Simplify the code and doing this introduce a couple
of (very small) functional changes:
- Always compare to depth even in "mate value" condition
- TT cut-off in qsearch also in case of PvNode, as in search
Verified against regression with 2500 games at 30"+0.05
on 2 threads: 451 - 444 - 1602
Functional changed: new bench is 5544977
As Joona says: "The problem is that when doing full
window search (-VALUE_INFINITE, VALUE_INFINITE), and
pruning all the moves will return fail low which is
mate score, because only clause touching alpha is
"mate distance pruning". So we are returning mate score
although we are just pruning all the moves. In reality
there probably is no mate in sight.
Bug spotted and fixed by Joona.
Port to qsearch() the same changes we recently
added to search().
Overall this search refactoring series shows
almost 2% speed up on gcc compile.
No functional change.
First disable Contempt Factor during analysis, then
calculate the modified draw score from the point of
view of the player, so from the point of view of
RootPosition color.
Thanks to Ryan Taker for suggesting the fixes.
No functional change.
A simplification and also a small speed-up of
about 1% mainly due to reducing calls to
thisThread->cutoff_occurred().
Worst case split point recovering time after a
cut-off occurred is limited to 3 msec on my slow
PC, and usually is below 1 msec, so it seems safe
to remove the cutoff_occurred() check.
No functional change.
This is very crude and very basic: simply in case
of a draw for repetition or 50 moves rule return
a negative score instead of zero according to the
contempt factor (in centipawns). If contempt is
positive engine will try to avoid draws (to use
with weaker opponents), if negative engine will
try to draw. If zero (default) there are no changes.
No functional change.
Use a value related to PawnValue instead.
This is a different patch from previous one because
could affect game play and skill levels, although
in a mostly unmeasurable way. Indeed thresold has
been raised so easy move is a bit harder to trigger
and skill level is a bit more prone to blunders.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Show the real value in the code, not hide it
behind a variable name, especially when there
is only once occurence.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Extend for an extra half-ply in case the node is (probably)
going to fail high. In this case the added overhead is limited.
A novelity is the way this patch has been tested: Always in
self-play but with a much longer TC to allow the singular
extension to fully kick in and also (my impression) to have
less noisy results.
Ater 1015 games on my QUAD at 60"+0.05
Mod vs Orig 173 - 150 - 692 ELO +8
Handle also the SMP case. This has been quite tricky, not
trivial to enforce the node limit in SMP case becuase
with "helpful master" concept we can have recursive split
points and we cannot lock them all at once so there is the
risk of counting the same nodes more than once.
Anyhow this patch should be race free and counted nodes are
correct.
No functional change.
As long as isPvMove (renamed to pvMove) is set after
legality check, we can postpone legality even in PV case.
Patch aligns the PV case with the common non-pv one.
No functional change.
Currently we exit the loop when
abs(bestValue) >= VALUE_KNOWN_WIN
but there is no logical reason for this. It seems more
natural to re-search again with full open window.
This has practically no impact in most cases, we have a
'no functional change' running 'bench' command.
Before the search we setup the starting position doing all the
moves (sent by GUI) from start position to the position just
before to start searching.
To do this we use a set of StateInfo records used by each
do_move() call. These records shall be kept valid during all
the search because repetition draw detection uses them to back
track all the earlier positions keys. The problem is that, while
searching, the GUI could send another 'position' command, this
calls set_position() that clears the states! Of course a crash
follows shortly.
Before searching all the relevant parameters are copied in
start_searching() just for this reason: to fully detach data
accessed during the search from the UCI protocol handling.
So the natural solution would be to copy also the setup states.
Unfortunatly this approach does not work because StateInfo
contains a pointer to the previous record, so naively copying and
then freeing the original memory leads to a crash.
That's why we use two std::auto_ptr (one belonging to UCI and another
to Search) to safely transfer ownership of the StateInfo records to
the search, after we have setup the root position.
As a nice side-effect all the possible memory leaks are magically
sorted out for us by std::auto_ptr semantic.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
To mimics C++11 std::mutex and std::condition_variable,
also rename locks and condition variables to be more
uniform across the classes.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Check we are the last slave of the split point
before to wake up the master. This should avoid
spurious wakes up.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
We can detect the split point master also from within idle_loop,
so we can call the function without parameters and remove an
overloaded member hack in Thread class.
Note that we don't need to take a lock around curSplitPoint
when entering idle_loop() because if we are the master then
curSplitPoint cannot change under our feet (because is_searching
is set and so we cannot be reallocated), if we are a slave
we enter idle_loop() only upon Thread creation and in that case
is always splitPointsCnt == 0. This is true even in the very rare
case that curSplitPoint != NULL, if we have been already allocated
even before entering idle_loop().
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Templetize MovePicker::next_move() member function instead. It
is easier and we also avoid the forwarding of MovePicker() c'tor
arguments in the common case.
Suggested by Rein Halbersma.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
And group there all the formatting functions but
uci_pv() that requires access to search.cpp variables.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Use the helpers to format the PV info but without
writing to output stream (file or cout). Message
formatting and sending are two logically different
task.
Incidentaly reintroduce the pretty_pv() name,
from Glaurung memories :-)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Simplifies the code and seems more natural.
We have a very small fucntional change becuase now
at PV nodes castles are extended one ply anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems more accurate: lsb is clear while 'first
bit' depends from where you look at the bitboard.
And fix compile in case of 64 bits platforms that
do not use BSFQ intrinsics.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Although a (little) functional change, we have no ELO change
but formula it is now more clear.
After 13019 games at 30"+0.05
Mod vs Orig 2075 - 2088 - 8856 ELO 0 (+- 3.4)
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After extensive testing (I was off line this week and let
the test go on) it seems this change is useless:
After 33968 games on a QUAD (4 threads) at 15"+0.05
Mod vs Orig 5425 - 5550 - 22993 ELO -1 (+-2.1)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems ADL lookup is broken with the STLPort library. Peter says:
The compiler is gcc 4.4.3, but I don't know how many patches they
have applied to it. I think gcc has had support for Koenig lookup
a long time. I think the problem is the type of the vector iterator.
For example, line 272 in search.cpp:
if (bookMove && count(RootMoves.begin(), RootMoves.end(), bookMove))
gives the error:
jni/stockfish/search.cpp:272: error: 'count' was not declared in this scope
Here RootMoves is:
std::vector<RootMove> RootMoves;
If std::vector<T>::iterator is implemented as T*, then Koenig lookup
would fail because RootMove* is not in namespace std.
I compile with the stlport implementation of STL, which in its vector
class has:
typedef value_type* iterator;
I'm not sure if this is allowed by the C++ standard. I did not find
anything that says the iterator type must belong to namespace std.
The consensus in this thread
http://compgroups.net/comp.lang.c++.moderated/argument-dependent-lookup/433395
is that the stlport iterator type is allowed.
Report and patch by Peter Osterlund.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Hex representation doesn't add any value in those cases.
Preserve hex representation where more self-documenting
for instance for binary masks values.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It seems to increase SMP performances. To note that
this patch goes in the opposite direction of "Active
reparenting" where we try to reparent an idle slave
as soon as possible. Instead here we prefer to keep
it idle instead of splitting on a shallow / near the
leaves node.
After 11550 games on a QUAD (4 threads) at 15"+0.05
Mod vs Orig 1972 - 1752 - 7826 ELO +6 (+-3.6)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
A PvNode that givesCheck has been already granted
an extension of ONE_PLY in previous condition.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
After 6K games at 60" + 0.1 on QUAD with 4 threads
this implementation fails to show a measurable increase,
result is well within error bar.
Perhaps with 8 or more threads resut is better but we
don't have the hardware to test. So retire for now and
in case re-add in the future if it proves good on big
machines.
The only good news is that we don't have a regression and
implementation is stable and bug-free, so could be reused
somewhere in the future.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
The check for detecting when a split point has all the
slaves still running is done with:
slavesMask == allSlavesMask
When a thread reparents, slavesMask is increased, then, if
the same thread finishes, because there are no more moves,
slavesMask returns to original value and the above condition
returns to be true. So that the just finished thread immediately
reparents again with the same split point, then starts and
then immediately exits in a tight loop that ends only when a
second slave finishes, so that slavesMask decrements and the
condition becomes false. This gives a spurious and anomaly
high number of faked reparents.
With this patch, that rewrites the logic to avoid this pitfall,
the reparenting success rate drops to a more realistical 5-10%
for 4 threads case.
As a side effect note that now there is no more the limit of
maxThreadsPerSplitPoint when reparenting.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Check for a cutoff occurred also high in
the tree and not only at current split
point.
This avoids some more wasted reparenting.
No functional chnage.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
It is more correct given what the function does. In
particular single_bit() returns true also in case of
empty bitboards.
Of course also the usual renaming while there :-)
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Instead of reparenting to oldest split point, try to reparent
to latest. The nice thing here is that we can use the YBWC
helpful master condition to allow the reparenting of a split
point master as long as is reparented to one of its slaves.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
