Previously, we had two type aliases, LargePagePtr and AlignedPtr, which
required manually initializing the aligned memory for the pointer.
The new helpers:
- make_unique_aligned
- make_unique_large_page
are now available for allocating aligned memory (with large pages). They
behave similarly to std::make_unique, ensuring objects allocated with
these functions follow RAII.
The old approach had issues with initializing non-trivial types or
arrays of objects. The evaluation function of the network is now a
unique pointer to an array instead of an array of unique pointers.
Memory related functions have been moved into memory.h
Passed High Hash Pressure Test Non-Regression STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/665b2b36586058766677cfd2
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 476992 W: 122426 L: 122677 D: 231889
Ptnml(0-2): 1145, 51027, 134419, 50744, 1161
Failed Normal Non-Regression STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/665b2997586058766677cfc8
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 877312 W: 225233 L: 226395 D: 425684
Ptnml(0-2): 2110, 94642, 246239, 93630, 2035
Probably a fluke since there shouldn't be a real slowndown and it has also
passed the high hash pressure test.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/5332
No functional change
Allow for NUMA memory replication for NNUE weights. Bind threads to ensure execution on a specific NUMA node.
This patch introduces NUMA memory replication, currently only utilized for the NNUE weights. Along with it comes all machinery required to identify NUMA nodes and bind threads to specific processors/nodes. It also comes with small changes to Thread and ThreadPool to allow easier execution of custom functions on the designated thread. Old thread binding (WinProcGroup) machinery is removed because it's incompatible with this patch. Small changes to unrelated parts of the code were made to ensure correctness, like some classes being made unmovable, raw pointers replaced with unique_ptr. etc.
Windows 7 and Windows 10 is partially supported. Windows 11 is fully supported. Linux is fully supported, with explicit exclusion of Android. No additional dependencies.
-----------------
A new UCI option `NumaPolicy` is introduced. It can take the following values:
```
system - gathers NUMA node information from the system (lscpu or windows api), for each threads binds it to a single NUMA node
none - assumes there is 1 NUMA node, never binds threads
auto - this is the default value, depends on the number of set threads and NUMA nodes, will only enable binding on multinode systems and when the number of threads reaches a threshold (dependent on node size and count)
[[custom]] -
// ':'-separated numa nodes
// ','-separated cpu indices
// supports "first-last" range syntax for cpu indices,
for example '0-15,32-47:16-31,48-63'
```
Setting `NumaPolicy` forces recreation of the threads in the ThreadPool, which in turn forces the recreation of the TT.
The threads are distributed among NUMA nodes in a round-robin fashion based on fill percentage (i.e. it will strive to fill all NUMA nodes evenly). Threads are bound to NUMA nodes, not specific processors, because that's our only requirement and the OS can schedule them better.
Special care is made that maximum memory usage on systems that do not require memory replication stays as previously, that is, unnecessary copies are avoided.
On linux the process' processor affinity is respected. This means that if you for example use taskset to restrict Stockfish to a single NUMA node then the `system` and `auto` settings will only see a single NUMA node (more precisely, the processors included in the current affinity mask) and act accordingly.
-----------------
We can't ensure that a memory allocation takes place on a given NUMA node without using libnuma on linux, or using appropriate custom allocators on windows (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/memory/allocating-memory-from-a-numa-node), so to avoid complications the current implementation relies on first-touch policy. Due to this we also rely on the memory allocator to give us a new chunk of untouched memory from the system. This appears to work reliably on linux, but results may vary.
MacOS is not supported, because AFAIK it's not affected, and implementation would be problematic anyway.
Windows is supported since Windows 7 (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/processtopologyapi/nf-processtopologyapi-setthreadgroupaffinity). Until Windows 11/Server 2022 NUMA nodes are split such that they cannot span processor groups. This is because before Windows 11/Server 2022 it's not possible to set thread affinity spanning processor groups. The splitting is done manually in some cases (required after Windows 10 Build 20348). Since Windows 11/Server 2022 we can set affinites spanning processor group so this splitting is not done, so the behaviour is pretty much like on linux.
Linux is supported, **without** libnuma requirement. `lscpu` is expected.
-----------------
Passed 60+1 @ 256t 16000MB hash: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6654e443a86388d5e27db0d8
```
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,10.00>
Total: 278 W: 110 L: 29 D: 139
Ptnml(0-2): 0, 1, 56, 82, 0
```
Passed SMP STC: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6654fc74a86388d5e27db1cd
```
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 67152 W: 17354 L: 17177 D: 32621
Ptnml(0-2): 64, 7428, 18408, 7619, 57
```
Passed STC: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6654fb27a86388d5e27db15c
```
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 131648 W: 34155 L: 34045 D: 63448
Ptnml(0-2): 426, 13878, 37096, 14008, 416
```
fixes#5253
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/5285
No functional change
Part 2 of the Split UCI into UCIEngine and Engine refactor.
This creates function callbacks for search to use when an update should occur.
The benching in uci.cpp for example does this to extract the total nodes
searched.
No functional change
- fix naming convention for `workingDirectory`
- use type alias for `EvalFiles` everywhere
- move `ponderMode` into `LimitsType`
- move limits parsing into standalone static function
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/5098
No functional change
This addresses the issue where Stockfish may output non-proven checkmate
scores if the search is prematurely halted, either due to a time control
or node limit, before it explores other possibilities where the
checkmate score could have been delayed or refuted.
The fix also replaces staving off from proven mated scores in a
multithread environment making use of the threads instead of a negative
effect with multithreads (1t was better in proving mated in scores than
more threads).
Issue reported on mate tracker repo by and this PR is co-authored with
@robertnurnberg Special thanks to @AndyGrant for outlining that a fix is
eventually possible.
Passed Adj off SMP STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65a125d779aa8af82b96c3eb
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 303256 W: 75823 L: 75892 D: 151541
Ptnml(0-2): 406, 35269, 80395, 35104, 454
Passed Adj off SMP LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65a37add79aa8af82b96f0f7
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 56056 W: 13951 L: 13770 D: 28335
Ptnml(0-2): 11, 5910, 16002, 6097, 8
Passed all tests in matetrack without any better mate for opponent found in 1t and multithreads.
Fixed bugs in https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4976
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4990
Bench: 1308279
Co-Authored-By: Robert Nürnberg <28635489+robertnurnberg@users.noreply.github.com>
This aims to remove some of the annoying global structure which Stockfish has.
Overall there is no major elo regression to be expected.
Non regression SMP STC (paused, early version):
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65983d7979aa8af82b9608f1
LLR: 0.23 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 76232 W: 19035 L: 19096 D: 38101
Ptnml(0-2): 92, 8735, 20515, 8690, 84
Non regression STC (early version):
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6595b3a479aa8af82b95da7f
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 185344 W: 47027 L: 46972 D: 91345
Ptnml(0-2): 571, 21285, 48943, 21264, 609
Non regression SMP STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65a0715c79aa8af82b96b7e4
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 142936 W: 35761 L: 35662 D: 71513
Ptnml(0-2): 209, 16400, 38135, 16531, 193
These global structures/variables add hidden dependencies and allow data
to be mutable from where it shouldn't it be (i.e. options). They also
prevent Stockfish from internal selfplay, which would be a nice thing to
be able to do, i.e. instantiate two Stockfish instances and let them
play against each other. It will also allow us to make Stockfish a
library, which can be easier used on other platforms.
For consistency with the old search code, `thisThread` has been kept,
even though it is not strictly necessary anymore. This the first major
refactor of this kind (in recent time), and future changes are required,
to achieve the previously described goals. This includes cleaning up the
dependencies, transforming the network to be self contained and coming
up with a plan to deal with proper tablebase memory management (see
comments for more information on this).
The removal of these global structures has been discussed in parts with
Vondele and Sopel.
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4968
No functional change
The primary rationale behind this lies in the fact that enums were not
originally designed to be employed in the manner we currently utilize them.
The Value enum was used like a type alias throughout the code and was often
misused. Furthermore, changing the underlying size of the enum to int16_t broke
everything, mostly because of the operator overloads for the Value enum, were
causing data to be truncated. Since Value is now a type alias, the operator
overloads are no longer required.
Passed Non-Regression STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6593b8bb79aa8af82b95b401
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 235296 W: 59919 L: 59917 D: 115460
Ptnml(0-2): 743, 27085, 62054, 26959, 807
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4960
No functional change
Idea from Caissa (https://github.com/Witek902/Caissa) chess engine.
With given pawn structure collect data with how often search result and by how
much it was better / worse than static evalution of position and use it to
adjust static evaluation of positions with given pawn structure. Details:
1. excludes positions with fail highs and moves producing it being a capture;
2. update value is function of not only difference between best value and static
evaluation but also is multiplied by linear function of depth;
3. maximum update value is maximum value of correction history divided by 2;
4. correction history itself is divided by 32 when applied so maximum value of
static evaluation adjustment is 32 internal units.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/658fc7b679aa8af82b955cac
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 128672 W: 32757 L: 32299 D: 63616
Ptnml(0-2): 441, 15241, 32543, 15641, 470
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65903f6979aa8af82b9566f1
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 97422 W: 24626 L: 24178 D: 48618
Ptnml(0-2): 41, 10837, 26527, 11245, 61
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4950
Bench: 1157852
Original idea by Seer chess engine https://github.com/connormcmonigle/seer-nnue,
coding done by @Disservin, code refactoring done by @locutus2 to match the style
of other histories.
This patch introduces pawn structure based history, which assings moves values
based on last digits of pawn structure hash and piece type of moved piece and
landing square of the move. Idea is that good places for pieces are quite often
determined by pawn structure of position. Used in 3 different places
- sorting of quiet moves, sorting of quiet check evasions and in history based
pruning in search.
Passed STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/65391d08cc309ae83955dbaf
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 155488 W: 39408 L: 38913 D: 77167
Ptnml(0-2): 500, 18427, 39408, 18896, 513
Passed LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/653a36a2cc309ae83955f181
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 70110 W: 17548 L: 17155 D: 35407
Ptnml(0-2): 33, 7859, 18889, 8230, 44
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4849
Bench: 1257882
Co-Authored-By: Disservin <disservin.social@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Stefan Geschwentner <locutus2@users.noreply.github.com>
- remove the blank line between the declaration of the function and it's
comment, leads to better IDE support when hovering over a function to see it's
description
- remove the unnecessary duplication of the function name in the functions
description
- slightly refactored code for lsb, msb in bitboard.h There are still a few
things we can be improved later on, move the description of a function where
it was declared (instead of implemented) and add descriptions to functions
which are behind macros ifdefs
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4840
No functional change
This introduces clang-format to enforce a consistent code style for Stockfish.
Having a documented and consistent style across the code will make contributing easier
for new developers, and will make larger changes to the codebase easier to make.
To facilitate formatting, this PR includes a Makefile target (`make format`) to format the code,
this requires clang-format (version 17 currently) to be installed locally.
Installing clang-format is straightforward on most OS and distros
(e.g. with https://apt.llvm.org/, brew install clang-format, etc), as this is part of quite commonly
used suite of tools and compilers (llvm / clang).
Additionally, a CI action is present that will verify if the code requires formatting,
and comment on the PR as needed. Initially, correct formatting is not required, it will be
done by maintainers as part of the merge or in later commits, but obviously this is encouraged.
fixes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/issues/3608
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4790
Co-Authored-By: Joost VandeVondele <Joost.VandeVondele@gmail.com>
This patch implements the pure materialistic evaluation called simple_eval()
to gain a speed-up during Stockfish search.
We use the so-called lazy evaluation trick: replace the accurate but slow
NNUE network evaluation by the super-fast simple_eval() if the position
seems to be already won (high material advantage). To guard against some
of the most obvious blunders introduced by this idea, this patch uses the
following features which will raise the lazy evaluation threshold in some
situations:
- avoid lazy evals on shuffling branches in the search tree
- avoid lazy evals if the position at root already has a material imbalance
- avoid lazy evals if the search value at root is already winning/losing.
Moreover, we add a small random noise to the simple_eval() term. This idea
(stochastic mobility in the minimax tree) was worth about 200 Elo in the pure
simple_eval() player on Lichess.
Overall, the current implementation in this patch evaluates about 2% of the
leaves in the search tree lazily.
--------------------------------------------
STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.00>
Total: 60352 W: 15585 L: 15234 D: 29533
Ptnml(0-2): 216, 6906, 15578, 7263, 213
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/64f1d9bcbd9967ffae366209
LTC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 35106 W: 8990 L: 8678 D: 17438
Ptnml(0-2): 14, 3668, 9887, 3960, 24
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/64f25204f5b0c54e3f04c0e7
verification run at VLTC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,2.50>
Total: 74362 W: 19088 L: 18716 D: 36558
Ptnml(0-2): 6, 7226, 22348, 7592, 9
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/64f2ecdbf5b0c54e3f04d3ae
All three tests above were run with adjudication off, we also verified that
there was no regression on matetracker (thanks Disservin!).
----------------------------------------------
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4771
Bench: 1393714
since the introduction of NNUE (first released with Stockfish 12), we
have maintained the classical evaluation as part of SF in frozen form.
The idea that this code could lead to further inputs to the NN or
search did not materialize. Now, after five releases, this PR removes
the classical evaluation from SF. Even though this evaluation is
probably the best of its class, it has become unimportant for the
engine's strength, and there is little need to maintain this
code (roughly 25% of SF) going forward, or to expend resources on
trying to improve its integration in the NNUE eval.
Indeed, it had still a very limited use in the current SF, namely
for the evaluation of positions that are nearly decided based on
material difference, where the speed of the classical evaluation
outweights its inaccuracies. This impact on strength is small,
roughly 2Elo, and probably decreasing in importance as the TC grows.
Potentially, removal of this code could lead to the development of
techniques to have faster, but less accurate NN evaluation,
for certain positions.
STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/64a320173ee09aa549c52157
Elo: -2.35 ± 1.1 (95%) LOS: 0.0%
Total: 100000 W: 24916 L: 25592 D: 49492
Ptnml(0-2): 287, 12123, 25841, 11477, 272
nElo: -4.62 ± 2.2 (95%) PairsRatio: 0.95
LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/64a320293ee09aa549c5215b
Elo: -1.74 ± 1.0 (95%) LOS: 0.0%
Total: 100000 W: 25010 L: 25512 D: 49478
Ptnml(0-2): 44, 11069, 28270, 10579, 38
nElo: -3.72 ± 2.2 (95%) PairsRatio: 0.96
VLTC SMP
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/64a3207c3ee09aa549c52168
Elo: -1.70 ± 0.9 (95%) LOS: 0.0%
Total: 100000 W: 25673 L: 26162 D: 48165
Ptnml(0-2): 8, 9455, 31569, 8954, 14
nElo: -3.95 ± 2.2 (95%) PairsRatio: 0.95
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4674
Bench: 1444646
Beyond the simplification, this could be considered a bugfix from a certain point of view.
However, the effect is very subtle and essentially impossible for users to notice.
5372f81cc8 added about 2 Elo at LTC, but only for second and later `go` commands; now, with
this patch, the first `go` command will also benefit from that gain. Games under time
controls are unaffected (as per the tests).
STC: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/63c3d291330c0d3d051d48a8
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 473792 W: 124858 L: 125104 D: 223830
Ptnml(0-2): 1338, 49653, 135063, 49601, 1241
LTC: https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/63c8cd56a83c702aac083bc9
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 290728 W: 76926 L: 76978 D: 136824
Ptnml(0-2): 106, 27987, 89221, 27953, 97
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4361
bench 4208265
Removed sprintf() which generated a warning, because of security reasons.
Replace NULL with nullptr
Replace typedef with using
Do not inherit from std::vector. Use composition instead.
optimize mutex-unlocking
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/4327
No functional change
Current master implements a scaling of the raw NNUE output value with a formula
equivalent to 'eval = alpha * NNUE_output', where the scale factor alpha varies
between 1.8 (for early middle game) and 0.9 (for pure endgames). This feature
allows Stockfish to keep material on the board when she thinks she has the advantage,
and to seek exchanges and simplifications when she thinks she has to defend.
This patch slightly offsets the turning point between these two strategies, by adding
to Stockfish's evaluation a small "optimism" value before actually doing the scaling.
The effect is that SF will play a little bit more risky, trying to keep the tension a
little bit longer when she is defending, and keeping even more material on the board
when she has an advantage.
We note that this patch is similar in spirit to the old "Contempt" idea we used to have
in classical Stockfish, but this implementation differs in two key points:
a) it has been tested as an Elo-gainer against master;
b) the values output by the search are not changed on average by the implementation
(in other words, the optimism value changes the tension/exchange strategy, but a
displayed value of 1.0 pawn has the same signification before and after the patch).
See the old comment https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/1361#issuecomment-359165141
for some images illustrating the ideas.
-------
finished yellow at STC:
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 165048 W: 41705 L: 41611 D: 81732
Ptnml(0-2): 565, 18959, 43245, 19327, 428
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61942a3dcd645dc8291c876b
passed LTC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 121656 W: 30762 L: 30287 D: 60607
Ptnml(0-2): 87, 12558, 35032, 13095, 56
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61962c58cd645dc8291c8877
-------
How to continue from there?
a) the shape (slope and amplitude) of the sigmoid used to compute the optimism value
could be tweaked to try to gain more Elo, so the parameters of the sigmoid function
in line 391 of search.cpp could be tuned with SPSA. Manual tweaking is also possible
using this Desmos page: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/jhh83sqq92
b) in a similar vein, with two recents patches affecting the scaling of the NNUE
evaluation in evaluate.cpp, now could be a good time to try a round of SPSA tuning
of the NNUE network;
c) this patch will tend to keep tension in middlegame a little bit longer, so any
patch improving the defensive aspect of play via search extensions in risky,
tactical positions would be welcome.
-------
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3797
Bench: 6184852
In case the evaluation at root is large, discourage the use of lazyEval.
This fixes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/issues/3772
or at least improves it significantly. In this case, poor play with large
odds can be observed, in extreme cases leading to a loss despite large
advantage:
r1bq1b1r/ppp3p1/3p1nkp/n3p3/2B1P2N/2NPB3/PPP2PPP/R3K2R b KQ - 5 9
With this patch the poor move is only considered up to depth 13, in master
up to depth 28.
The patch did not pass at LTC with Elo gainer bounds, but with slightly
positive Elo nevertheless (95% LOS).
STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.00,2.50>
Total: 40368 W: 10318 L: 10041 D: 20009
Ptnml(0-2): 103, 4493, 10725, 4750, 113
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/61800ad259e71df00dcc420d
LTC:
LLR: -2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <0.50,3.00>
Total: 212288 W: 52997 L: 52692 D: 106599
Ptnml(0-2): 112, 22038, 61549, 22323, 122
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/618050d959e71df00dcc426d
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3780
Bench: 7127040
This patch detects some search explosions (due to double extensions in
search.cpp) which can happen in some pathological positions, and takes
measures to ensure progress in search even for these pathological situations.
While a small number of double extensions can be useful during search
(for example to resolve a tactical sequence), a sustained regime of
double extensions leads to search explosion and a non-finishing search.
See the discussion in https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3544
and the issue https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/issues/3532 .
The implemented algorithm is the following:
a) at each node during search, store the current depth in the stack.
Double extensions are by definition levels of the stack where the
depth at ply N is strictly higher than depth at ply N-1.
b) during search, calculate for each thread a running average of the
number of double extensions in the last 4096 visited nodes.
c) if one thread has more than 2% of double extensions for a sustained
period of time (6 millions consecutive nodes, or about 4 seconds on
my iMac), we decide that this thread is in an explosion state and
we calm down this thread by preventing it to do any double extension
for the next 6 millions nodes.
To calculate the running averages, we also introduced a auxiliary class
generalizing the computations of ttHitAverage variable we already had in
code. The implementation uses an exponential moving average of period 4096
and resolution 1/1024, and all computations are done with integers for
efficiency.
-----------
Example where the patch solves a search explosion:
```
./stockfish
ucinewgame
position fen 8/Pk6/8/1p6/8/P1K5/8/6B1 w - - 37 130
go infinite
```
This algorithm does not affect search in normal, non-pathological positions.
We verified, for instance, that the usual bench is unchanged up to depth 20
at least, and that the node numbers are unchanged for a search of the starting
position at depth 32.
-------------
See https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3714
Bench: 5575265
This patch removes the UCI option for setting Contempt in classical evaluation.
It is exactly equivalent to using Contempt=0 for the UCI contempt value and keeping
the dynamic part in the algo (renaming this dynamic part `trend` to better describe
what it does). We have tried quite hard to implement a working Contempt feature for
NNUE but nothing really worked, so it is probably time to give up.
Interested chess fans wishing to keep playing with the UCI option for Contempt and
use it with the classical eval are urged to download the version tagged "SF_Classical"
of Stockfish (dated 31 July 2020), as it was the last version where our search
algorithm was tuned for the classical eval and is probably our strongest classical
player ever: https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/tags
Passed STC:
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 72904 W: 6228 L: 6175 D: 60501
Ptnml(0-2): 221, 5006, 25971, 5007, 247
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60c98bf9457376eb8bcab18d
Passed LTC:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-2.50,0.50>
Total: 45168 W: 1601 L: 1547 D: 42020
Ptnml(0-2): 38, 1331, 19786, 1397, 32
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/60c9c7fa457376eb8bcab1bb
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3575
Bench: 4947716
- Comment for Countemove pruning -> Continuation history
- Fix comment in input_slice.h
- Shorter lines in Makefile
- Comment for scale factor
- Fix comment for pinners in see_ge()
- Change Thread.id() signature to size_t
- Trailing space in reprosearch.sh
- Add Douglas Matos Gomes to the AUTHORS file
- Introduce comment for undo_null_move()
- Use Stockfish coding style for export_net()
- Change date in AUTHORS file
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3416
No functional change
The idea of this patch can be described as following: we update static
history stats based on comparison of the static evaluations of the
position before and after the move. If the move increases static evaluation
it's assigned positive bonus, if it decreases static evaluation
it's assigned negative bonus. These stats are used in movepicker
to sort quiet moves.
passed STC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fca4c0842a050a89f02cd66
LLR: 3.00 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 78152 W: 7409 L: 7171 D: 63572
Ptnml(0-2): 303, 5695, 26873, 5871, 334
passed LTC
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5fca6be442a050a89f02cd75
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 40240 W: 1602 L: 1441 D: 37197
Ptnml(0-2): 19, 1306, 17305, 1475, 15
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3253
bench 3845156
Idea of this patch can be described as following - in case we have consecutive fail highs and we reach late enough moves at root node probability of remaining quiet moves being able to produce even bigger value than moves that produced previous cutoff (so ones that should be high in move ordering but now they fail to produce beta cutoff because we actually reached high move count) should be quiet small so we can reduce them more.
passed STC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25}
Total: 53392 W: 5681 L: 5474 D: 42237
Ptnml(0-2): 214, 4104, 17894, 4229, 255
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f88501adcdad978fe8c527e
passed LTC
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25}
Total: 59136 W: 2773 L: 2564 D: 53799
Ptnml(0-2): 30, 2117, 25078, 2300, 43
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f884dbfdcdad978fe8c527a
closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3184
Bench: 4066972
