If a global function has no previous declaration, either the declaration
is missing in the corresponding header file or the function should be
declared static. Static functions are local to the translation unit,
which allows the compiler to apply some optimizations earlier (when
compiling the translation unit rather than during link-time
optimization).
The commit enables the warning for gcc, clang, and mingw. It also fixes
the reported warnings by declaring the functions static or by adding a
header file (benchmark.h).
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4325
No functional change
Joint work by Ofek Shochat and Stéphane Nicolet.
passed STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 93288 W: 24996 L: 24601 D: 43691
Ptnml(0-2): 371, 10263, 24989, 10642, 379
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/63448f4f4bc7650f07541987
passed LTC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 84168 W: 22771 L: 22377 D: 39020
Ptnml(0-2): 47, 8181, 25234, 8575, 47
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6345186d4bc7650f07542fbd
================
It seems there are two effects with this patch:
effect A :
If Stockfish is winning at root, we have optimism > 0 for all leaves in
the search tree where Stockfish is to move. There, if (psq - nnue) > 0
(ie if the advantage is more materialistic than positional), then the
product D = optimism * (psq - nnue) will be positive, nnueComplexity will
increase, and the eval will increase from SF point of view.
So the effect A is that if Stockfish is winning at root, she will slightly
favor in the search tree (in other words, search more) the positions where
she can convert her advantage via materialist means.
effect B :
If Stockfish is losing at root, we have optimism > 0 for all leaves in
the search tree where the opponent is to move. There, if (psq - nnue) < 0
(ie if the opponent advantage is more positional than materialistic), then
the product D = optimism * (psq-nnue) will be negative, nnueComplexity will
decrease, and the eval will decrease from the opponent point of view.
So the effect B is that Stockfish will slightly favor in the search tree
(search more) the branches where she can defend by slowly reducing the
opponent positional advantage.
=================
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4195
bench: 4673898
First things first...
this PR is being made from court. Today, Tord and Stéphane, with broad support
of the developer community are defending their complaint, filed in Munich, against ChessBase.
With their products Houdini 6 and Fat Fritz 2, both Stockfish derivatives,
ChessBase violated repeatedly the Stockfish GPLv3 license. Tord and Stéphane have terminated
their license with ChessBase permanently. Today we have the opportunity to present
our evidence to the judge and enforce that termination. To read up, have a look at our blog post
https://stockfishchess.org/blog/2022/public-court-hearing-soon/ and
https://stockfishchess.org/blog/2021/our-lawsuit-against-chessbase/
This PR introduces a net trained with an enhanced data set and a modified loss function in the trainer.
A slight adjustment for the scaling was needed to get a pass on standard chess.
passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62c0527a49b62510394bd610
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 135008 W: 36614 L: 36152 D: 62242
Ptnml(0-2): 640, 15184, 35407, 15620, 653
passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62c17e459e7d9997a12d458e
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 28864 W: 8007 L: 7749 D: 13108
Ptnml(0-2): 47, 2810, 8466, 3056, 53
Local testing at a fixed 25k nodes resulted in
Test run1026/easy_train_data/experiments/experiment_2/training/run_0/nn-epoch799.nnue
localElo: 4.2 +- 1.6
The real strength of the net is in FRC and DFRC chess where it gains significantly.
Tested at STC with slightly different scaling:
FRC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62c13a4002ba5d0a774d20d4
Elo: 29.78 +-3.4 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 10000 W: 2007 L: 1152 D: 6841
Ptnml(0-2): 31, 686, 2804, 1355, 124
nElo: 59.24 +-6.9 (95%) PairsRatio: 2.06
DFRC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62c13a5702ba5d0a774d20d9
Elo: 55.25 +-3.9 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 10000 W: 2984 L: 1407 D: 5609
Ptnml(0-2): 51, 636, 2266, 1779, 268
nElo: 96.95 +-7.2 (95%) PairsRatio: 2.98
Tested at LTC with identical scaling:
FRC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62c26a3c9e7d9997a12d6caf
Elo: 16.20 +-2.5 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 10000 W: 1192 L: 726 D: 8082
Ptnml(0-2): 10, 403, 3727, 831, 29
nElo: 44.12 +-6.7 (95%) PairsRatio: 2.08
DFRC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/62c26a539e7d9997a12d6cb2
Elo: 40.94 +-3.0 (95%) LOS: 100.0%
Total: 10000 W: 2215 L: 1042 D: 6743
Ptnml(0-2): 10, 410, 3053, 1451, 76
nElo: 92.77 +-6.9 (95%) PairsRatio: 3.64
This is due to the mixing in a significant fraction of DFRC training data in the final training round. The net is
trained using the easy_train.py script in the following way:
```
python easy_train.py \
--training-dataset=../Leela-dfrc_n5000.binpack \
--experiment-name=2 \
--nnue-pytorch-branch=vondele/nnue-pytorch/lossScan4 \
--additional-training-arg=--param-index=2 \
--start-lambda=1.0 \
--end-lambda=0.75 \
--gamma=0.995 \
--lr=4.375e-4 \
--start-from-engine-test-net True \
--tui=False \
--seed=$RANDOM \
--max_epoch=800 \
--auto-exit-timeout-on-training-finished=900 \
--network-testing-threads 8 \
--num-workers 12
```
where the data set used (Leela-dfrc_n5000.binpack) is a combination of our previous best data set (mix of Leela and some SF data) and DFRC data, interleaved to form:
The data is available in https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1S9-ZiQa_3ApmjBtl2e8SyHxj4zG4V8gG?usp=sharing
Leela mix: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JUkMhHSfgIYCjfDNKZUMYZt6L5I7Ra6G/view?usp=sharing
DFRC: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17vDaff9LAsVo_1OfsgWAIYqJtqR8aHlm/view?usp=sharing
The training branch used is
https://github.com/vondele/nnue-pytorch/commits/lossScan4
A PR to the main trainer repo will be made later. This contains a revised loss function, now computing the loss from the score based on the win rate model, which is a more accurate representation than what we had before. Scaling constants are tweaked there as well.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4100
Bench: 5186781
This updates estimates from 2yr ago #2401, and adds missing terms.
All tests run at 10+0.1 (STC), 20000 games, error bars +- 1.8 Elo, book 8moves_v3.png.
A table of Elo values with the links to the corresponding tests can be found at the PR
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3868
Non-functional Change
Current master implements a scaling of the raw NNUE output value with a formula
equivalent to 'eval = alpha * NNUE_output', where the scale factor alpha varies
between 1.8 (for early middle game) and 0.9 (for pure endgames). This feature
allows Stockfish to keep material on the board when she thinks she has the advantage,
and to seek exchanges and simplifications when she thinks she has to defend.
This patch slightly offsets the turning point between these two strategies, by adding
to Stockfish's evaluation a small "optimism" value before actually doing the scaling.
The effect is that SF will play a little bit more risky, trying to keep the tension a
little bit longer when she is defending, and keeping even more material on the board
when she has an advantage.
We note that this patch is similar in spirit to the old "Contempt" idea we used to have
in classical Stockfish, but this implementation differs in two key points:
a) it has been tested as an Elo-gainer against master;
b) the values output by the search are not changed on average by the implementation
(in other words, the optimism value changes the tension/exchange strategy, but a
displayed value of 1.0 pawn has the same signification before and after the patch).
See the old comment https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1361#issuecomment-359165141
for some images illustrating the ideas.
-------
finished yellow at STC:
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 165048 W: 41705 L: 41611 D: 81732
Ptnml(0-2): 565, 18959, 43245, 19327, 428
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61942a3dcd645dc8291c876b
passed LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 121656 W: 30762 L: 30287 D: 60607
Ptnml(0-2): 87, 12558, 35032, 13095, 56
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61962c58cd645dc8291c8877
-------
How to continue from there?
a) the shape (slope and amplitude) of the sigmoid used to compute the optimism value
could be tweaked to try to gain more Elo, so the parameters of the sigmoid function
in line 391 of search.cpp could be tuned with SPSA. Manual tweaking is also possible
using this Desmos page: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/jhh83sqq92
b) in a similar vein, with two recents patches affecting the scaling of the NNUE
evaluation in evaluate.cpp, now could be a good time to try a round of SPSA tuning
of the NNUE network;
c) this patch will tend to keep tension in middlegame a little bit longer, so any
patch improving the defensive aspect of play via search extensions in risky,
tactical positions would be welcome.
-------
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3797
Bench: 6184852
In case the evaluation at root is large, discourage the use of lazyEval.
This fixes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/issues/3772
or at least improves it significantly. In this case, poor play with large
odds can be observed, in extreme cases leading to a loss despite large
advantage:
r1bq1b1r/ppp3p1/3p1nkp/n3p3/2B1P2N/2NPB3/PPP2PPP/R3K2R b KQ - 5 9
With this patch the poor move is only considered up to depth 13, in master
up to depth 28.
The patch did not pass at LTC with Elo gainer bounds, but with slightly
positive Elo nevertheless (95% LOS).
STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 40368 W: 10318 L: 10041 D: 20009
Ptnml(0-2): 103, 4493, 10725, 4750, 113
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61800ad259e71df00dcc420d
LTC:
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 212288 W: 52997 L: 52692 D: 106599
Ptnml(0-2): 112, 22038, 61549, 22323, 122
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/618050d959e71df00dcc426d
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3780
Bench: 7127040
combined work by Serio Vieri, Michael Byrne, and Jonathan D (aka SFisGod) based on top of previous developments, by restarts from good nets.
Sergio generated the net https://tests.stockfishchess.org/api/nn/nn-d8609abe8caf.nnue:
The initial net nn-d8609abe8caf.nnue is trained by generating around 16B of training data from the last master net nn-9e3c6298299a.nnue, then trained, continuing from the master net, with lambda=0.2 and sampling ratio of 1. Starting with LR=2e-3, dropping LR with a factor of 0.5 until it reaches LR=5e-4. in_scaling is set to 361. No other significant changes made to the pytorch trainer.
Training data gen command (generates in chunks of 200k positions):
generate_training_data min_depth 9 max_depth 11 count 200000 random_move_count 10 random_move_max_ply 80 random_multi_pv 12 random_multi_pv_diff 100 random_multi_pv_depth 8 write_min_ply 10 eval_limit 1500 book noob_3moves.epd output_file_name gendata/$(date +"%Y%m%d-%H%M")_${HOSTNAME}.binpack
PyTorch trainer command (Note that this only trains for 20 epochs, repeatedly train until convergence):
python train.py --features "HalfKAv2^" --max_epochs 20 --smart-fen-skipping --random-fen-skipping 500 --batch-size 8192 --default_root_dir $dir --seed $RANDOM --threads 4 --num-workers 32 --gpus $gpuids --track_grad_norm 2 --gradient_clip_val 0.05 --lambda 0.2 --log_every_n_steps 50 $resumeopt $data $val
See https://github.com/sergiovieri/Stockfish/tree/tools_mod/rl for the scripts used to generate data.
Based on that Michael generated nn-76a8a7ffb820.nnue in the following way:
The net being submitted was trained with the pytorch trainer: https://github.com/glinscott/nnue-pytorch
python train.py i:/bin/all.binpack i:/bin/all.binpack --gpus 1 --threads 4 --num-workers 30 --batch-size 16384 --progress_bar_refresh_rate 30 --smart-fen-skipping --random-fen-skipping 3 --features=HalfKAv2^ --auto_lr_find True --lambda=1.0 --max_epochs=240 --seed %random%%random% --default_root_dir exp/run_109 --resume-from-model ./pt/nn-d8609abe8caf.pt
This run is thus started from Segio Vieri's net nn-d8609abe8caf.nnue
all.binpack equaled 4 parts Wrong_NNUE_2.binpack https://drive.google.com/file/d/1seGNOqcVdvK_vPNq98j-zV3XPE5zWAeq/view?usp=sharing plus two parts of Training_Data.binpack https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RFkQES3DpsiJqsOtUshENtzPfFgUmEff/view?usp=sharing
Each set was concatenated together - making one large Wrong_NNUE 2 binpack and one large Training so the were approximately equal in size. They were then interleaved together. The idea was to give Wrong_NNUE.binpack closer to equal weighting with the Training_Data binpack
model.py modifications:
loss = torch.pow(torch.abs(p - q), 2.6).mean()
LR = 8.0e-5 calculated as follows: 1.5e-3*(.992^360) - the idea here was to take a highly trained net and just use all.binpack as a finishing micro refinement touch for the last 2 Elo or so. This net was discovered on the 59th epoch.
optimizer = ranger.Ranger(train_params, betas=(.90, 0.999), eps=1.0e-7, gc_loc=False, use_gc=False)
scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.StepLR(optimizer, step_size=1, gamma=0.992)
For this micro optimization, I had set the period to "5" in train.py. This changes the checkpoint output so that every 5th checkpoint file is created
The final touches were to adjust the NNUE scale, as was done by Jonathan in tests running at the same time.
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60fa45aed8a6b65b2f3a77a4
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 53040 W: 1732 L: 1575 D: 49733
Ptnml(0-2): 14, 1432, 23474, 1583, 17
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60f9fee2d8a6b65b2f3a7775
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 37928 W: 3178 L: 3001 D: 31749
Ptnml(0-2): 100, 2446, 13695, 2623, 100.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3626
Bench: 5169957
In the so-called "hybrid" method of evaluation of current master, we use the
classical eval (because of its speed) instead of the NNUE eval when the classical
material balance approximation hints that the position is "winning enough" to
rely on the classical eval.
This trade-off idea between speed and accuracy works well in general, but in
some fortress positions the classical eval is just bad. So in shuffling branches
of the search tree, we (slowly) increase the thresehold so that eventually we
don't trust classical anymore and switch to NNUE evaluation.
This patch increases that threshold faster, so that we switch to NNUE quicker
in shuffling branches. Idea is to incite Stockfish to spend less time in fortresses
lines in the search tree, and spend more time searching the critical lines.
passed STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 47872 W: 3908 L: 3720 D: 40244
Ptnml(0-2): 122, 3053, 17419, 3199, 143
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60cef34b457376eb8bcab79d
passed LTC:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 73616 W: 2326 L: 2143 D: 69147
Ptnml(0-2): 21, 1940, 32705, 2119, 23
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60cf6d842114332881e73528
Retested at LTC against lastest master:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 18264 W: 642 L: 532 D: 17090
Ptnml(0-2): 6, 479, 8055, 583, 9
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60d18cd540925195e7a6c351
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3578
Bench: 5139233
This patch removes the UCI option for setting Contempt in classical evaluation.
It is exactly equivalent to using Contempt=0 for the UCI contempt value and keeping
the dynamic part in the algo (renaming this dynamic part `trend` to better describe
what it does). We have tried quite hard to implement a working Contempt feature for
NNUE but nothing really worked, so it is probably time to give up.
Interested chess fans wishing to keep playing with the UCI option for Contempt and
use it with the classical eval are urged to download the version tagged "SF_Classical"
of Stockfish (dated 31 July 2020), as it was the last version where our search
algorithm was tuned for the classical eval and is probably our strongest classical
player ever: https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/tags
Passed STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 72904 W: 6228 L: 6175 D: 60501
Ptnml(0-2): 221, 5006, 25971, 5007, 247
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60c98bf9457376eb8bcab18d
Passed LTC:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 45168 W: 1601 L: 1547 D: 42020
Ptnml(0-2): 38, 1331, 19786, 1397, 32
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60c9c7fa457376eb8bcab1bb
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3575
Bench: 4947716
This patch increase the weight of pawns and pieces from 28 to 32
in the scaling formula we apply to the output of the NNUE pure eval.
Increasing this gradient for pawns and pieces means that Stockfish
will try a little harder to keep material when she has the advantage,
and try a little bit harder to escape into an endgame when she is
under pressure.
STC:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-0.50,2.50>
Total: 53168 W: 4371 L: 4177 D: 44620
Ptnml(0-2): 160, 3389, 19283, 3601, 151
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60cefd1d457376eb8bcab7ab
LTC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.50>
Total: 10888 W: 386 L: 288 D: 10214
Ptnml(0-2): 3, 260, 4821, 356, 4
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60cf709d2114332881e7352b
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3571
Bench: 4965430
