Note that in value we leave two specialized functions
to allow adding an integer, we don't want to add this
as a template becasue we want to control implicit
conversions to integer of an enum.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is tricky because there are some special
binary fnctions with SquareDelta that we should
leave as they are.
Also note that we needed to add Unary minus template
to fix a comile error in SERIALIZE_MOVES_D macro that was
triggered because now we don't allow conversion to int.
No fuctional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Doing the conversion the compiler is now able to
spot two possible ambiguity calls that now we can
easily fix.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
When depth < DEPTH_ZERO we store with the same depth all
the positions, use -OnePly instead of -1 for consistency
with depth arithmetic.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
There is no reason to use a variable for this.
Also remove unused DEPTH_ZERO and DEPTH_MAX.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Regression test found the patches to be harmless,
so revert to keep code simpler.
Test1 at 20+0.1: (2500 - 3000) +0 ELO
Test2 at 1+0: (~1000) +2 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
There is a functional change because we now skip
more moves and because do_move() / undo_move() is
well known to be not reversible we end up with a
change in node count, although there is actually
no change but a bit speed up.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
To be uniform across the sources. As a nice side effect
I quickly spotted a couple of needed renames:
captured_piece() -> captured_piece_type()
st->capture -> st->capturedType
Proposed by Ralph and done with QtCreator
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In root_search() we can compute depth at the beginning
once and for all.
Spotted by Ralph Stoesser.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We don't need to generate captures and non
captures in a separate step. This gives another
7% push to perft speed.
yes, I know, it is totally useless :-)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We can now set member data as private because is no more
directly accessed.
Should be more clear now.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Move OptimumSearchTime, MaximumSearchTime and
ExtraSearchTime in TimeManager.
Note that we remove an useless initialization to 0 because
these variables are used only with time management.
Also introduce and use TimeManager::available_time()
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Firt step in unifying all time management under
a single umbrella. Just introduced the class without
even member data.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After razoring, IID, null verification and singular
extension searches we have could have a dirty ss->bestMove,
restore to MOVE_NONE before to enter moves loop.
This should avoid to store in TT a stale move when
we fail low.
Tested together with previous patch that is the
one that gives ELO.
After 1152 games at 1+0 on my QUAD
Mod vs Orig +233 =716 -203 (+9 ELO)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
If singular extension search was succesful in the past then
skip another the SE search and extend of one ply.
Another way to mitigate the cost of SE at the price of
some more spurious extension, but on 90% of cases info
is correct.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Renamed in OptimumSearchTime and MaximumSearchTime,
should be more clear now.
Suggested by Joona.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
I created three different systems, tested them all separately and
attached one did best:
1/40: Orig - Mod: 841 - 850 (+2 elo)
1+1 : Orig - Mod: 474 - 498 (+9 elo)
1+0 : Orig - Mod: 455 - 495 (+15 elo)
Because such testing system is not statistically reliable, I made a
confirmation test:
1/40: Orig - Mod: 502 - 543 (+14 elo)
1+1: Orig - Mod: 447 - 489 (+16 elo)
1+0: Orig - Mod: 641 - 656 (+4 elo)
All tests show positive score :-)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Instead of ss->currentMove. It is more consistent and
clear to understand.
Remark by Ralph Stoesser.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
To compensate for the extra work skip singular
searches deemed to fail because excluded node
failed high already in the past.
After 1200 games at 1+0
Mod vs Orig +387 =1274 -339 (+8 ELO)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
The one in evaluate_passed_pawns() is just a micro
optimization, the other in evaluate_unstoppable_pawns()
is indeed a fix, although almost unmeasurable in real
games.
Bugs report and fixes by Marek Kwiatkowski
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Broken by recent patch. Also better document what's
happening there.
Verified to restore original behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Square and piece colors are two different things,
so use different types to avoid misunderstandings.
Suggested by Tord.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Less invasive then previous patches, but still a good
enhancement.
Also some indulge on STL algorithms :-)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Complete rewrite the function and extend compatibility
also to X-FEN notation for Chess960.
We are now able to read standard FEN, Shredder-FEN and X-FEN.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After 'Randomness' is retired, this is no longer necessary.
NOTE: Possibly some extra care is needed when tuning branch is synced
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Using multiple threads and good opening book is
much better and more reliable source of randomness than
spoiling psqt-tables
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Let be explicit about what this functions do, and
we save some code lines too.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After we set ss->threatMove we could go under a IID step that
resets SearchStack ss and so also ss->threatMove.
When later we use that field in futility pruning we have this
set to MOVE_NONE !
The fix is to use a local variable and add threatMove to SplitPoint
to pass this move to slaves.
Spotted by Ralph Stoesser, fix suggested by Richard Vida.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Improvement is easily in error bar and there is
some added complexity making future changes more
difficult.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Because not all backward pawns are the same ;-) if the
blocking enemy pawn is near then our pawn is more backward
than another whose enemy pawn is far away so that can advance
for some sqaures.
After 2925 games at 30"+0 on my QUAD
Mod vs Orig +602 =1745 -578 +3 ELO
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
