This was subtle and google was my friend.
The leak was in _dl_allocate_tls called by pthread_create() and
is due to the fact that threads are created in joinable state so that
once terminated are not freed. To make the thread to release
its resources upon termination we should set them in detached state.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems we have a speed regression under Linux, anyhow
commit and revert to leave some documentation in case we
want to try again in the future.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Let to sleep even split point master, it will be waken up
by its slaves when they return from the search.
With this patch we get maximum HT speedup
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It has more sense to treat the two evaluation metrics
in the same way.
As a side effect now we use the correct eval margin when
pruning in a SplitPoint node.
No functional change in single thread.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Fix the movcount updating bug and let search() to completely
subsititute sp_search().
No functional change even with fakes split.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
There is a bug in the conversion that is triggered when testing
with faked split and that I missed somehow :-(
To allow proper testing on cluster restore old sp_search()
until I don't fiugre up what's happened.
Restored to be functional equivalent to old behaviour both in
single thread and in faked split.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
When entering and exiting from think() we don't need any special
wake up / sleeping code because we want available threads to keep
sleeping.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This simple patch has devastating consequences ;-)
Now an available thread goes to sleep and is waked up after
being allocated.
This patch allows Stockfish to dramatically increase performances
on HyperThreading systems.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
They are fast and also have the same semantic of Linux ones.
This allow to simplify the code and especially to use
SleepConditionVariableSRW() to wait on a condition releaseing the lock,
this has the same semantic as pthread_cond_wait().
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is a prerequisite for future work and anyhow removes
a state flag, so it is good anyhow.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is redundant and complicates the already complicated
SMP code for no reason.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We already do this for locks. Also rename SitIdleEvent
in WaitCond to be uniform with Lunix naming.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is the native way done in Windows and we will use it
for future work, so change Linux to do the same.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It has more sense to treat the two evaluation metrics
in the same way.
As a side effect now we use the correct eval margin when
pruning in a SplitPoint node.
No functional change in single thread.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Rewrite sp_search() to have same signature of search()
This is the first prerequistite step toward unification.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Actually it is an error to update back moveCount value after split()
because it is used in update_history() to access movesSearched[]
array. But becasue this vector is not updated in the split point
we end up with an access of stale data.
Bug has been hidden til now because we 'forgot' to update
moveCount before returning from split().
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Mostly suggested by Justin (UncombedCoconut), the 0ULL -> 0 conversion
is mine.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This patch from Joona greatly reduces move count pruning,
below is the old and new move count limits starting from
ONE_PLY with half-play increment:
Old: 4,5,5,5, 7, 7,11,11,11,19,19,19,35,35
New: 4,5,7,9,12,15,19,23,28,33,39,45,52,59
Surprisingly results are even a bit better at a quite
fast time control.
After 5260 games at 30"+0.1
Mod - Orig: 864 - 806 - 3590 ELO +3 (+- 3.8)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems totally unuseful because killers are not
used to order the moves in qsearch. Although there
is some functionality change, probably just a small
side effect.
After 5656 games on rc
Mod vs Orig: 1007 - 980 - 3669 ELO +1 (+- 3.7)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
So there is no need to explicitly check for king moves
when detecting prunable evasions.
Perhaps teoretically a very bit slower (I didn't test),
but it is more clear now what evasions we consider prunable.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
A code semplification that could even be a slight increase,
anyhow is a reducing pruning patch, so it is good even
at equal strenght.
After 6342 games
Mod - Orig: 1040 - 974 - 4328 ELO +3 (+- 3.5)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
And rename in nodes now that we have only one.
After the beta-cut off counters removing we can
get rid also of this one.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
For now keep FutilityMarginsMatrix[] unchanged, in
future we are going to reduce to compensate for extra
margin.
At this moment it is enough we don't have regressions.
After 9694 games on russian cluster
Mod - Orig 1608 - 1578 - 6508 ELO +1 (+- 2.8)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It will be more clear when we will go to add stuff
apart from king danger itself.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We don't need that !
We can infere from starting fen string if we are in
a Chess960 game or not. And note that this is a per-position
property, not an application wide one.
A nice trick is to use a custom manipulator (that is an
enum actually) to keep using the handy operator<<() on the
move when sending to std::cout, yes, I have indulged a
bit here ;-)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After testing on our russian cluster: +3 elo after 4200 games
So keep it becuase it allows a good semplification.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
When depth < DEPTH_ZERO we store with the same depth all
the positions, use -OnePly instead of -1 for consistency
with depth arithmetic.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
