1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/sockspls/badfish synced 2025-04-30 08:43:09 +00:00
Commit graph

3839 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marco Costalba
3e739f883f Reformat stats update
Rewritten in a way to have explicit in the search
the bonus/penalty we apply: hopefully this will lead
to further simplification/fix of current rather messy
stats update code.

No functional change.
2016-08-25 09:51:50 +02:00
VoyagerOne
0b4f6e562b Refutation penalty on captures
Apply refutation penalty for prior PV quiet move on captures

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8208 W: 1153 L: 1008 D: 6047
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/57bc5a9f0ebc59030fbe47b5

Only LTC because a very similar patch already passed STC + LTC

bench: 7038730
2016-08-24 08:26:32 +02:00
VoyagerOne
5596492f6e Simplify IID
STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 30468 W: 5687 L: 5582 D: 19199
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/57b1ddd80ebc591c761f63e2

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 87406 W: 11756 L: 11725 D: 63925
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/57b212590ebc591c761f63f9

bench: 6554900
2016-08-19 08:59:18 +02:00
VoyagerOne
8493c8c6b8 Do LMR on captures
STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5361 W: 1086 L: 936 D: 3339
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/57b31b0f0ebc591c761f643d

LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 54694 W: 7591 L: 7287 D: 39816
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/57b3442b0ebc591c761f6450

bench: 6881120
2016-08-19 08:50:14 +02:00
Marco Costalba
e3af492142 Remove a stale assignment
No more used after previous patch.

Spotted by Jekaa .

No functional change.
2016-08-18 10:40:56 +02:00
Stefano80
9585f8ef58 Retire pawn span
Retire pawn span and replace with pawn count in evaluate_scale_factor.

STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 26482 W: 4929 L: 4818 D: 16735

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 61938 W: 8400 L: 8335 D: 45203

Bench: 7662861
2016-08-18 10:16:56 +02:00
VoyagerOne
7396c08b79 Use predicted depth for history pruning
STC: (Yellow)
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 69115 W: 12880 L: 12797 D: 43438

LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 124163 W: 16923 L: 16442 D: 90798

Note: Note based off past experiments / patches... history pruning
is quite TC sensitive. I believe the reason for this TC dependency
is that the CMH/FMH is a very large table that takes time to fill
up with. In addition having more time for will increase the accuracy
of the stats' value.

Bench: 7351698
2016-08-15 14:45:40 +02:00
Luca Brivio
3d10cfcdd2 Cap space evaluation bonus
When computing space evaluation, limit the bonus square count to 16.

STC @ 10+0.1 th 1:
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 30793 W: 5910 L: 5648 D: 19235

LTC @ 60+0.6 th 1:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 31361 W: 4410 L: 4184 D: 22767

Bench: 7165385
2016-08-13 10:12:09 +02:00
Alain SAVARD
8abb98455f Simplify space formula
STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 16868 W: 3260 L: 3132 D: 10476

LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 16910 W: 2381 L: 2255 D: 12274

bench: 6663531
2016-08-10 12:49:24 +02:00
VoyagerOne
b3525fa9ea Use Color-From-To history stats to help sort moves
STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 33502 W: 6498 L: 6223 D: 20781
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/578abb940ebc5972faa169e2

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 50782 W: 7124 L: 6832 D: 36826
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/578b8e5d0ebc5972faa169fd

LTC: (Sanity test against latest master)
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 32759 W: 4600 L: 4370 D: 23789
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5798b7d30ebc591c761f5b72

bench: 6985912

P.S. Thanks @mstembera for rewriting my code to make it smp compatible. A BIG thank you!
2016-08-02 09:17:14 +02:00
VoyagerOne
85924db496 Futility tweak
Use a different margin for pruning child nodes.

STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 16692 W: 3251 L: 3051 D: 10390
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/579b95d10ebc591c761f5c03

LTC:
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 24140 W: 3501 L: 3297 D: 17342
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/579bb15d0ebc591c761f5c0b

Bench: 7927017
2016-08-01 21:47:42 +02:00
ajithcj
f2f3a06a1a Allow null pruning at depth 1
This removes a check that prevents null pruning at depth 1 PLY.

STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 23445 W: 4638 L: 4521 D: 14286

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 61416 W: 8627 L: 8563 D: 44226

bench: 8145304
2016-07-24 09:54:07 +02:00
Stefano80
714329dbdc See prune at higher depth
Allow SEE pruning at higher depths in shallow depth
pruning using a threshold increasing with depth.

STC
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 35366 W: 7011 L: 6724 D: 21631

LTC
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 15578 W: 2243 L: 2070 D: 11265

Bench: 8417887
2016-07-24 08:55:58 +02:00
ajithcj
76971d8acb Gradually relax the NMP staticEval check
Gradually relax the NMP staticEval check as we go to
higher depths.

Use tuned values.

STC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 16745 W: 3371 L: 3168 D: 10206

LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5906 W: 875 L: 736 D: 4295

bench: 8548212
2016-07-16 07:35:31 +02:00
Lyudmil Antonov
f619f1d38c Workaround gcc stack alignment bug
GCC uses SSE instructions to move data but in 32-bit gcc version used
by abrok the stack is not 16-byte aligned due to a bug.

This patch workaround teh bug by not using the stack
to store KingFlank[]

Fixes issue #721.

No functional change.
2016-07-16 07:06:13 +02:00
joergoster
82d02a3133 Fix extract_ponder_from_tt()
Checking for legality of a possible ponder move
must be done before we undo the first pv move,
of course. (spotted by mohammed li.)

This obviously only has any effect when playing in ponder mode.

No functional change.
2016-07-12 08:47:21 +02:00
Stéphane Nicolet
1d09ee70f7 King tropism
Bonus for each square that we attack in the flank where the opponent
king is. Squares that we attack twice and are not protected by an enemy
pawn count double.

Passed STC:
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/577dfca60ebc5972faa166b8
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 48373 W: 9832 L: 9481 D: 29060

And LTC:
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/577e77870ebc5972faa166df
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 8881 W: 1408 L: 1255 D: 6218

Bench: 7577046
2016-07-08 09:35:22 +02:00
Alain SAVARD
eb20a87c67 More safe checks
Consider a check given by a rook or a minor to be a "safe check"
also in the case where supported by another piece,
and given on a square only defended by a queen

Was yellow STC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/576fcbc80ebc5972faa163e8
LLR: -2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 55453 W: 10431 L: 10315 D: 34707

Passed LTC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/57733a0b0ebc5972faa164b7
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 54550 W: 7671 L: 7365 D: 39514

bench: 7398346
2016-07-07 08:39:58 +02:00
ajithcj
ade3bb9a4e Use staticEval in null prune condition
Don't null prune at depth < 12 if staticEval < beta

STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 62858 W: 12035 L: 11632 D: 39191

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 49784 W: 7009 L: 6720 D: 36055

bench: 8054611
2016-07-02 16:43:49 +02:00
loco-loco
716a145a6c Removing inCheck condition for counter move bonus
STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 20206 W: 3946 L: 3823 D:

LTC:
LLR: 3.10 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 25004 W: 3512 L: 3390 D: 18102

Bench: 8172428
2016-06-26 10:25:05 +02:00
Marco Costalba
190d2ea4bc Restore standard passed pawn definition
Use the usual and accepted passed pawn semantic
instead of a non-standard one and remove a FIXME.

STC (http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/576401350ebc5972faa1608d):
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 29646 W: 5663 L: 5557 D: 18426

LTC (http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5764e4e90ebc5972faa160c3):
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 40224 W: 5578 L: 5484 D: 29162

bench: 7543902
2016-06-25 11:46:17 +02:00
ElbertoOne
c2c0e6b07d Remove redundant PvNode condition
After commit 6d58bf777c we always call PvNodes
with cutNode set to false.

No functional change.
2016-06-24 08:46:36 +02:00
VoyagerOne
c94145b65c Comment out a redundant condition
Take advantage that VALUE_NONE = 32002 to remove
the condition.

Commented out and not removed becuase it is tricky
to rely on the hidden value of VALUE_NONE and code
can break in case we change VALUE_NONE in the future.

No functional change.
2016-06-24 08:26:39 +02:00
Jonathan Calovski
09efbf915e Remove scalefactor dependency
STC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5764539e0ebc5972faa160a4
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 43878 W: 8289 L: 8208 D: 27381

LTC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5764f0130ebc5972faa160c9
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 39338 W: 5408 L: 5313 D: 28617

bench: 7977279
2016-06-21 09:01:39 +02:00
ElbertoOne
6d58bf777c On IID do not always search with cutNode = true
On IID now search with cutNode value instead of fixed value true.

STC (http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/575fa3860ebc5972faa15f67):
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 163974 W: 30744 L: 30874 D: 102356

LTC (http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5763b0640ebc5972faa16075):
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 48363 W: 6611 L: 6528 D: 35224

Bench: 7806393
2016-06-19 18:04:22 +02:00
VoyagerOne
1c0c4db677 Simplify Check Extension
STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 32704 W: 6146 L: 6045 D: 20513

LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 146622 W: 19967 L: 20017 D: 106638

Bench: 8245662
2016-06-18 08:32:25 +02:00
ajithcj
8e45e70e55 Don't insert pv back into tt
This code was added before the accurate pv patch, when
we retrieved PV directly from TT.

It's not required for correct (and long) PVs any more and
should be safe to remove it.

Also, allowing helper threads to repeatedly over-write
TT doesn't seem to make sense(that was probably an un-intended
side-effect of lazy smp). Before Lazy SMP only Main Thread used
to run ID loop and insert PV into TT.

STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 74346 W: 13946 L: 13918 D: 46482

LTC
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 47265 W: 6531 L: 6447 D: 34287

bench: 8819179
2016-06-15 08:55:40 +02:00
lucasart
126036abb0 Do not hardcode Debug Log File
Allow to specifiy the log file name, this comes
handy in case of self-matches so that each SF
instance writes into a different log file.

No functional change.
2016-06-15 08:47:08 +02:00
Marco Costalba
ca14345ba2 Filter root moves filter before copy to threads
Currently root moves are copied to all teh threads
but are DTZ filtered only in main thread at the
beginning of teh search.

This patch moves the TB filtering before the
copy of root moves fixing issue #679

https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/issues/679

No bench change.
2016-06-11 09:24:40 +02:00
VoyagerOne
7d2a79f037 Stat Formula Tweak
bonus = d * d + 2 * d - 2

STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 99444 W: 18274 L: 17778 D: 63392

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 89757 W: 12285 L: 11896 D: 65576

bench: 8276130
2016-06-10 07:27:47 +02:00
VoyagerOne
7c5d724724 Tweak check extension condition
There are two concepts with this patch:

Limit check extensions by using move count.
The idea is to limit search explosion.

Always extend check if the first move gives check.
The idea is to save expensive SEE calls, since the vast
majority of first move will have SEE value >= 0, also
first move may still be strong even if the SEE is negative.

STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 16503 W: 3068 L: 2873 D: 10562

LTC:
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 37202 W: 5261 L: 5014 D: 26927

bench: 8543366
2016-06-10 07:15:56 +02:00
Alain SAVARD
6fed8ff22a Small Queen simplification
Moving a few lines from evaluate_threats to evaluate_pieces allows to
a) Remove a condition pos.count<QUEEN>(Them) == 1
b) use precalculated s instead of pos.square(Them)
c) do not check the condition at all in queenless endings

Passed STC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5752e0410ebc59029919b1f4
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 67175 W: 12194 L: 12152 D: 42829

and LTC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/57587b140ebc59029919b2f4
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 20276 W: 2774 L: 2653 D: 14849

bench: 7907962
2016-06-10 06:53:07 +02:00
mstembera
0c076f1136 Avoid some redundant scaling function calls
Posted by Mohammed Li here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/fishcooking/N-PHfN0O79o

No functional change.
2016-06-10 06:43:37 +02:00
ElbertoOne
e48c7547c5 LMR reduction parameter tweak
More reduction for cut nodes, less for moves that escape a capture:

STC (http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/57548c1e0ebc59029919b247):
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 60165 W: 11519 L: 11149 D: 37497

LTC (http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/57555b570ebc59029919b260):
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 10353 W: 1493 L: 1317 D: 7543

Bench: 8902859
2016-06-07 15:15:49 +02:00
Marco Costalba
6e2ca97d93 Fix syzygy DTZ bug
In this position: 3K4/8/3k4/8/4p3/4B3/5P2/8 w - - 0 5

Current DTZ probe returns 1 instead of 15

What happens is that the double push f4 is erroneously detected as a win move.

After the push we have:

[D]3K4/8/3k4/8/4pP2/4B3/8/8 b - f3 0 5

And here the code misses the possible ep capture exf3.

The bug is in probe_dtz_no_ep() where is used probe_ab() that is
blind to ep captures so it returns v == 2 (win) for position

3K4/8/3k4/8/4pP2/4B3/8/8 b - f3 0 5

Note that at the caller site the original position did not have any
possible ep capture, so probe_dtz() returns immediately after calling
probe_dtz_no_ep().

The fix is to call the ep-aware probe_wdl() instead of probe_ab()

I have verified that DTZ is correct now and also there are no more
mistmatches compared to the new 'syzygy' branch. Tested on a set of
more than 600 endgame positions, included some tricky ones.

For people interested to redo the test or doing additional tests
please pull branch tb_dbg from https://github.com/mcostalba/Stockfish repo.

bench: 8450534 (bench unaffected because syzygy is not exercized during bench)
2016-06-07 15:06:26 +02:00
VoyagerOne
5f096e9bef Simplify Futility Pruning
Don't update bestValue when futility pruning.

STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 21933 W: 4031 L: 3912 D: 13990

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 46225 W: 6115 L: 6028 D: 34082

Bench: 8450534
2016-06-03 19:58:42 +02:00
ElbertoOne
20023ac9b8 LMR Simplification
LMR simplification that also gives a slight ELO gain, especially at LTC:

STC (http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/574ec8e20ebc59029919b147):
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 32402 W: 5967 L: 5866 D: 20569

LTC (http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/574fbebf0ebc59029919b16d):
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 15103 W: 2103 L: 1975 D: 11025

Bench: 8248133
2016-06-03 19:53:04 +02:00
joergoster
3549d98d07 Tuned values for piece check and attack unit factors
A middle ground patch of two successful tuning patches,
one at STC, the other at LTC, which now passed both.

LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 67893 W: 12777 L: 12384 D: 42732

LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,4.00]
Total: 30165 W: 4189 L: 3960 D: 22016

bench: 9209507
2016-06-03 07:39:27 +02:00
Stéphane Nicolet
07b247f943 Pins or discovered attacks on the opponent's queen
Bonus for pins or discovered attacks on the opponent's queen

STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 32020 W: 5914 L: 5652 D: 20454

LTC:
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 10946 W: 1530 L: 1375 D: 8041

Bench: 7031649
2016-05-28 14:57:58 +02:00
Stéphane Nicolet
abac509ccb Teach check_blockers to check also non-king pieces
This is a prerequisite for next patch

No functional change.
2016-05-28 14:52:21 +02:00
Stéphane Nicolet
ab0f4c0353 Simplify doubled pawn
Only use doubled pawn malus when the doubled pawns are on consecutive squares.

Passed STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 7678 W: 1469 L: 1325 D: 4884

And LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 26739 W: 3562 L: 3449 D: 19728

Bench: 8211685
2016-05-26 12:33:44 +02:00
Leonid Pechenik
71bfbb22fc More detailed dependence of time allocation on the magnitude of score change
10+0.1:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 5657 W: 1130 L: 979 D: 3548

60+0.6:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 36884 W: 5002 L: 4762 D: 27120

bench: 8428997
2016-05-20 19:44:50 +02:00
loco-loco
7cb8cbb403 Assorted pruning tweaks
LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 38257 W: 5206 L: 4961 D: 28090

STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 16550 W: 3110 L: 2914 D: 10526

Bench: 8428997
2016-05-20 19:34:49 +02:00
mstembera
0784bd542b Fix a multiPV bug in lazy SMP
Where the helper threads were not doing multiPV at all.

Regression tested sprt @ 5+0.05 th 7

LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 73918 W: 11891 L: 11853 D: 50174

bench: 8716243
2016-05-14 21:34:55 +02:00
Stéphane Nicolet
16c603ce9b Double pawn simplification
Try doubled pawn simplification, with psq
table compensation.

STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 36094 W: 6558 L: 6463 D: 23073

LTC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 102352 W: 13417 L: 13404 D: 75531

Bench: 8716243
2016-05-13 13:01:59 +02:00
loco-loco
969982406c Merge good and bad quiets
STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 58613 W: 10779 L: 10723 D: 37111

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 33608 W: 4539 L: 4436 D: 24633

Bench: 9441294
2016-05-10 18:15:16 +02:00
Alain SAVARD
4b9ed6566a Unsafe checks
Introducing a new multi-purpose penalty related to King safety, which
includes all kind of potential checks (from unsafe or unavailable
squares currently occupied by some other piece)

This will indirectly detect and reward some pins, discovered checks, and
motifs such as square vacation, or rook behind its pawn and aligned with
King (example Black Rg8, g7 against Kg1),
and penalize some pawn blockers (if they move, it allows a discovered
check by the pawn).

And since it looks also at protected squares, it detects some potential
defense overloading.

Finally, the rook contact checks had been removed some time ago. This
test will give a small bonus for them, as well as for bishop contact
checks.

Passed STC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5729ec740ebc59301a354b36
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 13306 W: 2477 L: 2296 D: 8533

and LTC
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/572a5be00ebc59301a354b65
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,5.00]
Total: 20369 W: 2750 L: 2565 D: 15054

bench: 9298175
2016-05-06 20:04:57 +02:00
Marco Costalba
5e4cd3fc0d Retire __popcnt64 intrinsic
Just use _mm_popcnt_u64() that is available
both for MSVC abd Intel compiler.

Verified on MSVC that the produced assembly
has the hardware 'popcnt' instruction.

No functional change.
2016-05-05 09:09:07 +02:00
VoyagerOne
5486911e01 Simplify History LMR Formula
STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 41713 W: 7589 L: 7504 D: 26620

LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [-3.00,1.00]
Total: 41353 W: 5484 L: 5391 D: 30478

Bench: 8946983
2016-05-05 08:53:50 +02:00
Marco Costalba
3487eb9f9e Fix a warning with MSVC
Introduced by 2dd24dc4e6 ("Use popcount intrinsic with Intel")

No functional change.
2016-05-01 15:10:33 +02:00