Let be explicit about what this functions do, and
we save some code lines too.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After we set ss->threatMove we could go under a IID step that
resets SearchStack ss and so also ss->threatMove.
When later we use that field in futility pruning we have this
set to MOVE_NONE !
The fix is to use a local variable and add threatMove to SplitPoint
to pass this move to slaves.
Spotted by Ralph Stoesser, fix suggested by Richard Vida.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
KILLER_MAX in search.h is quite pointless, because
we already hardcode this to 2 in MovePicker anyway.
By hard-coding this to 2 we can keep code simpler.
No functional change
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We don't need to pass side_to_move because we can get
it directly from the position object.
Note that in benchmark we always used to pass '0' and
it was a bug, but with no effect because was used only
in time[] and increment[], set always to 0 for both
colors.
Also additional small cleanup while there.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Extract PV info from TT instead of using
a set of arrays. This is almost equivalent
except for cases when TT is full and the PV entry
is overwritten, but this is very rare.
(Almost) No functional change
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Also renamed allowNullmove in skipNullMove to reverse
the logic so that the field is initialized to 0 (false)
instead of 1 (true).
No functional change also with faked split.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is an hidden bug waiting to fire. The main problem is
that ss[ply] is overwritten by search() and qsearch() called
from IID and razoring, so that we cannot hold a pointer to a
local EvalInfo variable.
For instance if we go razoring then we overwrite the pointer
with the address of a variable local to qsearch(), when we return
from qsearch() variable goes out of scope and now ss[ply].evalInfo
holds a stale pointer !
Because we are not looking for troubles we go through the
safe route and we remove it entirely.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This will allow to have wider access to attack
information, for instance from MovePicker.
Note that 'eval' field become obsolete, it is kept
just becasue when we get a position score from TT
we update 'eval' even without an EvalInfo object.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Patch from Joona with extension to benchmark and inclusion
of Depth(0) moves generation by me.
Note that to test also qsearch and in particulary checks
generations a change in the end condition is needed.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
In case we reach ply == PLY_MAX we exit the function
writing
pv[PLY_MAX] = MOVE_NONE;
And because SearchStack is defined as:
struct SearchStack {
Move pv[PLY_MAX];
Move currentMove;
.....
We end up with the unwanted assignment
SearchStack.currentMove = MOVE_NONE;
Fortunatly this is harmless because currentMove is not used where
extarct_pv() is called. But neverthless this is a bug that
needs to be fixed.
Thanks to Uri Blass for spotting out this.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This is a first step for future patches and in
any case seems a nice thing to do.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Centralize in a single object all the global resources
management and avoid a bunch of sparse exit() calls.
This is more reliable and clean and more stick to C++ coding
practices.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Add infrastructure to threat killer moves as a vector,
this will allow us to easily parametrize the number of
killer moves, instead of hardcode this value to two as is now.
This patch just add the infrastructure, no functional
change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This patch modifies think() signature to accept
also opponent time. This is needed for future
changes to time managment.
Still no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
