Patch and tuning by Gary Linscott from an idea of Ryan Taker.
Double tested by Gary:
Wins: 3390 Losses: 2972 Draws: 11323
LOS: 99.999992%
ELO: 8.213465 +- 99%: 6.746506 95%: 5.124415
Win%: 51.181792 +- 99%: 0.969791 95%: 0.736740
And by me:
After 5612 games 1255 1085 3271 +11 ELO
It seems more accurate: lsb is clear while 'first
bit' depends from where you look at the bitboard.
And fix compile in case of 64 bits platforms that
do not use BSFQ intrinsics.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Let first argument to be the 'color'. This allows to align
pos.pieces() signatures with piece_list(), piece_count() and
all the other functions where 'color' argument is passed as
first one.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Hex representation doesn't add any value in those cases.
Preserve hex representation where more self-documenting
for instance for binary masks values.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is more correct given what the function does. In
particular single_bit() returns true also in case of
empty bitboards.
Of course also the usual renaming while there :-)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Apart from the semplification it is now more clear that
the actual Tempo added was half of the indicated score.
This is becuase at start compute_psq_score() added half
Tempo unit and in do_move() white/black were respectively
adding/subtracting one Tempo unit.
Now we have directly halved Tempo constant and everything
is more clear.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After extensive test Gary says:
"So, after 16k games at 10"+1" on an i7, the undefended rook test
looks to be not good (albeit by a very small margin).
3063 - 3093 - 9844 (-1).
I doubt that is causing the regression, but even so, it looks like
it's not worth keeping, and we can go back to the simpler undefended
minors check."
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Unfortunatly accessing thread local variable
is much slower than object data (see previous
patch log msg), so we have to revert to old code
to avoid speed regression.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Much faster then pthread_getspecific() but still a
speed regression against the original code.
Following are the nps on a bench:
Position
454165
454838
455433
tls
441046
442767
442767
ms (Win)
450521
447510
451105
ms (pthread)
422115
422115
424276
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
But use the newly introduced local storage
for this. A good code semplification and also
the correct way to go.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Renamed stuff and added comments. The aim is to make more
readable, at least by me ;-) , this newly added part of code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Penalty for undefended rook
Almost no change at longer TC, but perhaps there
is a tiny increase....
After 17522 games at 10"+0.05
Mod vs Orig 3064 - 2967 - 11491 ELO +2
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We store pointers instead of Thread objects because
Thread is not copy-constructible nor copy-assignable
and default ones are not suitable. So we cannot store
directly in a std::vector.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Even if not under attack. This seems to be good
especially on openings.
After 12112 games at 10"+0.05
Mod vs Orig 2175 - 1997 - 7940 ELO +5 (+- 3.7)
[Patch series from Gary, little edited by me]
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Also some microoptimizations, were there from ages
but hidden: the renaming suddendly made them visible!
This is a good example of how better naming lets you write
better code. Naming is really a kind of black art!
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Fine tune newly introduced pinner bonus score:
After 34696 games at 2"+0.05
Mod vs Orig 7474 - 7087 - 20135 ELO +3 (+- 2.4)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
So to be done only once at startup and in the (unlikely)
cases that a relevant UCI parameter is changed, instead
of doing it at the beginning of each search.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Self-documenting code instead of a tricky
bitwise tweak, not known by everybody.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Add a bonus if a slider is pinning an enemy piece.
Idea from Critter.
After 27443 games at 2"+0.05
Mod vs Orig 5900 - 5518 - 16025 ELO +4 (+- 2.7)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
This allows to retire ClearMaskBB[] and use just
one SquareBB[] array to set and clear a bit.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is more correct and specific. Another naming
improvement while reading Critter sources.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Now that HasPopCnt is a compile time constant we can
centralize and unify the BitCountType selection.
Also rename count_1s() in the more standard popcount()
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It was meant to build a single binary optimized
for any kind of CPU: with and without hardware POPCNT.
This is a nice idea but in practice was never used, or
people builds binary with popcnt enabled or not, mainly
according to their type of CPU. And it was also never
used in the official Jim's builds where, in case, would
be easier for a number of reasons, do build two different
versions: with and without SEE42 support.
So retire this feature and simplify the code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Greatly improves the usage. User defined conversions
are a novelity for SF, another amazing C++ facility
at work !
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Follow the suggested Qt style:
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/qq/qq13-apis.html
It seems to me simpler and easier to read.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Tuned with CLOP against a pool of 3 engines. Result
verified with a direct match:
After 11720 games at 10"+0.1
Mod vs Orig 1922 - 1832 - 7966 ELO +2 (+-3.6)
So no change in self match but if CLOP is right it should
be a bit better against an engine pool.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Remove the bonus for no *friendly* pieces in the pawn's path and
reduce a bit the bonus based on kings proximity.
This patch is part of to the ongoing effort to remove form evaluation
all the terms that do not add value.
After 16284 games:
Mod vs Orig 2728 - 2651 - 10911 ELO +1 (+- 3.1)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
First tuning with CLOP against a pool of 3 engines. Result
verified with a direct match:
After 8736 games at 10"+0.1
Mod vs Orig 1470 - 1496 - 5770 ELO -1 (+-4.3)
So no change in self match but if CLOP is right it should
be a bit better against an engine pool.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
