best ---------------found
           nodes master revert  fixed master revert  fixed
        16000000   4233   4236   4235   5200   5201   5199
        32000000   4583   4585   4585   5417   5424   5418
        64000000   4852   4853   4855   5575   5584   5579
       128000000   5071   5068   5066   5710   5720   5716
       256000000   5280   5282   5279   5819   5827   5826
       512000000   5471   5468   5468   5919   5935   5932
```

On a testcase with TB enabled, progress is made consistently, contrary
to master
```
setoption name SyzygyPath value ../../../syzygy/3-4-5/
setoption name Hash value 2048
position fen 1R6/3k4/8/K2p4/4n3/2P5/8/8 w - - 0 1
go depth 58
ucinewgame
```

The PR (prior to a rewrite for clarity)

passed STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50}
Total: 65405 W: 12454 L: 12384 D: 40567
Ptnml(0-2): 920, 7256, 16285, 7286, 944
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e441a3be70d848499f63d15

passed LTC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50}
Total: 27096 W: 3477 L: 3413 D: 20206
Ptnml(0-2): 128, 2215, 8776, 2292, 122
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5e44e277e70d848499f63d63

The incorrectly named VALUE_MATE_IN_MAX_PLY and VALUE_MATED_IN_MAX_PLY
were renamed into VALUE_TB_WIN_IN_MAX_PLY and VALUE_TB_LOSS_IN_MAX_PLY,
and correclty defined VALUE_MATE_IN_MAX_PLY and VALUE_MATED_IN_MAX_PLY
were introduced.

One further (corner case) mistake using these constants was fixed (go
mate X), which could lead to a premature return if X > MAX_PLY / 2,
but TB were present.

Thanks to @svivanov72 for one of the reports and help fixing the issue.

closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2552

Bench: 4932981
2020-02-15 15:10:07 +01:00
Alain SAVARD
09bef14c76 Update lists of authors and contributors
Preparing for version 11 of Stockfish: update lists of authors,
contributors giving CPU time to the fishtest framework, etc.

No functional change
2020-01-09 01:43:47 +01:00
SFisGOD
474d133565 Combo of Parameter Tweaks
This patch is a combo of the following tweaks:

Complexity parameters
Knight PSQT
Bishop PSQT
King PSQT
Piece Values

Passed STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-1.50,4.50]
Total: 56527 W: 12326 L: 12052 D: 32149
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5dbbca3f0ebc5925b64ee6d6

Passed LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 64010 W: 10549 L: 10199 D: 43262
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5dbc30dc0ebc5925b64eee0c

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2390

Bench: 4312945
2019-11-02 21:19:35 +01:00
Stéphane Nicolet
90c0385724 Assorted trivial cleanups
- Cleanups by Alain
- Group king attacks and king defenses
- Signature of futility_move_count()
- Use is_discovery_check_on_king()
- Simplify backward definition
- Use static asserts in move generator
- Factor a statement in move generator

No functional change
2019-10-26 00:29:12 +02:00
Brian Sheppard
ca7d4e9ac7 Eliminate ONE_PLY
Simplification that eliminates ONE_PLY, based on a suggestion in the forum that
support for fractional plies has never been used, and @mcostalba's openness to
the idea of eliminating it. We lose a little bit of type safety by making Depth
an integer, but in return we simplify the code in search.cpp quite significantly.

No functional change

------------------------------------------

The argument favoring eliminating ONE_PLY:

* The term “ONE_PLY” comes up in a lot of forum posts (474 to date)
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/fishcooking/ONE_PLY%7Csort:relevance

* There is occasionally a commit that breaks invariance of the code
with respect to ONE_PLY
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/fishcooking/ONE_PLY%7Csort:date/fishcooking/ZIPdYj6k0fk/KdNGcPWeBgAJ

* To prevent such commits, there is a Travis CI hack that doubles ONE_PLY
and rechecks bench

* Sustaining ONE_PLY has, alas, not resulted in any improvements to the
  engine, despite many individuals testing many experiments over 5 years.

The strongest argument in favor of preserving ONE_PLY comes from @locutus:
“If we use par example ONE_PLY=256 the parameter space is increases by the
factor 256. So it seems very unlikely that the optimal setting is in the
subspace of ONE_PLY=1.”

There is a strong theoretical impediment to fractional depth systems: the
transposition table uses depth to determine when a stored result is good
enough to supply an answer for a current search. If you have fractional
depths, then different pathways to the position can be at fractionally
different depths.

In the end, there are three separate times when a proposal to remove ONE_PLY
was defeated by the suggestion to “give it a few more months.” So… it seems
like time to remove this distraction from the community.

See the pull request here:
https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2289
2019-10-06 00:57:00 +02:00
nickpelling
d232a4ae68 Clarify the mapping of files to queenside
This patch replaces the obscure expressions mapping files ABCDEFGH to ABCDDCBA
by explicite calls to an auxiliary function:

  old:   f = min(f, ~f)
  new:   f = map_to_queenside(f)

We used the Golbolt web site (https://godbolt.org) to check that the current
code for the auxiliary function is optimal.

STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 30292 W: 6756 L: 6651 D: 16885
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5d8676720ebc5971531d6aa1

Achieved with a bit of help from Sopel97, snicolet and vondele, thanks everyone!
Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2325

No functional change
2019-09-24 10:05:54 +02:00
Stéphane Nicolet
302e0f70c6 Revert "Clarify the mapping of files to queenside"
This reverts commit 7756344d5d.
2019-09-23 09:10:28 +02:00
Stéphane Nicolet
7756344d5d Clarify the mapping of files to queenside
Author: @nickpelling

We replace in the code the obscure expressions mapping files ABCDEFGH to ABCDDCBA
by an explicite call to an auxiliary function :

  old:   f = min(f, ~f)
  new:   f = map_to_queenside(f)

We used the Golbolt web site (https://godbolt.org) to find the optimal code
for the auxiliary function.

STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 30292 W: 6756 L: 6651 D: 16885
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5d8676720ebc5971531d6aa1

No functional change
2019-09-23 08:54:20 +02:00
protonspring
270b241ec1 Simplify Weak Lever
This is a simplification that integrated WeakLever into doubled pawns.
Since we already check for !support for Doubled pawns, it is trivial
to check for weak lever by just checking more_than_one(lever).

We also introduce the Score * bool operation overload to remove some
casts in the code.

STC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 26757 W: 5842 L: 5731 D: 15184
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5d77ee220ebc5902d384e5a4

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2295

No functional change
2019-09-12 09:44:40 +02:00
Stefan Geschwentner
61f44ce578 Update reverse move stats
For a good quiet non-pawn move consider the reverse move as bad
and update the main history with a negative stat bonus.

STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.50,4.50]
Total: 19292 W: 4401 L: 4141 D: 10750
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5d7751d50ebc594e7864973c

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 111952 W: 18762 L: 18275 D: 74915
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5d7771cf0ebc594e786498fa

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2294

Bench: 3914238
2019-09-11 18:37:08 +02:00
protonspring
3984b8f8f0 Consolidate CastlingSide and CastlingRights
This is a non-functional simplification that removes CastlingSide and
implements the functionality in CastlingRights (thanks to Jörg Oster
for a comment on the first version of this patch).

STC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 53854 W: 12077 L: 12019 D: 29758
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5d517b940ebc5925cf107474

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2265

No functional change
2019-08-23 16:29:29 +02:00
protonspring
aec918a2b6 Remove operators for color
This is a non-functional and untested simplification. The increment operator
for color isn't really necessary and seems a bit unnatural to me.

Passed STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 47027 W: 10589 L: 10518 D: 25920
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5d3472d10ebc5925cf0e8d3e

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2247

No functional change
2019-07-26 02:12:23 +02:00
Sergei Ivanov
8b4521df83 Do not define increment operators on Value, Depth and Direction
These operators are never used and do not make sense for these types.

No functional change.
2019-06-27 09:05:03 +02:00
Marco Costalba
d39bc2efa1 Assorted trivial cleanups 5/2019
No functional change.

bench: 4178282
2019-06-09 14:57:08 +02:00
Joost VandeVondele
893a08a8c2 Allow for higher depths. (#2147)
High rootDepths, selDepths and generally searches are increasingly
common with long time control games, analysis, and improving hardware.
In this case, depths of MAX_DEPTH/MAX_PLY (128) can be reached,
and the search tree is truncated.

In principle MAX_PLY can be easily increased, except for a technicality
of storing depths in a signed 8 bit int in the TT. This patch increases
MAX_PLY by storing the depth in an unsigned 8 bit, after shifting by the
most negative depth stored in TT (DEPTH_NONE).

No regression at STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 42235 W: 9565 L: 9484 D: 23186
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5cdb35360ebc5925cf0595e1

Verified to reach high depths on
k1b5/1p1p4/pP1Pp3/K2pPp2/1P1p1P2/3P1P2/5P2/8 w - -
info depth 142 seldepth 154 multipv 1 score cp 537 nodes 26740713110 ...

No bench change.
2019-05-15 09:52:27 +02:00
SFisGOD
58bbbd176b Pawn value tweak
STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 47166 W: 10664 L: 10311 D: 26191
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5c7dfc370ebc5925cffdf830

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 35439 W: 6034 L: 5767 D: 23638
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5c7e41020ebc5925cffdfe9b

Bench: 3470519
2019-03-05 14:54:25 +01:00
Marco Costalba
05f7d59a9a Assorted trivial cleanups 1/2019
To address #1862

No functional change.
2019-02-08 10:20:43 +01:00
Marco Costalba
3c576efa77 Delay castling legality check
Delay legality check of castling moves at search time,
just before making the move, as is the standard with all
the other move types.

This should avoid an useless and not trivial legality check
when the castling is then not tried later. For instance due
to a previous cut-off.

The patch is also a big simplification and allows to entirely
remove generate_castling()

Bench changes due to a different move sequence out of MovePicker.

STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 45073 W: 9918 L: 9843 D: 25312
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5c2f176f0ebc596a450bdfb3

LTC:
LLR: 3.15 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 10156 W: 1707 L: 1560 D: 6889
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5c2e7dfd0ebc596a450bcdf4

Verified with perft both in standard and Chess960 cases.

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1929

Bench: 3559104
2019-01-04 14:23:14 +01:00
protonspring
fefc0c6789 simplify opposite_colors 2018-12-09 12:59:57 +01:00
Stéphane Nicolet
cf5d683408 Stockfish 10-beta
Preparation commit for the upcoming Stockfish 10 version, giving a chance to catch last minute feature bugs and evaluation regression during the one-week code freeze period. Also changing the copyright dates to include 2019.

No functional change
2018-11-19 11:18:21 +01:00
SFisGOD
cd732c080b Pawn and Piece Values Tuned at LTC
Failed STC
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 27487 W: 5846 L: 5903 D: 15738
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5be1d3190ebc595e0ae2e5b8

Passed 1st LTC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 38503 W: 6270 L: 5999 D: 26234
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5be1f5ef0ebc595e0ae2e750

Passed 2nd LTC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 34016 W: 5584 L: 5326 D: 23106
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5be2a1970ebc595e0ae2f1b4

This pull request lead to an interesting discussion about testing
methodology for Stockfish:
https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1804

Bench: 3647775
2018-11-08 16:34:10 +01:00
SFisGOD
4a0db9ea3c Combo
Combo of two parameter tweaks and tuned values for Queen and ThreatByKing.

STC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 20180 W: 4439 L: 4198 D: 11543
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5bd7b8250ebc595e0ae22e97

LTC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 86312 W: 14106 L: 13685 D: 58521
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5bd803560ebc595e0ae23213

This combo consists of the following:

Queen Value (tuned values)
Iter: 72056, A: 5000, alpha 0.602000, gamma 0.101000, clipping old, rounding deterministic
param: QueenValueMg, best: 2528.91, start: 2528.00
param: QueenValueEg, best: 2687.12, start: 2698.00

ThreatByKing (tuned values)
Green STC (50.8k games)
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5bd1d5a00ebc595e0ae1cbec
LTC (I stopped this test at 71.2k games. It's likely yellow.)
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5bd263e70ebc595e0ae1d77e

WeakUnopposedPawn (tweak) by xoto (https://github.com/xoto10)
Green STC (102.8k games)
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5bd306bb0ebc595e0ae1e146
Yellow LTC (90.8k games)
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5bd3ea660ebc595e0ae1f16b

aspiTune1 (tweak) by vondele (https://github.com/vondele)
Green STC (125.9k games)
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5bd2ae100ebc595e0ae1dab0
Yellow LTC (107.9k games)
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5bd3eb700ebc595e0ae1f16f

Thank you @31m059 (Mark Tenzer) for helping me! Also, thank you very much
for recognizing my efforts. I genuinely appreciate it.

Bench: 3556672
2018-11-01 15:39:19 +01:00
mstembera
542a2b39ed Small simplification in castling rights
There is no need for a special struct with a static member
to generate castling rights.

No functional change.
2018-10-21 08:15:04 +02:00
Alain SAVARD
4d22d3e52d Remove pawncount array in imbalance
This is a natural follow up to last commit where values on the
QuadraticOurs diagonal and some piece value deltas were changed.
@Stefano80 tried to simplify the newly introduced pawncount array
using QuadraticOurs[1][1] =52 and a -30 adjustment on pawn values

His STC [-3,1] was green
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b707f5b0ebc5902bdba2745
but not his LTC[-3,1]
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b7095700ebc5902bdba2a49

So I started a 80000 30+0.3 SPSA on the QuadraticOurs diagonal and
on the piece values using @Stefano80 start values.

SPSA gave the new values QuadraticOurs[1][1] =38 and a -33 on pawn
values (the other changes on QuadraticOurs were kept, but were not
ignificant according to this test
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b710ccb0ebc5902bdba2f27)

STC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b710b220ebc5902bdba2f19
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 50902 W: 11214 L: 11150 D: 28538

LTC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b7124ef0ebc5902bdba3106
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 34271 W: 5852 L: 5753 D: 22666

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1735

bench: 4738555
2018-08-14 08:36:27 +02:00
GuardianRM
41cc4eb953 Non-linear bonus for pawn count
This patch introduces a non-linear bonus for pawns, along with some
(linear) corrections for the other pieces types.

The original values were obtained by a massive non-linear tuning of both
pawns and other pieces by GuardianRM, while Alain Savard and Chris Cain
later simplified the patch by observing that, apart from the pawn case, the
tuned corrections were in fact almost affine and could be incorporated in
our current code base via the piece values in types.h (offset) and the diagonal
of the quadratic matrix (slope). See discussion in PR#1725 :
https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1725

STC:
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 42948 W: 9662 L: 9317 D: 23969
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b6ff6e60ebc5902bdba1d87

LTC:
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 19683 W: 3409 L: 3206 D: 13068
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b702dbd0ebc5902bdba216b

How to continue from there?
- Maybe the non-linearity for the pawn value could be somewhat tempered
  again and a simpler linear correction for pawns would work?

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1734

Bench: 4681496
2018-08-12 18:40:11 +02:00
Stefano Cardanobile
b5581b7779 Combo of several promising parameter tweaks
Combo of several tuning patches which finished yellow at LTC.

[STC](http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b6ead340ebc5902bdba14ce)
LR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 10668 W: 2445 L: 2239 D: 5984
Elo: 6.25 [1.76,10.69] (95%)

[LTC](http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b6eb50e0ebc5902bdba151f)
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 23761 W: 4155 L: 3923 D: 15683
Elo: 3.02 [0.29,5.67] (95%)

Original patches:
- [Piece values](http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b6d2cc00ebc5902bdba02d5) by Stefano Cardanobile
- [Stat bonus](http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b6adbc90ebc5902bdb9da73) by Stefan Geschwentner
- [Rook on pawn](http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b62a95b0ebc5902bdb961c0) by Mark Tenzer
- [Hanging bonus](http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b5d2fa00ebc5902bdb90855) by Ivan Ilvec
- [ss tweak](http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5b58b7240ebc5902bdb89025) by miguel-l

Bench: 4694813
2018-08-12 10:09:30 +02:00
DU-jdto
a05793517f Minor code style tweaks
No functional change.
2018-07-18 08:26:33 +02:00
Stefano80
213166ba22 Always scale using pawn contribution
This is a further step in the long quest for a simple way of determining
scale factors for the endgame.

Here we remove the artificial restriction in evaluate_scale_factor()
based on endgame score. Also SCALE_FACTOR_ONEPAWN can be simplified
away. The latter is a small non functional simplification with respect
to the version that was testedin the framework, verified on bench with
depth 22 for good measure.

Passed STC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 49438 W: 9999 L: 9930 D: 29509
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ae20c8b0ebc5963175205c8

Passed LTC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 101445 W: 15113 L: 15110 D: 71222
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ae2a0560ebc5902a1998986

How to continue from there?

Maybe the general case could be scaled with pawns from both colors
without losing Elo. If that is the case, then this could be merged
somehow with the scaling in evaluate_initiative(), which also uses
a additive malus down when the number of pawns in the position goes
down.

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1570

Bench: 5254862
2018-04-29 07:26:25 +02:00
Joost VandeVondele
0cfb653eec Simplify Singular Extension condition
Avoid defining a singly used variable, removes one condition.

passed STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 53489 W: 10814 L: 10752 D: 31923
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ac08a8d0ebc590e9457cd94

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1530

No functional change.
2018-04-03 00:13:38 +02:00
Stéphane Nicolet
5ce630584c Tweak queen values for midgame and endgame
Queen midgame value: -1%
Queen endgame value: +1%

This patch failed STC, but was exceptionally tested at LTC,
where it passed two independant SPRT tests with bounds [0..4]:

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 20651 W: 3191 L: 2980 D: 14480
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ab73faa0ebc5902932cbdca

LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 89111 W: 13647 L: 13233 D: 62231
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ab8c0e50ebc5902932cbeae

See https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1511
for the discussion of this patch.

How to continue from there?
• there is probably some more Elo gains to get from the tuning
of the queen value.

Bench: 5460229
2018-03-27 17:51:11 +02:00
Ronald de Man
759b3c79cf Mark all compile-time constants as constexpr.
To more clearly distinguish them from "const" local variables, this patch
defines compile-time local constants as constexpr. This is consistent with
the definition of PvNode as constexpr in search() and qsearch(). It also
makes the code more robust, since the compiler will now check that those
constants are indeed compile-time constants.

We can go even one step further and define all the evaluation and search
compile-time constants as constexpr.

In generate_castling() I replaced "K" with "step", since K was incorrectly
capitalised (in the Chess960 case).

In timeman.cpp I had to make the non-local constants MaxRatio and StealRatio
constepxr, since otherwise gcc would complain when calculating TMaxRatio and
TStealRatio. (Strangely, I did not have to make Is64Bit constexpr even though
it is used in ucioption.cpp in the calculation of constexpr MaxHashMB.)

I have renamed PieceCount to pieceCount in material.h, since the values of
the array are not compile-time constants.

Some compile-time constants in tbprobe.cpp were overlooked. Sides and MaxFile
are not compile-time constants, so were renamed to sides and maxFile.

Non-functional change.
2018-03-18 23:48:16 +01:00
Alain SAVARD
1093047e7d Two steps slider threats on queen
Allow a potential slider threat from a square currently occupied
by a harmless attacker, just as the recent "knight on queen" patch.
Also from not completely safe squares, use the mobilityArea instead
of excluding all pawns for both SlidersOnQueen and KnightOnQueen

We now compute the potential sliders threat on queen only if opponent
has one queen.

Run as SPRT [0,4] since it is some kind of simplification but maybe
not clearly one.

STC:
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5aa1ddf10ebc590297cb63d8
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 22997 W: 4817 L: 4570 D: 13610

LTC:
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5aa1fe6b0ebc590297cb63e5
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 11926 W: 1891 L: 1705 D: 8330

After this patch is committed, we may try to:

• re-introduce some "threat by queen" bonus to make Stockfish's queen
  more aggressive (attacking aspect)

• introduce a concept of "queen overload" to force the opponent queen
  into passivity and protecting duties (defensive aspect)

• more generally, re-tune the queen mobility array since patches in the
  last three months have affected a lot the location/activity of queens.

Closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1473

bench: 5788691
2018-03-09 21:47:44 +01:00
Joost VandeVondele
9afa1d7330 New Year 2018
Adjust copyright headers.

No functional change.
2018-01-01 13:18:10 +01:00
Stéphane Nicolet
54f6ce70fd Avoid warnings by the Clang compiler
Clang gave a couple of warnings for unused parameters after the recnet commit "Use constexpr when makes sense".

No functional change.
2017-12-04 17:53:42 +01:00
syzygy1
822695d4d3 Use a Direction enum for Square deltas
Currently the NORTH/WEST/SOUTH/EAST values are of type Square, but conceptually they are not squares but directions. This patch separates these values into a Direction enum and overloads addition and subtraction to allow adding a Square to a Direction (to get a new Square).

I have also slightly trimmed the possible overloadings to improve type safety. For example, it would normally not make sense to add a Color to a Color or a Piece to a Piece, or to multiply or divide them by an integer. It would also normally not make sense to add a Square to a Square.

This is a non-functional change.
2017-12-04 17:52:31 +01:00
Guy Vreuls
28b6a457c2 Use constexpr when makes sense
No functional change.
2017-12-03 12:44:24 +01:00
Stefan Geschwentner
a87a1005ad Attack threats
Give bonus for safe attack threats from bishops and rooks on opponent queen

STC:
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8629 W: 1599 L: 1438 D: 5592
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5a1ad4490ebc590ccbb8b30d

LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 7093 W: 987 L: 846 D: 5260
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5a1aec5d0ebc590ccbb8b317

Bench: 5051254
2017-12-03 10:41:48 +01:00
Marco Costalba
7aa7dfd4df Fix some Clang warnings
Found by Clang in extra verbose mode :-)

No functional change.
2017-08-19 14:32:31 +02:00
Rocky640
b24bd762b2 Rework the "unsupported" penalty into a "supported" bonus
A pawn (according to all the searched positions of a bench run) is not supported 85% of the time,
(in current master it is either isolated, backward or "unsupported").

So it made sense to try moving the S(17, 8) "unsupported" penalty value into the base pawn value hoping for a more representative pawn value, and accordingly
a) adjust backward and isolated so that they stay more or less the same as master
b) increase the mg connected bonus in the supported case by S(17, 0) and let the Connected formula find a suitable eg value according to rank.

Tested as a simplification SPRT(-3, 1)

Passed STC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5970dbd30ebc5916ff649dd6
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 19613 W: 3663 L: 3540 D: 12410

Passed LTC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/597137780ebc5916ff649de3
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 24721 W: 3306 L: 3191 D: 18224

Bench: 5581946

Closes #1179
2017-08-01 18:37:54 -07:00
Marco Costalba
ecd3218b6b History code rewrite (#1122)
Rearrange and rename all history heuristic code. Naming
is now based on chessprogramming.wikispaces.com conventions
and the relations among the various heuristics are now more
clear and consistent.

No functional change.
2017-05-26 08:42:50 +02:00
FauziAkram
6b4959e3e0 Linear Protector bonus by distance
Replacing the old Protector table with a simple linear formula which takes into account a different slope for each different piece type.

The idea of this simplification of Protector is originated by Alain (Rocky)

STC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 70382 W: 12859 L: 12823 D: 44700

LTC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 61554 W: 8098 L: 8031 D: 45425

Bench: 6107863

Closes #1099
2017-05-07 21:11:51 -07:00
Marco Costalba
25296547d0 Move Pieces[] out of global visibility
It is an helper array used only in position.cpp

Also small code tidy up while there.

No functional change.

Closes #1106
2017-05-07 20:20:02 -07:00
FauziAkram
c243cd5f4a Variable tuning
A tuning patch which cover the following changes:

increase the importance of queen and rook mobility in endgame and
decrease it in mg, since if we use the heavy pieces too early in the game
we will just make opponent develop their pieces by threatening ours.

King Psqt:
1)King will be encouraged more to stay in the first ranks in the MG
2)and will be encouraged more to go to the middle of the board/last ranks in the EG

Bishop scale better in EG
Logical changes on various psqt tables
1/6 of the changes of the last tuning session on mobility tables

STC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 227879 W: 41240 L: 40313 D: 146326
LTC : LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 167047 W: 21871 L: 21291 D: 123885

Bench: 5695960

Closes #1008
2017-02-19 14:00:44 -08:00
Stéphane Nicolet
d2971f3fca Check for overflow in Score * int multiplication (#969)
Add asserts to check for overflow in Score * int multiplication.

There is no overflow in current master, but it would be easy to
create one as the scale of the current eval does not leave many
spare bits. For instance, adding the following unused variables
in master at the end of evaluate() (line 882 of evaluate.cpp)
overflows:

Score s1 = score * 4;  // no overflow
Score s2 = score * 5;  // overflow

Assertion failed: (eg_value(result) == (i * eg_value(s))),
function operator*, file ./types.h, line 336.

Same md5 checksum as current master for non debug compiles.

No functional change.
2017-01-11 18:11:17 +01:00
Joost VandeVondele
d8f683760c Adjust copyright headers to 2017 (#965)
No functional change.
2017-01-11 08:46:29 +01:00
Joost VandeVondele
8ceb1ff53b Fix undefined behavior
This fixes #892. Undefined behavior as seen with
clang -fsanitize=undefined.

No functional change.
2016-11-26 16:49:59 +01:00
Joost Vandevondele
40b1b27178 Fix a series of undefined behaviours
Avoid shifting negative signed integers and use typed
enum to avoids decrementing a variable beyond its defined
range, like:
       for (Rank r = RANK_8; r >= RANK_1; --r)

Changes were tested individually and passed SPRT[-3, 1].

With this patch gcc --sanitize builds cleanly.

No functional change.
2016-10-27 06:44:41 +02:00
Stéphane Nicolet
7ae3c05795 Rename shift_bb() to shift()
Rename shift_bb() to shift(), and DELTA_S to SOUTH, etc.
to improve code readability, especially in evaluate.cpp
when they are used together:

    old b = shift_bb<DELTA_S>(pos.pieces(PAWN))
    new b = shift<SOUTH>(pos.pieces(PAWN))

While there fix some small code style issues.

No functional change.
2016-09-25 10:45:10 +02:00
Stéphane Nicolet
ea41f18e6e Swap mg and eg in internal representation of Score
Instrumentation shows that in make_score(mg, eg) calls, the mg value is
zero in 25,9% of the calls while the eg value is zero in 36,8% of the
calls.

Swapping the internal fields of mg and eg in the internal
representation of Score allows the compiler to optimize away the shift
in (eg << 16) + mg in more cases, thus resulting in a 0.3% speed-up
overall.

No functional change
2016-09-17 09:56:36 +02:00